General Gaming News and Discussion

Seananigans

Honorary Shit-PhD
<Gold Donor>
15,355
39,936
Depends on if its an innie (like a dogs) or more like a human one where it hangs out.

It does bug me when dragons have 6 limbs, though. All megafauna on Earth has 4 limbs. Two legs, two wings, or two legs, two arms. Those are your options!

Dragons have 2/2/2. If it only has two back legs and two wings, it’s a wyvern. I’ve seen those called drakes too, but I’ve also seen two arms two legs called drakes.
 
  • 5Like
Reactions: 4 users

Sylas

<Gold Donor>
5,261
7,387
Dragons have 2/2/2. If it only has two back legs and two wings, it’s a wyvern. I’ve seen those called drakes too, but I’ve also seen two arms two legs called drakes.
Correct. Drakes 4 legs no wings. Wyverns 2 legs 2 wings. Dragons 4 legs 2 wings. Then you got eastern varieties which you can have 4 legs no wings but still fly ie cloud dragons or 2 wings no legs.

Folklore > Tolkien > dungeons and dragons. That's it. Just because fatman grrm wants to make a mythical fire breathing animal "realistic" doesn't mean hes right fucking up the nomenclature
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users

INTHEMIDSTOFLIONS

Trakanon Raider
1,268
1,866
Correct. Drakes 4 legs no wings. Wyverns 2 legs 2 wings. Dragons 4 legs 2 wings. Then you got eastern varieties which you can have 4 legs no wings but still fly ie cloud dragons or 2 wings no legs.

Folklore > Tolkien > dungeons and dragons. That's it. Just because fatman grrm wants to make a mythical fire breathing animal "realistic" doesn't mean hes right fucking up the nomenclature
I’ve never watched more than the first episode of GRRM. I didn’t finish his first book, once it got to Cersei killing puppies on page 100 I noped out.

but I know From Software also has 4 leg / no wings are considered dragons or wyrms.

all in all, each individual universe is going to be different. Tolkein considered orcs and goblins to be the same monster, but D&D or Warcraft consider them two separate monster species, etc. it doesn’t really matter as long as it’s consistent within each individual world.
 
  • 3Like
Reactions: 2 users

INTHEMIDSTOFLIONS

Trakanon Raider
1,268
1,866
I watched a video on sword and sorcery films last week and ILM basically created the basis for all dragon effects used today when they made the Dragon in Dragonslayer.
I’ve never heard of “sword and sorcery,” before but after watching a few videos on it and doing some research (comparing it to high fantasy, and to dark fantasy) I realized something.

previously, I thought I didn’t like fantasy. I do like dark souls (dark fantasy). But I just realized that I actually prefer sword & sorcery.

I’m adding to my reading list Conan to dip my toes into sword & sorcery literature.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users

Hateyou

Not Great, Not Terrible
<Bronze Donator>
18,527
50,107
I’ve never heard of “sword and sorcery,” before but after watching a few videos on it and doing some research (comparing it to high fantasy, and to dark fantasy) I realized something.

previously, I thought I didn’t like fantasy. I do like dark souls (dark fantasy). But I just realized that I actually prefer sword & sorcery.

I’m adding to my reading list Conan to dip my toes into sword & sorcery literature.
Read the first law series by Joe Abercrombie. It’s nice and dark, lots of grey characters, very gritty. If you do audiobooks instead of reading, it’s top tier.
 
  • 2Like
  • 2Solidarity
Reactions: 3 users

Chanur

Shit Posting Professional
<Gold Donor>
34,616
63,131
I’ve never heard of “sword and sorcery,” before but after watching a few videos on it and doing some research (comparing it to high fantasy, and to dark fantasy) I realized something.

previously, I thought I didn’t like fantasy. I do like dark souls (dark fantasy). But I just realized that I actually prefer sword & sorcery.

I’m adding to my reading list Conan to dip my toes into sword & sorcery literature.
Sword and Sorcery is far more realistic (in as far as human motivation aka greed) and gritty. D&D started as a sword and sorcery game which if you have read any of the basic or first edition stuff you will notice it is vastly different than the D&D of today. S&S is generally much more enjoyable than most fantasy in my opinion.

Conan was sword and sorcery as well originally.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users

Dr.Retarded

<Silver Donator>
18,416
40,895
Read the first law series by Joe Abercrombie. It’s nice and dark, lots of grey characters, very gritty. If you do audiobooks instead of reading, it’s top tier.
da baby GIF
 
  • 4Like
Reactions: 3 users

Tmac

Adventurer
<Aristocrat╭ರ_•́>
10,712
19,000
D&D today is not only gay, but also retarded.

Same w/ modern WarCraft or 40K.

You just homogenized three completely different things. Why do you have to make every thread on this site dumber?

Wizards of the Coast is gay, DND is not. Blizzard is gay, WarCraft is not.

It's like you don't know how anything works.
 
  • 2Faggotry
  • 1Worf
Reactions: 2 users

Kajiimagi

<Aristocrat╭ರ_•́>
4,339
8,143
I’ve never watched more than the first episode of GRRM. I didn’t finish his first book, once it got to Cersei killing puppies on page 100 I noped out.

but I know From Software also has 4 leg / no wings are considered dragons or wyrms.

all in all, each individual universe is going to be different. Tolkein considered orcs and goblins to be the same monster, but D&D or Warcraft consider them two separate monster species, etc. it doesn’t really matter as long as it’s consistent within each individual world.
Song of Fire and Ice (GRMM) is something you are frankly better off not getting into. The show was amazing ....until it ran out of book to scrape. Fatman isn't going to live long enough to finish , and he has enough $$$ not to care. He only released 1 book during the whole 8 season run and it featured a chapter of the dwarf ......staring at turtles.


Also, as long as they look cool I don't give a hot damn how many legs/wings a dragon has.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users