Politics Thread

Dodsengel

Lord Nagafen Raider
130
5d 15h 14m
Reactions
407 25 0 0
Pelosi will be glad she has experience taking orders and sucking up to get a nice tip.

I will say this, while this girl is extra stupid, I full heartedly support some no name bartender sidling up to the electorate and knocking a several time incumbent and career politician who thought he had it in the bag off the primary.
 

Lithose

<Donors Crew>
15,466
30d 6h 50m
Reactions
38,696 967 0 0
Listen, you illiterate shit. I wasn't agitated before, still not agitated now - I'm just astounded at your blind stupidity at twisting words to fit your bullshit narrative that you want to present. You claim to be an arbiter of fact yet you can't even be bothered to read what someone is actually saying. Every time you distort a fact, you do damage to the entire credibility behind your assertion - literally setting up strawmen for your opponent to knock down.
 

Bandwagon

Drones and stuff
<Donors Crew>
5,087
21d 21h 15m
Reactions
12,814 2,240 0 0
See how agitated exhibit A is now Bandwagon Bandwagon ? He's attempting to explain his ridiculous exaggeration, and seeking some discourse to arrive at objectivity (A step in the right direction). But once more, I can only shake my head and laugh at how stupid comparing a football "block", not a tackle, which often imparts more force than a fucking low speed car crash and someone stepping in front of a reporter who was herself trying to block the Candidate. Now he'll claim he doesn't follow football, but that's crazy that he would use football hyperbole then to explain it--right? Almost as if the TRUTH did not matter, only the amount of exaggeration he could get away with. It was just a really crazy exaggeration, and if they make that kind of exaggeration, we need to hold them to their rules. If that was close to a "football block", then this is closer to a fucking judo throw than a polite touch.

Outrage is just like any other deal. You aim high, compromise down to well above what reality should be. Use their rules and strategies against them. This is the best power the disenfranchised cultural minority has--point out the natural hypocrisy of whoever is dictating morals (Because all heuristics will result in hypocrisy at certain times.)
You can write a fucking novel drawing parallels between the Acosta incident and the fall of Rome for all I care.

ANYONE that acts like this stuff is some kind of life-threatening attack is a juicy, gaping faggot, which is normally the realm of lefties. I understand that this still could literally qualify as assault in the courts, and that is also some juicy, gaping faggot shit. I understand that the left does this stuff frequently and that you get some satisfaction out of seeing it turned around, and that makes you a juicy, gaping faggot for failing to realize that the strategy is counter productive and there's numerous people like me that feel A.) Acosta deserves to have his press credentials revoked and B.) He didn't assault her.

I have no problem with mocking him about how they would handle that situation were the roles reversed. I have a problem with trying to play it off that way in all seriousness. It stinks like bullshit.
 

sadris

Vizconde de la Reino
12,848
30d 1m
Reactions
42,790 3,137 0 0
The average IQ of Baltimore is 74.

Beyond Reason: Mental Retardation: An Overview

The threshold I.Q. level for a diagnosis of mental retardation has been progressively lowered over the years, in part because of awareness of the damaging social prejudice suffered by those labeled "retarded." In 1959, the American Association on Mental Deficiency set 85 as the I.Q. below which a person was considered to be retarded.14 In 1992, the renamed American Association on Mental Retardation lowered the mental retardation "ceiling" to an I.Q. of 70-75,15 but many mental health specialists argue that people with I.Q.s of up to 80 may also have mental retardation.
 

Lithose

<Donors Crew>
15,466
30d 6h 50m
Reactions
38,696 967 0 0
You can write a fucking novel drawing parallels between the Acosta incident and the fall of Rome for all I care.

ANYONE that acts like this stuff is some kind of life-threatening attack is a juicy, gaping faggot, which is normally the realm of lefties. I understand that this still could literally qualify as assault in the courts, and that is also some juicy, gaping faggot shit. I understand that the left does this stuff frequently and that you get some satisfaction out of seeing it turned around, and that makes you a juicy, gaping faggot for failing to realize that the strategy is counter productive and there's numerous people like me that feel A.) Acosta deserves to have his press credentials revoked and B.) He didn't assault her.

I have no problem with mocking him about how they would handle that situation were the roles reversed. I have a problem with trying to play it off that way in all seriousness. It stinks like bullshit.
How is it counter productive?
 

Bandwagon

Drones and stuff
<Donors Crew>
5,087
21d 21h 15m
Reactions
12,814 2,240 0 0
How is it counter productive?
Because you don't even need to claim that he assaulted her in order to have the justification to revoke his credentials.

Making the assault claim makes it easy to attack Trump/Sara as snowflakes after seeing the video. I showed that to 4 people yesterday and all had the same reaction.
- He's acting like a dickhead every day.
After I showed then Sara's tweet, two people just replied with "lol" and the other two I talked to in person just rolled their eyes.

They'll be more support for booting Acosta out without calling it assault.
 

Dodsengel

Lord Nagafen Raider
130
5d 15h 14m
Reactions
407 25 0 0
You can write a fucking novel drawing parallels between the Acosta incident and the fall of Rome for all I care.

ANYONE that acts like this stuff is some kind of life-threatening attack is a juicy, gaping faggot, which is normally the realm of lefties. I understand that this still could literally qualify as assault in the courts, and that is also some juicy, gaping faggot shit. I understand that the left does this stuff frequently and that you get some satisfaction out of seeing it turned around, and that makes you a juicy, gaping faggot for failing to realize that the strategy is counter productive and there's numerous people like me that feel A.) Acosta deserves to have his press credentials revoked and B.) He didn't assault her.

I have no problem with mocking him about how they would handle that situation were the roles reversed. I have a problem with trying to play it off that way in all seriousness. It stinks like bullshit.
I agree with you. In my opinion, this is playing by their rules, plain and simple, which frankly I do not like. That said, I'm not sure I can agree it's counter productive, at least not yet. Revoking his press credentials for him being a jackass would have been sufficient in my opinion, adding this on makes it feel cheap and undermines his legitimate rudeness and lack of professionalism.
 

wormie

<Donors Crew>
5,534
35d 21h 44m
Reactions
5,849 600 0 0
Pointing out hypocrisy and ridiculing the other side for it is never counter productive.