Recent content by Schatze_foh

Bumping this post to ensure future employers get an eyeful when doing a google check. I haven"t read the whole thread, but their full names are posted in this thread, ya?

OK, you posted tits, but link is broken for me.

To the google "can reading glasses damage my vision"; Not really, but doing any close work forces crystalline lens accommodation, the zonules tighten to flatten the lense to decrease the refractive power. However, this increases intraocular pressure (since the cilliary muscles are anchored to...

Was on a link to a chick who would get nude; she"d literally get banned within 30 seconds of showing everything. Was another forum"s yahoo live thread. The mods work fast there.

Rugby you don"t wear a cup. Better to be curled up in the fetal position vomiting than have your junk ripped off. If you wear a cup, you know you"re playing a sport for pussies. Or I guess one involving sharp blades (hockey). Self-reported sizes are always wrong. Comparing self-report versus...

I think the difficulty was that I was trying to argue with a bunch of people simultaneously. Each person would then assume that all of my post was directed at them or a specific poster, where only a single paragraph may have been addressed at one specific thing. So I started listing who I was...

Maxxius: No, that"s the thing, I"m not arguing a specific point. I"ve said this many times, if you"re going to criticise something, when that something has many very glaring flaws,why make up shit instead of going for the obvious? The problem is after saying something like that, people...

No, actually, it didn"t, that"s you interpolating a whole bunch of shit into brad"s statements so that you can draw the conclusions you"ve already decided upon ahead of time. You"re basically stating that brad said, "VG was unsuccessful." which would suit your motives fine, but is given the lie...

Draegen: People do care, as they were the ones making the argument for failure based on sub claims. Look, you"re doing it in the second damned paragraph of your post! Moreover, they"re basing their argument on Brad"s claims of success (or, hilariously, Utnayan"s claims meshed with Brad"s...

Rayne: Projected sales would be "We expect this number of boxes to be sold, y number of subscriptions by z date." The question based on this is what time frames are we talking about, as the number of subscriptions would be expressed as T(tau) (e.g. a given number of subscriptions active at...

No Rayne. I"m saying you"ve redefined failure from being economically viable (which brad states as 150 000 - 200 000, which is the objective way of looking at failure when speaking of a corporation), to his "wish" number (500 000). You claim because you do not think he will reach his wish...

Hey dickhead, no he doesn"t, read his fucking post. Mid 150k means middle of the number series ranging from 150 000 to a 159 999 whereas under 150k means a number series ranging from 0 - 149 999. And no, I certainly don"t know who the fuck that dude is! None at all! God damned idiots. And...

Under 150k subs did not come from Brad seeing as there is a quote on this same damned page that gives a very different number. The only person saying under 150k was utnayan who claimed that the real subscriber base was 50k and 100k individuals charged even after canceling. But yes continue to...

No shit, then you drew all sorts of conclusions that do not stem from the predicate to show VG is a failure! In fact, you drew all sorts of conclusions that are contradictory to the premise! Wow! Spin baby spin! edit: under 150k subs? Where did that number come from? Oh shit Utnayan! How...

yeah, quote people (in this case, brad) out of context and attribute meaning to their words that were never there! Misconstrue stuff to fit your agenda! Yes! Yes! That"s it! That"s right, oh yeah baby, yeah. Even that tiny bit you quoted of Brad"s in an attempt to argue your point disproves...