Oh, but that's the joke. All the crazy shit he said about Batman isn't wrong. He's trying to portray the absurdity of the current situation like it's both obvious and reasonable. Now we are talking about how terrible the different Supes have been written.
It's why if you are a long term comic...
He knows better on all fronts. He's just trolling to troll because a bunch of people started talking about Batman and Superman and he knows how fucking absurd all that shit actually is. He's intentionally saying wrong things to prolong the argument.
But I'm bored so here we are.
You are arguing about shit no one was arguing about while also saying wrong shit at the same time. You don't know one crisis from another and you don't know the difference between one guy with a "S" on his chest and another. You keep on about how Superman punched reality at the end of Final...
Pre-Crisis and Post-Crisis refers to Crisis on Infinite Earths and not Infinite Crisis or Final Crisis.
Go back to blogging about how Cyclops was right you filthy casual.
Superboy Prime is not Superman. When you said that at the end of Final Crisis that Superman punched the universe you were twice wrong. Superboy Prime punches the universe during Infinite Crisis. No one likes Superboy Prime.
You filthy casual.
No one likes Superboy Prime and don't you pretend anyone does. He's a fanboy strawman that bitches about how everything used to be so much better before.
The Joker doesn't even make any sense anymore. He's become the avatar of murder. He is literally murder made flesh. Grant Morrison got the ball rolling and now it's just absurd.
Penny in that story is just a junkie. She's got all the junkie mannerisms and is telling all the junkie lies with all the junkie self deceptions and a husband that's enabling her junkie lifestyle. I bet if you monitored her brain during a feed session and the brain of a crack addict smoking...
There's really not much value for those older games. When I was cleaning out piles of games I just threw it on eBay divided by game in the hopes some other nerds somewhere were still playing that shit.
There are always nerds still playing that shit.
That's not an articlefromMs. Magazine you idiot. That's a scholarly research paper from Mary P. Koss, the lady who did the study where "1 in 4 women are raped" came from. You are aware that there are rape laws on the books to this day that require the victim to have been penetrated, right...
Here is a quote from the 2007 paper by Koss (the Ms Magazine 1 in 4 women have been raped study person) Revising the SES: A Collaborative Process to Improve Assessment of Sexual Aggression and Victimization
No, it's a gender issue.
The best part about actual cases is they cite things.
Right, so being drunk isn't enough even if your sexual inhibitions are lowered and even if you are mentally impaired provided you are able to exercise reasonable judgement as to whether or not you want to ride dick.
You can tell already he's going to cling to the phrase "capable of making rational decisions."
Video related -
edit - holy fuck he used it again in the time it took me to find this sketch
That would have been Tanoomba's position yesterday and since the thread started, yes. Mist's position would be that you would deserve whatever charges she felt like filing in the morning.
Tanoomba, you've been arguing for weeks that intoxication automatically negates consent (and it doesn't) because something something contracts. You don't get to now act like you've always been arguing about degrees of intoxication. This is literally the first hour of the first day of you taking...
It's disgusting that you would try and move the discussion to a bunch of men sitting around rating intoxicated women on a would fuck/would not fuck scale.
I'm not liking this remake of Just One of the Guys. Doing the whole thing in message board format rather than a motion picture isn't an improvement and at least that stinker ended with getting to see the main character's rack.
And she learned a lesson. I don't remember what that is at the...
Hey Cad, if I try and weasel out of a contract claiming that I was intoxicated at the time how sympathetic am I to find the judge to be? What's that Cad, you've explained this before? And the answer is "not very sympathetic at all?" You are saying that just being intoxicated isn't enough to void...
I'm not afraid of the question. I've seen enough sexy transgendered people that, provided their penis was smaller than mine, I might be willing to give it a go with. Fat cocks not welcome.
It's dishonest to put a heterosexual encounter where the woman does not remember what happened on one...