Search results

You call it a "man path". There is no brainwashing here. I want to continue living as well, or better than I do now for the rest of my life. I want to own boats, take fun, exotic vacations, own nice cars and live in a nice house. I want to be able to keep my membership at my private country...

Going very well. I'll let you bros know once the honeymoon phase is over and it all crashes and burns.

You strike me as a very angry man.

You're projecting. I never said that, never implied it either. You're just used to arguing with people who are speaking in nothing but absolutes in this thread. I was speaking about statistical analyses. It should be fairly evident, based on that statement alone, which I made earlier in the...

Did you not read the article I linked?

I articulated myself just fine. You are just in attack mode because of the three stooges here.

Well the one thing you guys seem to be latching onto is that income is the sole and only driver for all women or that all women will only ever end up with a man who is more successful than them and that these desires never change over time or in certain populations. That's not what I'm saying at...

This is also why I love Tuna steaks

I don't have an agenda. I'm not making any claims based on the research. I don't know exactly what it means. I just know that women judge a man based on whether or not he is more affluent than she is.

No it isn't. You'll never hear me say "women are money grubbing whores" and the argument isn't even remotely similar. Saying women gravitate to men who are more affluent than they are themselves is not even close to saying "All women want only your money and are whores also". And it doesn't...

There is a huge difference in that. Men may want someone who just has a decent job and "some" ambition. Women want a man who makes a lot more money than they themself make. Men and women gauge potential partners vastly differently in that regard.

No. That's actually not what they are saying and there is very ample evidence out there to support what they are saying. Which is that women prefer men who are more successful than they themselves are and can take on the role of "provider". Even if the woman is successful herself.

You realize that "Most women who cheat never get found out" is at odds with your message right? Hypergamy isn't about cheating. It's about trading up. If you're trading up you're not leaving your current partner until you've secured a new one. That would imply eventually the truth always comes out.

No, he is saying women will always seek to upgrade over their current man, while they are still in the relationship *IF* a better man shows interest.

The first rule of Redpill is that there are no rules.

Well maybe not in the Marvel Universe. But in real life the Bronx Zoo is a pretty cool place.

It's even worse if she is actually intelligent and engaging. Because then she's just lazy and/or wasted talent. Ambition is a must for me.

They say "eh" instead of "what" or "duh". That's the mighty power of Canada.

Well he said they cut it off at 100k+ because it didn't make any difference (which is why it just says 100k+) The only problem with that statistic is that it includes all women, so it doesn't really answer my question. Not the subset I was specifically referring to (Professional women...

Something else I've always wondered. Is there a "no-fly" zone in regards to a listed income. For instance if my income was say... $80k/yr would it be OK to list it because it's decent and shows I have at least some ability to be an adult and provider but if my income is $170k/yr and I list it am...

What's better evidence? Anecdotal or statistical analysis of a huge population?

No I really don't. I will never be part of a relationship where it is expected of me to be the sole provider. Ever. I went down that road twice in the past and both times money and ambition were the biggest catalysts to me breaking things off. That is a road I won't travel again.

I did a little experiment once. I never had all that hard a time getting dates on these sites but I found that professional women's response rates to my messages were way lower than non-professional. This is when I did not have my income listed. So then I listed my income to see if it would make...

Then I'd fuck her. But I still wouldn't date her.

I agree, but there's a bit of a double standard there. I can't tell you how often I get lambasted (even in this thread) because I don't want to date a broke woman.

No you keep the pillow, you just rotate the covers until they are used up.

I can't get any of the video streams of day 1 to work on my Kindle Fire. All other youtube videos load fine. WTF is going on here?!?

I would suggest a Red Pill(ow)

It hasn't gotten off tangent at all. This is a thread about dating sites, AKA getting laid with little to no effort. Sounds like she wouldn't take much effort to bed. DO IT.

Have her drive to you!

What does that have to do with what we're talking about here?

She wants you back. You should let her suck you off.

No you don't. You love porn. And you love acting like all the women who aren't interested in your disgusting fat ass isn't because you're a disgusting fat ass, but because you weren't treating them like the sluts they are.

I have a bridge for sale.

That's the best wake up call there is. I wonder if hotels in Vegas offer wake up calls like that.

You guys know what rhetoric is right? I've said it before but Dumar is the ultimate rhetoric troll. He speaks only in rhetoric and does it really poorly. At least, I hope he's a troll. Otherwise he might actually be autistic like everyone else here is claiming. Rhetoric: language designed...

All the places around here have an overstock of it as well. It's lining the shelves.

You're right... you are boring. Have her write your profile for sure.

What the fuck is this loose skin debate? How does that even fucking happen? I went from 280 to 172 and I have no loose skin at all.

Yes Hoss, it would have fooled all of us. You are the chosen one. Now... which pill will you choose?