Starborne - MMO4X

xzi

Mouthbreather
<WoW Guild Officer>
5,318
7d 16h 4m
Reactions
3,217 402 0 0
#2
was mildly interested for a minute and then they struck again

 

Kuro

Blackwing Lair Raider
3,086
20d 12h 32m
Reactions
2,270 71 0 0
#3
Will there be space orcs?
 

Noodleface

Delicious Noodles
31,437
14d 6h 26m
Reactions
7,805 1,247 0 0
#4
Is that a loot boxes? If so hard pass
 

Ukerric

Bearded Ape
<Donor All-Stars>
4,008
16d 16h 41m
Reactions
2,642 74 0 0
#5
Well, we can guess the business model then :)
 

uniqueuser

Lord Nagafen Raider
471
10d 11h 59m
Reactions
1,088 97 0 0
#7
Can't wait until loot boxes get regulated like gambling and a whole generation of shit games are no longer viable.
 

Utnayan

Troll Patrol
<Donor All-Stars>
11,500
10d 15h 20m
Reactions
4,160 1,018 0 0
#8
Better be free to play if they have loot boxes. And then I would bet it's pay to win. Too bad. Bye bye any game with a loot box.
 

xzi

Mouthbreather
<WoW Guild Officer>
5,318
7d 16h 4m
Reactions
3,217 402 0 0
#9
I'll still give it a try if it's free, half the allure of those games are because they're browser based for me to be honest, it's just more convenient than having a client but it's still a cool idea.
 

Byr

Molten Core Raider
2,171
8d 3h 45m
Reactions
593 299 0 0
#10
With Starborne being time-based and free-to-play, Solid Clouds has openly addressed understandable pay-to-win concerns, saying "there will be in-game purchases but, importantly, everything you can buy with real-life currency, you can gain with meaningful in-game activities."
Anyone who drops this line these days is sending up a big red flag.
 

xzi

Mouthbreather
<WoW Guild Officer>
5,318
7d 16h 4m
Reactions
3,217 402 0 0
#11
"Just play our game for 120 hours, or spend 2.89$"
 

zombiewizardhawk

Definitely Doesn't Do Meth
<Donors Crew>
6,268
19d 4h 7m
Reactions
7,425 959 0 0
#12
"Just play Everquest for 15,000 hours or buy my account with raid gear max level char in top guild for $2,499.00"
 

Ukerric

Bearded Ape
<Donor All-Stars>
4,008
16d 16h 41m
Reactions
2,642 74 0 0
#13
I'll still give it a try if it's free, half the allure of those games are because they're browser based for me to be honest, it's just more convenient than having a client but it's still a cool idea.
I probably will. It depends on the impact of the lootbox store.

From one of the videos, it looks like the guy got like 40 lootboxes over a day of hardcore playing, all of which give him 3-8 cards, which appear to be waaaay more than he can use, so he keeps the best. So a lootbox store may not be too unbalancing.

At worst, I play 2-3 weeks before dropping...
 

Skanda

I'm Amod too!
<Donors Crew>
6,662
0
Reactions
4,506 399 0 0
#14
half the allure of those games are because they're browser based for me to be honest, it's just more convenient than having a client but it's still a cool idea.
I never have understood this. What makes it more convenient to have it inside a browser vs as a separate program?
 

Fyff

<Donors Crew>
1,319
5d 3h 1m
Reactions
665 135 0 0
#15
I can play at work if it's in a browser?
 

Skanda

I'm Amod too!
<Donors Crew>
6,662
0
Reactions
4,506 399 0 0
#16
At least until IT blocks every last web page in the world... I hate the firewall at my work.
 

Ukerric

Bearded Ape
<Donor All-Stars>
4,008
16d 16h 41m
Reactions
2,642 74 0 0
#17
I never have understood this. What makes it more convenient to have it inside a browser vs as a separate program?
Browser vs static clients is exactly the same for games vs business applications:

- Easier deployment
- Multi-platform portability (including mobile)
- Fine-grained control
- And require only a single communication channel (vs some business tentacled horrors that require disk mounts, 2 different DB connectors, RPC, and some arbitrary fucked up ports using a protocol designed by an untrained monkey)

The downside until recently was that there were no real middleware to make web games, and the interaction was horribly primitive, barely above the level of text terminals. Which is why people wrote games mostly in flash. Today, you have JS+HTML5+CSS3+WebGL to provide the basis, and you get engines that can generate web applications that hold water.

One could probably make a Starborne clone entirely in HTML5+WebGL. Probably with a slightly more constrained display, but the only part that is "hard" in a web game version would be the starfield rotation and zoom, which is (mostly) fluff. They strongly imply they're going to release on Windows/OSX/iOS/Android, so I'm betting they are using Unity. Probably too big to run as a WebGL project, but not entirely impossible...
 

Fyff

<Donors Crew>
1,319
5d 3h 1m
Reactions
665 135 0 0
#18
The real benefit of not being in a browser is you are not just another of 500 million browser strategy games.
 

Ukerric

Bearded Ape
<Donor All-Stars>
4,008
16d 16h 41m
Reactions
2,642 74 0 0
#19
The real benefit of not being in a browser is you are not just another of 500 million browser strategy games.
90% of the browser strategy games are clones of Travian anyway. But apparently, the devs do explicitly reference Travian anyway :)
 

Ukerric

Bearded Ape
<Donor All-Stars>
4,008
16d 16h 41m
Reactions
2,642 74 0 0
#20
Video showing the lootbox and store: