Search results

Taking bets on whether or not she wears a t-shirt to the Oscars thats says "Oscar is female."

I never had a problem with the first episode. I didn't mind the 300 style combat and was already familiar with (and a fan of) Andy from watching a movie called Gabriel, which I enjoyed.

What in the fuck is that thing? Does it even have a gender?

It could be good if the guys at CCP explain to the guys at PA what a fucking sandbox actually is.

Which reinforces my point. If we don't know a hero's powers, limitation, and weaknesses then how are we supposed to understand the stakes of the fights? From what I remember, Gamora combat skills and agility were her only real advantages in her fight scenes. But, like I said in the beginning...

Which is exactly why we need this movie to be, in part at least, an origin story. I guess I have to clarify that I am referring to the easily confused average moviegoer who has no idea who she is. For myself, all I really need to know is how they've changed her powers from the comics, which they...

Dammit, quoted my own shit instead of editing, cuz someone was yacking in my fucking ear. Please delete.

Holding a rock is hardly a super power. Groot is not a tree. Rocket's only "power" is fucking shit up with guns. Being a trained assassin is not a super power. I don't remember seeing anyone named Draxx. Not powered as in comparison to Captain fucking Marvel. :P

The Guardians aren't powered superheroes. Also, they're a team, the whole first movie was the origin of the team.

Probably less of that since it's "free" on Netflix. And, of course, horrible.

Yeah, I don't think the whole movie should be an origin story, but like, half or so of the first act would be fine.

Ugh. Brie is cute and all, but I've seen more curves on an action figure...of a man. Also, I hear this movie isn't going to be an origin story, which IMO is a bit of a mistake. It's not like CM is known at all outside the comics, what are they going to do? Give us a 5 minute exposition scene to...

He has an external hard drive that he carries in the mesh bag with the cash, you just don't really notice it and it's only mentioned once iirc.

That last clip was an homage to Andy. I didn't find it off putting at all.

Anyone who criticizes a game's writing using a phrase like "tonally iffy" should have their hands cut off. Edit: OMFG... "the source material, which is the tabletop board game Cyberpunk 2020."

Nice too see it getting ripped a new one in the comments for that article. Hopefully it will kill itself. With a katana.

They score zero points by choosing to target a single game and ignoring all the rest. It's just doubling down on the stupidity.

This gender choice shit is so fucking stupid it hurts my brain. These motherfuckers are so ignorant they don't get that at character creation you are choosing your avatars PHYSICAL GENDER, not SEXUAL IDENTITY. It's fucking simple, you get a dick or a cunt, period. Just like real life. And why...

Don't forget, after they killed the first boss, the companion dude calls the boss a pussy. Where's the outrage??

Wonky how? They aren't all the same, and the older ones weren't great, but The Division, for a recent example, seemed fine to me.

I wouldn't call it ruined, but personally I would have much preferred third person and had assumed it would be since W3 was. And I do think the "immersion" reason is bullshit. I've always hated first person, and the hand holding a weapon in the middle of my screen actually breaks my immersion...

Lol, there's nothing "Doctor Who-esque" about it, stupid of them to use that phrase. We've already had a bunch of actors play Bond, and if they killed him off and made a new character to be 007 that still would be nothing like Doctor Who. Closest thing would be if the new agent was female, which...

I don't think you realize just how huge that shirt is, shorts are pretty big too.

He does seem hard at first, partially because the room is so small, but he's actually one of the easiest. Just fight patiently, learn his moves (he only has a couple) and don't get greedy.

"Krull went through a very expensive, harsh and dangerous production process. The film's huge budget mainly came from the designers having to make numerous alterations to the sets." They spent an A budget making a B movie.

Being ridiculously overbudget due to sloppy production doesn't make it not a B movie. I watched it the year it came out, and it's always been one of my all time favorite movies (I still want a Glaive for Xmas), but trust me, it's a B movie.

Deathstalker 2 was better. :P Need a reboot of Hawk the Slayer as well.

He'd be much better off getting at least a 1060. I have a 1050ti and it's not as good as a 970. Other than less power consumption, less heat and being tiny. The price difference between the 1060 and the 1050ti is negligible considering the power difference. I really wish I had done that myself...

Agreed. Hard to call it a strategy game when the optimal strat is to always avoid combat. So, it's just find the loots, takedown the guards, hide the bodies, complete objective then gtfo. It makes pretty much every mission identical and just kills the replay value for me. With just a little more...

For anyone buying this (until the 21st) Christopher Odd has a GOG link on his let's play for 15% off. I still find the price a little high for an indie game, but there are just so few games of this type coming out now. You'd think with the success of Xcom there'd be more. I enjoyed Hard West...

This annoys me too. It's been getting more prevalent the past few years. Case in point, I just binged the first season of Instinct, typical formula show about genius male non-cop partnered with attractive female cop, which I enjoy when it's done well, Lucifer, Castle, Elementary, The Mentalist...

Unless you're using the weapon that body increases damage for, spear I think? Mostly all it does is add health, and at least in light armor, pretty much 1 hit from anything kills you once you reach a certain point in ng+'s. It's better to pump damage stats to make fights go faster. You only put...

Console version should still have the option to double the amount of turns, which is plenty of time unless you want to overwatch creep.

I played a handful of streaming games using OnLive when it was available. I never had any video lag or input issues when I played, and that was years ago. It'll be kinda fucked up if it ever gets really popular. If a large portion of the gaming population stops upgrading their pcs or buying dumb...

Actually, most of the hosts are designed to be victims. I don't see how you get the opposite idea.

So, we've come full circle. We've got a Robin Hood that's based on Green Arrow, who's based on Robin Hood. It's so meta. *yawn*

You think the gender fluidity shit is bad? Just wait til we're past that and it's all about species fluidity. You better believe all the furries are just waiting for genetic science to catch up. But, on topic, yeah, this is a dumb article. I don't understand why we're supposed to be catering to...

Ummm, soooo...A streamer who games 20,40,60+ hours a week and makes millions just needs an intervention and therapy/meds and they'll be just fine? Good to know.

Yeah, at launch all the side quest were such a long slog, you'd get back to the epic main story quest and be like "uhhh....what was I doing again?"