I'm not handwaving anything. If anything, those links further support what I said about the goal of these feminists being to support the victims victims of sexual assault as a counter to what they see as a punishing environment for those willing to come forward. There's no vitriol for Ghomeshi...
Let me spell it out for you: Feminists offering emotional support to victims of sexual assault are not demonstrating the mindset that led to lynchings.
It is all separate from my point, but it's a valid point of view nonetheless. I totally get why this is a hot-button issue on all sides. I just strognly disagree with the tactic of pushing a polarizing "us vs them" narrative.
None of those Tweets are about Gomeshi (or even written by Feminist...
I wish you hadn't made me check that, but here goes:
The message of that Tweet isn't "put accused rapists in jail on the word of the supposed victim alone". They're not trying to get rid of due process. This is not the same mind set that led to lynchings because it's not about villaining...
No, but he did also tell him you could make napalm by mixing equal parts gasoline and frozen orange juice.
And Etwynn, I'm not saying blood on the toilet seat isn't gross, but if you piss on the floor,wipe that shit up.Jesus Christ.
See, this is exactly the type of bullshit I'm talking about. I make a perfectly reasonable post that acknowledges the difficulty of this issue, and I somehow get accused of being responsible for people getting raped and murdered. I'm not the bad guy here, asshole, and you sure as fuck aren't...
Yes, that comment was one of a string of posts I made sarcastically drawing attention to the "apologist" narrative, and it doesn't contain any agreement or disagreement with the chief's words.
As for the "specific and predictable circumstances", yeah, you're probably right. When a subject is...
No.
I haven't been "asking questions" about immigrant violence, let alone selectively. My one and only statement about that topic was that it's bullshit to call someone an apologist because they dared to consider the socioeconomic reasons behind violent acts, and that was in response to a...
The best part is the last paragraph:
...Like you're supposed to hunt down unsupervised children in the supermarket and collapse shelves of cereal onto them (after gaining their trust). To teach them a lesson, or something. I mean, I guess it's supposed to be tongue-in-cheek, but I'm actually not...
Is she Quaid's "hero"?
Oh, typical Quaid, always ready to defend whatever stance I take in a discussion. Or, stay with me here, maybe our reaction has fuck all to do with SJWism andyourreaction haseverythingto do with anti-SJWism?
GENDER NEWTRAL FAGOTRY! MUH WAR HEROES! DON'T TUCH MUH...
That's the whole point, Beese, you don't have to!
When I sing:
"With glowing hearts we see thee rise,
Moon landings we don't fake"
You can sing whatever you want!
When I sing:
"Black families, we're living with,
We stand on guard for thee."
You just sing what feels right for you...
Exactly. Some people just lookin' to be offended I guess. Triggered by words like "gender neutral" or what have you.
Besides, when I sing the national anthem every morning, nobody can force me to use certain words. I sing it how it's writtenin my heart.
I'm fine with that.
It's not even like they're changing the spirit of the song:
You're becoming quite the worry-wort, Bisi. Have you startedthe change?
Jesus Christ, guys. Any particular reason we're bringing up these past events? Hodj has been on his best behavior for months, why the fuck are you pushing him off the wagon again?
Ummm... Is this not the page where we can ask questions abut the election process?
At least, does the nominated party even have to acknowledge and accept their nomination before they are considered in the running? This needs to be cleared up!