Nature, Nurture and what makes us, us

ZyyzYzzy

Shitpost Counsel
<Prior Amod>
18,054
47d 1h 6m
Reactions
23,835 1,524 0 0
#1
I hear angrygerbil is generically predisposed to have a lower than normal IQ. Trisomy 21 or something.

Discuss.
 

khorum

Get Raped
<Donors Crew>
17,755
66d 5h 33m
Reactions
48,964 2,054 0 0
#5
Is this where I shank a bitch?
 

khorum

Get Raped
<Donors Crew>
17,755
66d 5h 33m
Reactions
48,964 2,054 0 0
#7
I have three grown kids. I have fulfilled my Darwinian duty and await my final turn at Hayflick's wheel.
 

khorum

Get Raped
<Donors Crew>
17,755
66d 5h 33m
Reactions
48,964 2,054 0 0
#13
I'll repost Cthonic's magisterial thesis on the subject before Jihodj unspools his fatwa tho:

 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Donors Crew>
25,226
14d 11h 49m
Reactions
8,008 1,849 0 0
#14
Like I said in the other thread, the Fst values between the various population categories one might attempt to divide human populations along in order to determine subspecies, simply do not rise to the levels that are recognized as required for subspecies classification in the non-human literature.

There is no such thing as human race as a genetic phenomena as a result.

I can cite you relevant literature from top experts in the fields of human evolutionary genetics if you need me to.

Start by looking into Svante Paabo's work at the Max Planc University in Leipzig for starting points.
 

ZyyzYzzy

Shitpost Counsel
<Prior Amod>
18,054
47d 1h 6m
Reactions
23,835 1,524 0 0
#15
So we got Holocaust denying eugenics believing posters. I'm actually not surprised.
 

Mario Speedwagon

Shitpost Plumber
<Moderation Tools>
14,121
17d 21h 36m
Reactions
40,628 2,093 0 0
#16
Like I said in the other thread, the Fst values between the various population categories one might attempt to divide human populations along in order to determine subspecies, simply do not rise to the levels that are recognized as required for subspecies classification in the non-human literature.

There is no such thing as human race as a genetic phenomena as a result.

I can cite you relevant literature from top experts in the fields of human evolutionary genetics if you need me to.

Start by looking into Svante Paabo's work at the Max Planc University in Leipzig for starting points.
Lewontin's fallacy dawg. Get rekt.

"black people smell different" - Richard Dawkins
 

AngryGerbil

PC NPC
<Donors Crew>
14,454
Reactions
17,635 1,034 0 0
#19
That's a great cartoon. I applaud it. As you may know from the various 'Fuck Islam' threads, I am all for having control of the cartoons.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Donors Crew>
25,226
14d 11h 49m
Reactions
8,008 1,849 0 0
#20
Lewinton's fallacy dawg. Get rekt.

"black people smell different" - Richard Dawkins
This actually isn't even about genetic variation when compared within populations and between them.

Its literally just when we compare two populations together, only like two or three very minor human populations rise to barely cross the threshold of the fixation index recognized in non-human literature. And when I say minor human populations, I'm talking like when you measure Fst value of something like Melanesians to Inuits or some shit. You end up with a value that creeps close to the non-human literature.

Also, the divisions we would commonly recognize can't work, because set theory means that, for instance, we're all Negroids by right of descending out of Africa. Those classifications only work with a multiple origination model, like those proposed based on Hamitic or degenerative theories found in Christian theology.

There is biodiversity and some continental inclustering effects, and we can see that, but it doesn't rise to the level of subspecies.

Especially since we can all interbreed. Like I can go anywhere in the world and fuck a human chick and knock her up and the children will be viable and able to reproduce. We aren't creating like Liger hybrids as humans.