Web Browsers

Araxen

<Donors Crew>
6,027
20h 32m
348
Reactions
1,535 155 0 0
#1
Firefox Quantum came out today and while it's fast, the browser is still a RAM hog. I have Twitch, FoH, and another website open in separate tabs and Firefox is taking up 2.3GB of RAM. Chrome usually only uses about 1GB of RAM. Did they forget to optimize RAM usage in this huge update?

 
Last edited:

Vepil

B a n n e d
<Donors Crew>
1,334
1d 16h 10m
378
Reactions
2,542 146 0 0
#2
Using Vivaldi with FoH, Twitch and FoxSports using 775 MB and that includes about 8 or 9 addons running as well. Once they add sync across multiple pc's this browser will be a winner to me.
 

Derkon

Knight of the Realm
1,231
18h 37m
103
Reactions
212 10 0 0
#3
Using Quantum now and it's pretty damn fast, strange thing about the RAM though.
 

gshurik

<Donors Crew>
1,363
3h 21m
428
Reactions
2,141 733 0 0
#4
I dipped into using Edge for a little while to see if I could get on with it, and I really hated it. I might try Quantum soon. Chrome has been pissing me off more and more recently, and I want a change.

Hows the addon support for FF quantum so far? I only really need ublock origin and lastpass atm.
 

Araxen

<Donors Crew>
6,027
20h 32m
348
Reactions
1,535 155 0 0
#5
I dipped into using Edge for a little while to see if I could get on with it, and I really hated it. I might try Quantum soon. Chrome has been pissing me off more and more recently, and I want a change.

Hows the addon support for FF quantum so far? I only really need ublock origin and lastpass atm.
Those two work with quantum.
 

Palum

Less Valuable Than A Visitor
<Donors Crew>
18,464
0
113
Reactions
21,656 896 0 0
#6
This just pushed to my pc today. Not thrilled about the giant fuck whatever you were doing update but whatever. I didn't really notice anything major yet performance wise. I'll take some time tomorrow to play around with it some more.
 

chaos

nazi mods fuck off
<Donors Crew>
15,045
1d 18h 25m
443
Reactions
2,049 183 0 0
#7
Benchmarks I saw guys posting on twitter had RAM usage for quantum at like half that of chrome. I planned on testing it out, having 75013498 chrome tabs open is really cramping my style.
 

Skanda

I'm Amod too!
<Donors Crew>
6,662
0
113
Reactions
4,487 412 0 0
#8
Firefox Quantum came out today and while it's fast, the browser is still a RAM hog. I have Twitch, FoH, and another website open in separate tabs and Firefox is taking up 2.3GB of RAM. Chrome usually only uses about 1GB of RAM. Did they forget to optimize RAM usage in this huge update?



That's Vivaldi running for me with a bunch of addons and 11 tabs open, which includes both Twitch and Youtube playing at the same time. I will include the caveat that I had just opened the browser a couple of minutes ago so it hadn't yet had the chance to load a ton of stuff into memory (if it does that) yet.
 

gshurik

<Donors Crew>
1,363
3h 21m
428
Reactions
2,141 733 0 0
#9
I've been using Quantum for a little bit now and it seems pretty good. It's definitely better than Edge (lol) and it seems on par with Chrome.

It's a lot more customisable which I enjoy, and I really like that you can finally turn off scroll smoothing.

Seems good, and is taking about 200mb of ram per page right now.
 

xzi

Mouthbreather
<WoW Guild Officer>
4,707
6h 5m
438
Reactions
2,520 357 0 0
#10
I don't like that there isn't a solid way to see how bloated an extension is without checking one by one.

Other than that, firefox seems to be taking slightly more resources that chrome for me even with all extensions disabled on both on the exact same webpages. Wonder what the deal is with that?

I like the browser though, I might use it. Just feels good.
 

suineg

<Charitable Administrator>
25,854
3d 11h 56m
893
Reactions
17,905 1,877 0 0
#11
How is FoH doing on it? Everything loading properly?
 

xzi

Mouthbreather
<WoW Guild Officer>
4,707
6h 5m
438
Reactions
2,520 357 0 0
#12
Yeah, everything seems to work perfectly fine. FoH logo is a little blurry it seems when it comes to the main page of firefox



But it's probably not noticeable until I just now pointed it out. Other than that the actual site itself seems to have no issue.
 

Noodleface

Delicious Noodles
29,800
8h 3m
803
Reactions
6,506 1,013 0 0
#13
In a world where I have 16GB ram on my home PC I couldnt give a shit if FF uses 2GB. I'm gonna try it out. Also I have a pihole setup that kills any ads on my network anyways so don't care about adblockers.
 

Hekotat

FoH nuclear response team
<Donors Crew>
5,992
2d 6h 13m
438
Reactions
2,767 201 0 0
#14
Vivaldi all the way.
 

xzi

Mouthbreather
<WoW Guild Officer>
4,707
6h 5m
438
Reactions
2,520 357 0 0
#15
Yeah, ram is hardly an issue but still they advertise that they use less resources than chrome an it's just not true (at least for a handful of people). My testing was done using pure versions of both, no extensions and the exact same webpages. But it still feels pretty smooth and fast so I'm gonna use it for a little while cause why not. Honestly I haven't used FF in years but the customization is what is keeping me.
 

Void

Hi Yukio!
<Donor All-Stars>
5,714
1d 13h 21m
348
Reactions
1,173 227 0 0
#17
I don't know what it is making me feel this way, but I'm really liking Vivaldi a lot. I haven't checked things like memory usage or other technical aspects, but it hasn't had any lockups like Firefox does after I leave it open for a week with a bajillion tabs open. That's a huge plus for me. And using it just seems really intuitive. They definitely need sync though, I miss that a lot. The fact that this is basically in its infant state, and I like it so much, really encourages me about its future. I will never fully uninstall Firefox until Chrome/Vivaldi get an exact duplicate of DownThemAll though, but it hasn't happened for years so I don't think it ever will.
 

suineg

<Charitable Administrator>
25,854
3d 11h 56m
893
Reactions
17,905 1,877 0 0
#18
Yeah, everything seems to work perfectly fine. FoH logo is a little blurry it seems when it comes to the main page of firefox



But it's probably not noticeable until I just now pointed it out. Other than that the actual site itself seems to have no issue.
the toolbar bookmark icon looks like shit now.
Yeah I don't doubt that, we are working with an icon not made by a professional team and it is low res but good enough.
 

xzi

Mouthbreather
<WoW Guild Officer>
4,707
6h 5m
438
Reactions
2,520 357 0 0
#19
Yeah I don't doubt that, we are working with an icon not made by a professional team and it is low res but good enough.
I have this one I made a while ago if you want it. Colors can be changed, obviously. NBD if not.

 

Koushirou

<Donors Crew>
1,119
2d 13h 12m
258
Reactions
1,132 92 0 0
#20
Anyone done any debugging with Quantum yet? Been playing with it at work today and while generally it’s fast as soon as I pop open dev tools it starts chugging.