Mary Poppins sequel announced. Fuck you Hollywood.

On a personal level this doesn't bother me at all, it's not like there isn't unused source material for this. Based on what I know of P.L. Travers's feelings on the original film though, I imagine her corpse is about to barrel roll itself into the center of the Earth.

Cannot stop imagining Anne Hathaway in a tight catwoman suit, not a good choice for Mary Poppins. Also, fuck Disney.

Children.....

The Simpsons already done it.

Excellent, will it be live action? We'll see how many people go see it on shrooms just for the weird trips that bitch is involved in.

either i am numb, or i really have no issue with a Poppins sequel. its gonna be a disney film and they hold their classics very, very dear. they may make a meh sequel, but i am sure it will not be a travesty of shit. their worst movie, john carter isnt even bad, it was just dumb and everyone on mars had a stupid name. i like anne hathaway so bring on her as Poppins.

btw
julie andrews was a hottie in her time and has been topless in at least one movie, so you can have a sexy Poppins.

Dude, I just watched Mary Poppins a month ago, and that chick was hot.

Poppins had the animation in it though. Van Dyke dancing with the penguins? Or am I thinking of Chitty-Chitty-Bang-Bang?

I haven't watched either one in ages. But yeah, Sound of Music does hold up. I'll watch that one all the way through every few years. Just cause it's pretty good.

It's a little bit strange to get a lead who can't sing, or at least isn't know for it -- she probably can sing and juggle (that's fairly basic actor training stuff), to play Mary Poppins.

You made me google Julie Andrews boobs and I had to see the old ones.

You owe me young Julie Andrews boobs.

khorum_sl said:

You made me google Julie Andrews boobs and I had to see the old ones.

You owe me young Julie Andrews boobs.

Click to expand...

pfft, they're still her bewbs, its all down hill once any chick has kids. unless they get implants.

Hey, those are still nice 1981 boobies. Vintage.

Iannis_sl said:

Poppins had the animation in it though. Van Dyke dancing with the penguins? Or am I thinking of Chitty-Chitty-Bang-Bang?

I haven't watched either one in ages. But yeah, Sound of Music does hold up. I'll watch that one all the way through every few years. Just cause it's pretty good.

It's a little bit strange to get a lead who can't sing, or at least isn't know for it -- she probably can sing and juggle (that's fairly basic actor training stuff), to play Mary Poppins.

Click to expand...

It was both. Mary Poppins is weird because everyone has nothing but fond memories of it. But if you watch it, there's like 3/4 of the movie that is just BORING. Even the music is like that. Everyone remembers OH ITS A JOLLY 'OLIDAY WIF MAAAARY!!! but no one remembers the songs about being a poor kid or the one about the dads accounting business or whatever it is.

j00t_sl said:

It was both. Mary Poppins is weird because everyone has nothing but fond memories of it.

Click to expand...

I hated that movie, and if you did, you are likely a gay.

Will they get people who can actually do a Cockney accent this time?

Seananigans_sl said:

I rewatched Mary Poppins for the first time in 15+ years about 6 months ago. It's really quite boring. Sound of Music on the other hand is fantastic, and I rewatch that around once a year. And yes, Andrews was hot.

Click to expand...

Just goes to show that Nazis make everything better.