1917 (2019)

Almost as if it's a prequel to Dunkirk.

So this movie is going to be a real time one continuous shot, done by Roger Dekins...hollllllllllllllllly shit

I after the children of men thing- I always wanted to do an entire movie one shot... but well- I am no screamfeeder so... lol

If this is truely one shot....wowowo

Juvarisx said:

So this movie is going to be a real time one continuous shot, done by Roger Dekins...hollllllllllllllllly shit

Click to expand...

Well, we know what's winning every technical award this year.

Intrinsic said:

That video shows and mentions there being multiple “scenes” being shot, so not sure how they are going about whole movie thing.

Click to expand...

I believe only one feature length movie has been shot as a true one-shot.

I would assume this would be done like Birdman, where the end product that we watch is "one-shot" but it is a bunch of super long shots stitched at strategic points. Still ends up super cool since you don't have a ton of "shot-reverse shot" and quick cuts and other editing nonsense to stitch together multiple takes. Either the take is perfect, or its in the trash.

Zapatta said:

Errrf, WW1 movies are tough to stomach, if they are going to be accurate the fighting was so much more gruesome and demoralizing than WW2 combat. Blood is blood and dead is dead, but shit was more cruel and inhumane that anything before or since.

Click to expand...

The first adaptation of All Quiet on the Western Front from 1930 has an extended battle that was so fucking long, loud and violent that I taken aback by it.

I guess back then they didn't even know to tone it down a bit for audiences.

Insert this directly into my face

Watch out for articles about how there's a lack of stronk women or lack of blacks in this movie.