Alt-Right or Alt-Reich: The Rise of American Nationalism

Cybsled

Ahn'Qiraj Raider
8,148
3,825
10d 13h 30m
Majority Nationalism isn't new, but history usually shows how flawed it was. Go back over 100 years and people had as much disdain for Irish and Italians, but pretty sure things worked out OK.
 

Intrinsic

Person of Whiteness
<Donor All-Stars>
8,310
3,144
26d 11h 35m
There was a @Lithose post a while back talking about the ridiculousness of multiculturalism and how that isn't, hasn't, or shouldn't be the goal. There was a lot in the post I agreed with but can't seem to find it.

I'm sure he keeps copies of his essays meta tagged and searchable. Hopefully it is an easy repost.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chthonic-anemos

ZyyzYzzy

Shitpost Counsel
<Prior Amod>
18,278
25,936
56d 21h 42m
There was a @Lithose post a while back talking about the ridiculousness of multiculturalism and how that isn't, hasn't, or shouldn't be the goal. There was a lot in the post I agreed with but can't seem to find it.

I'm sure he keeps copies of his essays meta tagged and searchable. Hopefully it is an easy repost.
I remember that post. Completely agree with it to a degree. Multiculturalism fails and should not be considered unless there are common values/characteristics among the cultures to allow for complete integration. I.e. European immigrants (Italians, Irish, etc...) that all integrated into American society due to similar beliefs and values.
 

sadris

<Donors Crew>
14,196
53,917
48d 15h 5m
Majority Nationalism isn't new, but history usually shows how flawed it was. Go back over 100 years and people had as much disdain for Irish and Italians, but pretty sure things worked out OK.
What is the average IQ of Irish and Italians?

Or if you want a non-IQ approach, fascinating article about tribalism:

National Prosperity
 
  • Like
Reactions: chthonic-anemos

Intrinsic

Person of Whiteness
<Donor All-Stars>
8,310
3,144
26d 11h 35m
I remember that post. Completely agree with it to a degree. Multiculturalism fails and should not be considered unless there are common values/characteristics among the cultures to allow for complete integration. I.e. European immigrants (Italians, Irish, etc...) that all integrated into American society due to similar beliefs and values.
Yeah that was the one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chthonic-anemos

Lleauaric

Sparkletot Monger
<Donors Crew>
4,053
3,464
5h 59m
"My country is great". Nice. /high five

"My country is better than all others". Ehh a bit douchey, but whatever.

"My country is the master and others are the slaves". Ok. Problem.
 

ZyyzYzzy

Shitpost Counsel
<Prior Amod>
18,278
25,936
56d 21h 42m
"My country is great". Nice. /high five

"My country is better than all others". Ehh a bit douchey, but whatever.

"My country is the master and others are the slaves". Ok. Problem.
To your last point, isn't that where globalism leads? Fuck those poor countries, we are going to use essentially slave labor to make all the goods we like dirt cheap
 

MachRed

<Donors Crew>
104
295
3d 19h 13m
Why are Black pride, gay pride and Asian pride all viewed positively but white pride is viewed negatively? - Quora

This was pretty eye opening for me. Basically, because of the sheer fact most races have a lighter skin color compared to blacks(duh), whites enjoy privilege 365 days a year. 'White' is the default color, so pride is not needed/taboo. A comparison was made that heterosexuality is the default, so no need for hetero pride.

Blacks want equality (in population basically) and 'whites' that do not identify as white (Hispanics, Asians, Europeans?) still count towards the 'white' headcount, leading to an over representation of these 'minority' races.

It's retarded and the average white guy is perpetually fucked...
 

Palum

Less Valuable Than A Visitor
<Donors Crew>
18,464
22,562
0
Why are Black pride, gay pride and Asian pride all viewed positively but white pride is viewed negatively? - Quora

This was pretty eye opening for me. Basically, because of the sheer fact most races have a lighter skin color compared to blacks(duh), whites enjoy privilege 365 days a year. 'White' is the default color, so pride is not needed/taboo. A comparison was made that heterosexuality is the default, so no need for hetero pride.

Blacks want equality (in population basically) and 'whites' that do not identify as white (Hispanics, Asians, Europeans?) still count towards the 'white' headcount, leading to an over representation of these 'minority' races.

It's retarded and the average white guy is perpetually fucked...
So then since men are the minority?
 

fanaskin

Well known Agitator
33,268
64,366
54d 4h 46m
"M
"My country is the master and others are the slaves". Ok. Problem.
To your last point, isn't that where globalism leads? Fuck those poor countries, we are going to use essentially slave labor to make all the goods we like dirt cheap
Literally yes, Globalism is the new imperialism, lleauaric is thinking in an outmoded mindset
 

Eidal

<Donors Crew>
2,001
218
13h 23m
There was a @Lithose post a while back talking about the ridiculousness of multiculturalism and how that isn't, hasn't, or shouldn't be the goal. There was a lot in the post I agreed with but can't seem to find it.

I'm sure he keeps copies of his essays meta tagged and searchable. Hopefully it is an easy repost.
@Lithose I want to read this, too. If you can find it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chthonic-anemos

fanaskin

Well known Agitator
33,268
64,366
54d 4h 46m
I would say Globalism is more akin to economic imperialism, but on a corporate level rather governments.
This is what old imperialism was, Countries would charter companies and give them monopoly rights

hence "dutch east india company" anbd "British east India company" conquered india, not the english or dutch governments soldiers.

Colonization of many countries around the globe happened exactly the same way, through companies not government.



King leopolds company that enslaved the congo, same thing. Colonization of america it was initially started for some glass making company, same thing. Everywhere you go in history you'll find that companies lead the way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chthonic-anemos

Lleauaric

Sparkletot Monger
<Donors Crew>
4,053
3,464
5h 59m
Imperialism isn't the same as facism.

I'd say there are distinct differences between the East India Tea Company and Leibensraum.
 

fanaskin

Well known Agitator
33,268
64,366
54d 4h 46m
Imperialism isn't the same as facism.

I'd say there are distinct differences between the East India Tea Company and Leibensraum.
Funny cause Hitler modeled leabensraum on what america did. All of which was started by charter companies, all the colonies were charter companies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chthonic-anemos

Lleauaric

Sparkletot Monger
<Donors Crew>
4,053
3,464
5h 59m
So which is better? The one that puts its citizen's and nation's interests first or the interests of nebulous corporate entitites who are held by a few wealthy individuals?
It's funny how what's in the "citizens and nations best interests" always seem to end up being what's good for a few wealthy individuals or corporate entities.

I guess it all trickles down though
 
  • Like
Reactions: chthonic-anemos