1944

kroenen

Regimen Morum
5,513
29,414
0.00 star(s) Rating: 0.00/5 0 Votes
Title: 1944

Genre: Western, Drama

Creator: Taylor Sheridan

Overview: A prequel to Yellowstone featuring a new generation of the Dutton family ranchers in the 1940s.
 

Aldarion

Egg Nazi
10,359
28,811
in before the promiscuous blond daughter causes drama and the wise Injuns fix everything
 

Lanx

<Prior Amod>
68,689
159,214
lemme guess
theyre gonna start out w/ the dutton family struggling and by the end of the first episode the eldest son dies
 

Cybsled

Naxxramas 1.0 Raider
17,447
13,963
It's 1944 - someone either dies in the war or was discharged because of severe wounds.
 

BrutulTM

Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun.
<Silver Donator>
15,109
-1,028
Over/under for people being shot is 75.
 

Cad

scientia potentia est
<Bronze Donator>
26,913
56,190
Spencer shouldn't even be that old in 1944 and John Dutton Sr. should only be 20 or 21. Will be a very small jump from 1923. They might even need the same actor to play Spencer with some grey hair or something.
 

Downhammer

Vyemm Raider
1,635
4,236
It's going to have to have something new/different from other yellowstone shows. We already know Spencer lives until 1968ish from the epilogue. Yellowstone flashbacks show John II (the baby born in 1923) as an old man and didn't father John III (Costner) until the 50s. They could try and create life or death tension but we know who lives so any death drama will have to involve non-mainline Duttons. The mainline family tree is known now so there's no drama around which pregnancy produces the heir.

These shows are basically printing money right now though, so I'm sure it will do well. There's plenty of unknowns to create stories for as well; Jack and Elizabeth's child, Spencer's second son with some widow. There's also other Dutton headstones in present day that haven't been explained although there's no logical explanation for them yet (they could be older siblings to Costner, but why would a younger son be the "third"). They could also repeat a Jacob/Cara situation and just make up new Duttons who show up as needed to fill in generational gaps.
 
Last edited:

elidib

Vyemm Raider
2,514
4,815
Ok but the real question is which noble savage trope are they going with this time for the indian plotline, since they already used up girlboss indian.
 

spronk

FPS noob
23,852
29,108
1944 would be a good time period to use a jap girlboss, her parents are being sent to internment camps but she's a girlboss working at Los Alamos and secretly helps develop nuclear bombs while men steal all the credit

her name? Toyota Oppenheimer
 
  • 2Worf
Reactions: 1 users

Aldarion

Egg Nazi
10,359
28,811
Ok but the real question is which noble savage trope are they going with this time for the indian plotline, since they already used up girlboss indian.
What makes you think they can't re-use tropes?

They've been pretending Indians were peaceful and wise and white men were brutal savages in literally every single Indian story since Dances With Wolves. Why stop now?
 

Cad

scientia potentia est
<Bronze Donator>
26,913
56,190
It's going to have to have something new/different from other yellowstone shows. We already know Spencer lives until 1968ish from the epilogue. Yellowstone flashbacks show John II (the baby born in 1923) as an old man and didn't father John III (Costner) until the 50s. They could try and create life or death tension but we know who lives so any death drama will have to involve non-mainline Duttons. The mainline family tree is known now so there's no drama around which pregnancy produces the heir.

These shows are basically printing money right now though, so I'm sure it will do well. There's plenty of unknowns to create stories for as well; Jack and Elizabeth's child, Spencer's second son with some widow. There's also other Dutton headstones in present day that haven't been explained although there's no logical explanation for them yet (they could be older siblings to Costner, but why would a younger son be the "third"). They could also repeat a Jacob/Cara situation and just make up new Duttons who show up as needed to fill in generational gaps.
If it's 1944 then John Dutton Sr. could have gotten drafted, he'd be 20-21. New villain is making a play for the ranch, Spencer is too old to fight now and John Dutton Sr. has to get home with his newfound war experience to save the ranch...
 

Lanx

<Prior Amod>
68,689
159,214
1944 would be a good time period to use a jap girlboss, her parents are being sent to internment camps but she's a girlboss working at Los Alamos and secretly helps develop nuclear bombs while men steal all the credit

her name? Toyota Oppenheimer
the duttons were hiding japs in their floorboards!
 

Downhammer

Vyemm Raider
1,635
4,236
After rewatching the 1923 epilogue I'm fairly certain '44 will involve some conflict with the half brother from the widow. It's such an irrelevant thing for Elsa to mention that it has to serve as backstory for a new bastard half-Dutton. Add in Jack's child's claim as the eldest son of the eldest son and they've got a pretty easy 3 way fight for the ranch.

I hope they're not so lazy as to just recast the war vet son (Kayce, Spencer) vs the bastard (Jamie) vs the one running the ranch (Beth/Rip, John I/Jack) vs outsiders/Rainwaters but I'm sure that's the majority of what we'll get.
 
TV show information provided by The Movie Database