The Astronomy Thread

  • Guest, it's time once again for the hotly contested and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and fill out your bracket!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Once again, only you can decide!

khorum

Murder Apologist
24,338
81,363
The really heavy fuel is really just to get into orbit. Once in orbit, you can get to mars and back with TIE-fighter engines powered by an RTG if you're not in some big hurry.

Actually, some guys at MIT managed to get ion drives working on an airplane---potentially leading the way to drones that never need to land:


I wonder if that's been modded into kerbal yet.
 
Last edited:
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users

iannis

Musty Nester
31,351
17,656
So they managed to do another one of those crazy thruster landings?

Impressed. Two in a row is spectacular.
 
  • 2Like
  • 1WTF
Reactions: 2 users

Gavinmad

Mr. Poopybutthole
42,272
50,242
The really heavy fuel is really just to get into orbit. Once in orbit, you can get to mars and back with TIE-fighter engines powered by an RTG if you're not in some big hurry.

Actually, some guys at MIT managed to get ion drives working on an airplane---potentially leading the way to drones that never need to land:


I wonder if that's been modded into kerbal yet.

Astr0 specifically said land on Mars and return, not just orbit. We're talking about an extra 8000m/s of delta V to land and get back into orbit as well as enough thrust from the engine to handle the job.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Gavinmad

Mr. Poopybutthole
42,272
50,242
if you took your fucking head out of your ass for five minutes you would understand

You're the only one with your head up your ass you goalpost shifting faggot.

i'll start getting excited when we land a ship on mars and then it launches itself back out to come home. thats when it starts.

not necessarily, i mean if its a self contained ship with enough fuel for a round trip to mars, then yeah, not gonna happen for a while. but sending fuel ahead for one of our ships to dock with and refuel for the return mission is something we could do within ten years.

i dunno about no bombs. everything we send into space is full of fuel when it starts off. sending fuel cells into space to orbit around Mars shouldnt be too difficult if we can do the same with satellites already. all it would take is have one of our ships rendezvous with the fuel satellite and then start up an automatic refuelling program. it wouldnt take as much fuel to leave mars than it would to leave earth. lower grav and such. we have the tech right now to send a drone to Mars and have it come back if planned right over the next several years.

i think gavin is thinking we are talking about some large space craft here, when all i'm talking about is something not bigger than a large model rocket that kids make in school. i just need a proof of concept. get some tiny little ship over there and bring it back. do that and then we can start thinking about making things bigger and more efficient.

Start out talking about landing a ship on mars and bring it back home and end up switching to oh i just mean a model rocket, and then post a video of a model rocket barely breaking atmosphere here on Earth as opposed to a different planet 100 million miles away.

Fucking twit.
 
  • 1Salty
Reactions: 1 user

Oldbased

> Than U
27,548
64,643
It doesn't take near the fuel to leave Mars as it does Earth. The question is why do it without people. We have plenty of rust here on Earth.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

pharmakos

soʞɐɯɹɐɥd
<Bronze Donator>
16,306
-2,239
Astr0 specifically said land on Mars and return, not just orbit. We're talking about an extra 8000m/s of delta V to land and get back into orbit as well as enough thrust from the engine to handle the job.

That's for Earth. Mars is significantly smaller and has thinner atmosphere, takes way less thrust to launch from Mars.
 

Gavinmad

Mr. Poopybutthole
42,272
50,242
That's for Earth. Mars is significantly smaller and has thinner atmosphere, takes way less thrust to launch from Mars.

Jesus Christ. It's almost like I said land AND return to orbit, which is why I doubled the delta V from 4k to 8k.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users

Chukzombi

Millie's Staff Member
71,528
212,734
You're the only one with your head up your ass you goalpost shifting faggot.









Start out talking about landing a ship on mars and bring it back home and end up switching to oh i just mean a model rocket, and then post a video of a model rocket barely breaking atmosphere here on Earth as opposed to a different planet 100 million miles away.

Fucking twit.
ive been saying the whole time the size didnt matter you fucktard. all it needed to do was get there and back. proof of concept.
 

Oldbased

> Than U
27,548
64,643
Elon will do it before USSF/USAF/NASA. His initial BFR's first missions was ferrying fuel and supplies to space. Since just 1 falcon 9 booster stage is very capable of leaving mars and having enough fuel to burn for Earth due to Mars low gravity, it would be fairly easy to get a shelled booster to Mars intact and even if need be LAND. The first hurdle is having someplace to even land. Makes it all dull when you think about it. Like Boring dull, or rather Boring machine automation.
 

Mudcrush Durtfeet

Hungry Ogre
2,428
-758
Pretty sure the main point of the BFR _is_ to go to mars and come back (refueling on Mars).

If someone built a nuclear thermal rocket it could be done. Politically not feasible for the U.S.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

iannis

Musty Nester
31,351
17,656
I wonder if the math gets better if you make smaller craft.

Fail rate is ok. Spend 500k each, send a bunch. If only 15% of them come back you've still retrieved samples at a lower risk than one multi billion mission.

Your probably have to launch nuclear reactors though. No bueno i guess.

And the math might suck to begin with.
 

pharmakos

soʞɐɯɹɐɥd
<Bronze Donator>
16,306
-2,239
Do you understand that when a delta-V map says it takes 9400 m/s of delta-V to go from Earth's surface to LEO, that figure remains constant regardless of what you're trying to get from the surface into LEO?

Yeah I do now, I admit I'm a bit over my head in this conversation, but I also have read enough popsci written by people that do know that they're talking about to know that people a lot smarter thank chuk also think his idea is possible in current year. You're talking about it as if it's infeasible.