General Gaming News and Discussion

spronk

spronk

FPS noob
24,897
31,380
a huge chunk of that money is going into fortnite/GAAS and gacha mobile games, thats my point. mobile gacha games like genshin impact and stuff alone made over $5b last year, previously all that money was spent on AAA games. Fortnite alone made $6 billion in 2025 - Nintendos entire global revenue in 2025 was $8 billion. Roblux made $5 billion.

yeah for sure nintendo is huge and doing extremely well, as you say a big chunk of people buying single player games are 20-50s not kids. But an entire generation of kids now has been trained to play GAAS and f2p games and watch games on streams instead of playing them, I think that makes the future very bleak for single player narrative focused expensive budget games as older people age out and there are fewer kids to replace them.

hopefully it changes (tastes change wildly as you age) but I'm not sure how it'll go.
 
mkopec

mkopec

<Gold Donor>
28,648
45,319
And if the AAA games were not shit, like pretty much all of them have been in the last few years, they would be selling too. Maybe people just dont want to spend money on shit?
 
  • 4Like
Reactions: 3 users
Dr.Retarded

Dr.Retarded

<Silver Donator>
19,495
43,435
Daezuel said:
Click to expand...

250 years of Starfield!

Live Action Smile GIF by Xbox
 
  • 2Double Worf
  • 1Worf
Reactions: 2 users
Cybsled

Cybsled

Naxxramas 1.0 Raider
18,838
15,366
Which wasn't a bad idea at its core, the execution just sucked. It's just a really average feeling game. They spread themselves so thin that nothing really stands out.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user
Kharzette

Kharzette

Watcher of Overs
6,233
6,218
This is long and rambling and the english is a bit rough:



Talks about boiling open world games down into measurable metrics and the tower-map-reveal mechanic. Funny thing is I haven't played a single game that has that so I was a bit confused.

There's a bit of recent zelda glazing as well which casts doubt on the whole thing to me. I didn't play it but ugh that terrain looked very 2005.

So to summarize: Managers make everything worse, which is why indies and valve and small teams make good games.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user
TJT

TJT

Mr. Poopybutthole
<Gold Donor>
47,312
130,286
Urlithani said:
RUB IT IN WHY DONT YOU?!?

View attachment 634528
Click to expand...

I'll remain skeptical. Game design these days is just getting worse by these studios and I am not sure if this will be an exception. Skyrim was great in 2011 (god damn) but Skyrim was derivative compared to Oblivion and even moreso Morrowind.

I think it is very likely to expect the game being organized around a gimmick of some kind like Dragonshouts in Skyrim. The existence of this mechanic cheapens everything else. For example, you can't have a cool spell creation system if you have Dragonshouts, as then they wouldn't use them!
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users
TJT

TJT

Mr. Poopybutthole
<Gold Donor>
47,312
130,286
Kharzette said:
This is long and rambling and the english is a bit rough:



Talks about boiling open world games down into measurable metrics and the tower-map-reveal mechanic. Funny thing is I haven't played a single game that has that so I was a bit confused.

There's a bit of recent zelda glazing as well which casts doubt on the whole thing to me. I didn't play it but ugh that terrain looked very 2005.

So to summarize: Managers make everything worse, which is why indies and valve and small teams make good games.
Click to expand...

This is definitely a big rabbit hole on game design philosophy. But all AAA games have adopted it because they love "metrics." Most of this revolves around the following principle. If you spend $500k in dev time on your cool hidden dungeon, but only 1% of players ever touch it this was a wasted $500k. Therefore you need to do other things that make this hidden dungeon as obvious as possible. Making it no longer hidden and cool. Similarly, you want the player's time so you can't have a RPG that actually locks you into any path. Because that would hide content from the player. Therefore a player can be the Archmage of the Mage Guild, Gladiator of the Arena, Master of the Warrior's Guild, Thief Lord of the Thieve's guild all in the same playthrough.

How these fucking idiots embrace this while most players don't even finish the game is beyond me. If you develop a AAA $500 million dollar game and only 40% of players even get to the end and credits roll. How was 60% of the game not dead development time?

Naxxramas being transplanted into Wrath of the Lich King is of course the greatest example of this philosophy in gaming history.
 
  • 4Like
Reactions: 3 users
Caeden

Caeden

Golden Baronet of the Realm
8,515
14,184
I was one of the fucktards that supported Naxx in Wrath for that reasoning. It’s not necessarily bad reasoning. But like you said, most people barely finish a game they play and it can have dumb effects on design. I’ve walked away from very few games in my life without finishing. Maybe it’s autism.

I wonder how much of this is people realizing also that we have so much distraction that not many replay the same games over and over. Hell, outside Elden Ring and BotW, the last time I replayed a game myself was OoT on N64 and pretty much every snes game I could afford. I replayed and replayed the fuck out Out of This World. It was short and the controls were jank but it was just an awesome experience.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user
TJT

TJT

Mr. Poopybutthole
<Gold Donor>
47,312
130,286
Caeden said:
I was one of the fucktards that supported Naxx in Wrath for that reasoning.
Click to expand...
The long term effects of that were catastrophic. Maybe game metrics weren't as advanced then but they had to know how many people actually raided to begin with. I'd bet both my balls the majority of players in Vanilla and BC never raided anything. They probably didn't even do Heroics in BC.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.