The problem with this topic is if you listen to right-leaning podcasts you don't need some SJW hacks trying to explain law. Levin, Bongino, even Shapiro and the right in general have a background in law, or respecting, explaining and appreciating it, because the background of conservatives is the constitution and generally facts and truth, so they touch on aspects of law and legality all the time without having to separate it from their show or message.
On the right, you don't specifically need a separate production that touches on objectivity or facts, but meanwhile the left has to specifically come up with the novel idea that they'll do a show talking about things that should be objective, like law. And it's always ironically not objective, and instead dogshit.
Like the podcast All the President's Lawyers that I've tried to listen to or when the guys co-host appears on Left Right and Center, or literally any time NPR has professor's of law on shows to give their perspective and it's pants-on-head retarded spin how even if what Trump is doing is technically legal it shouldn't be suddenly (but should probably go back to being law when a 'real' president resumes office).
It would be great to have a show about law without shit-lib bias But it's not going to happen from shit-libs at this point, so not sure why someone would bother if the only drawback is the host sometimes can't hide their shitlib bias.
www.radiotopia.fm
Cad
go all lawyery.
