Search results

Nice. Got my legendary rubicite axe on the 4th try, but i have like 35 or so mithril picks so far, ugh.

Grats, man. That's really nice. I'm pretty sure that Exceptional is the best affix, since it adds to all 3 stats. The only thing that would've made that pick better (best) would have been a bonus to discovery. How many did you have to make before you got it?

Back in August it was stated that "EverQuest Next is targeted for release some time in 2014". After some poking around it turns out that in an AMA a couple months ago Smedley responded to a question about the release date with "not sure yet. Likely sometime next year." So it's been pushed back a...

Is there another reason to watch the show? Seriously, I really want to know.

Based on player reports, the increase from the bracer is unnoticeable. What will help you is crafting the top level of smelter and infuser. +3 for every 10 ingots/infusions. make sure to wear at least one Assessors Mark for the extra discovery, so you have enough elemental ore to cover the extra...

Seconded what? The stupidity? I wasn't called on shit. Of course some of the gameplay demo was faked. So what? A partially "faked" demo from 8 months ago is positive proof that there is zero development happening right now for a game they want to release this year? Please explain that reasoning...

Yeah, I'm the one shitting up the thread. I'll stfu, just for you. Because I respect your opinion so much. Did you have something to contribute to the discussion, or did you just stop in to amaze us with your valuable insight?

They were air quotes, dude. Chill the fuck out. You're absolutely fucking right, I'm sure the entire fucking EQN team is working on Landmark right now. I mean, why wouldn't they? I'm sure there's a ton for them to do in a sandbox game with soon to come rudimentary mmo features. You have...

You said it was faked. Now you're saying it was merely "simulated". Just like you don't think Landmark is basically (<---key word) an alpha for EQN, but you do think that there's been zero development on EQN while Landmark has been in development. The logic of your arguments is inconsistent...

Really? Thinking that the EQN gameplay footage from last year was faked, and believing that Sony is lying about EQN already being in development isn't a conspiracy theory? Ok. My bad.

Yeah, I know. It's just that it would be SO DAMN EASY to improve these scenes with the most minor of tweaks. Instead of carl-raper throwing away his hostage, have Carl elbow him in the nuts and get away from him. When Rick bites redneck, have redneck stagger back a little and squeeze off a shot...

And the reason behind your disagreement is a crazy conspiracy theory. Whatever puts the cream in your twinkie, bro.

Basically, I made a comment responding to some remark about how fast Sony was developing shit for Landmark. And then Lenas and I got into an argument where I state facts and logical reasoning and he responds with completely unsupported suppositions and assumptions.

You're "pretty sure"? How exactly? It's not your "lifeline". Your blood carries oxygen to your brain. If that flow is cut off completely, you do not die instantly. Your brain typically has to be deprived of oxygen for 20-30 seconds, at least, for you to fall unconscious, and then a further...

I'll promise not to insult your intelligence when you show me you have any. EQNext was in development before Landmark was even thought of. Ever hear of the chicken and the egg? Maybe you should do some more research. I assume you haven't seen the videos of EQN gameplay footage? Here, let me help...

When I said "systems" I wasn't talking about things like level progression, classes or any of that. You guys act like you don't know anything about software or mmo development. Geez. Yes, most of the "gamey" aspects of Landmark will be rudimentary dumbed down versions of what EQN will have. They...

It's hardly semantics when you can't comprehend the simplest of fucking sentences.

Which is then ruined instantly by having the redneck fall back and die helplessly. I know speed of demise is a fucking trope, but they could have at least had him fire a couple of wild shots that missed Rick. And in any case, I'd call that an action, not a scene. I much preferred the...

I find your lack of reading comprehension disturbing. Edit: In response to your edit: You're fucking dead wrong. I'm done trying to have a conversation with you. You're either ignorant or being deliberately obtuse.

I never said anything about EQNext content. Nor did I say EQN wouldn't have it's own alpha as well. Why don't you read what I wrote instead of making up shit? Landmark is a testbed for all the systems in EQN. The actual amount of development that is Landmark specific is tiny.

What are you talking about? You think the systems/assets etc that are being added to Landmark weren't developed first and foremost for EQNext? It's the whole fucking point of this project.

I can't for the life of me figure out why any of you think that scene was good. It was shit. Everything got dragged out too long, and even ignoring stupid tropes, everything about it was fucking retarded. Rick headbutts the guy, guy stands there for a loooong time, holding his fucking mouth like...

Eh, it's not all that impressive. Landmark beta is basically EQNext alpha. Most of the stuff they will be adding is pretty basic generic mmo shit, plus some level design dev tools. All hand me downs from EQNext development. I'm having a lot of fun, but let's be honest, they're basically working...

Patch notes. forums.station.sony.com/landmark/index.php?threads/scheduled-update-4-2-2014.29171/#post-328557

I'm hoping the super hot mechanic chick gets down to the surface, and takes over after the ugly blond girl gets eaten by gorilla men.

Ah. I see. Goatface left out a word, screwing up my math. Damn you, man.

Unless you absolutely don't care about which hero you get, it's always better to just save up enough splinters for the ones you want.

I wasn't referring to real world copyrights, and have no concerns about people copying a template by hand for their own personal use. I'm talking about, for instance, you build a marble corinthian column inlaid with gold and diamond designs, and put the template up for sale, for $2. It's really...

The only thing I've heard about royalties, is that if someone buys one of your templates (say for a tower) and uses it in a bigger template of their own (say a castle) then every time they sell that castle template, you get a royalty, percentage amount determined by how much your template was...

I have my doubts about this Player Studio/sell templates for real money thing. Unlike the real world, there are no copyright protection laws. There is nothing stopping someone from say, taking the top ten selling templates and copying them exactly and selling them for less. Templates do get a...

Real smart move to increase your population tenfold when you're stuck in orbit with limited resources. Guess birth control/condoms ran out early.

I sent him a green mithril pick earlier this morning to get him started, since I have 10 of the things now.

They said that dynamic water is a pain in the ass, so they are just adding static for now, with caves. Probably taking so long because it requires a complete restructuring of the islands. Iirc all tiers of resources will exist on every island also. Crafted a legendary rubicite axe this...

Your claim extends pretty deep into the ground. I dug a shaft to the bottom, and cleared out a nice sized area.

I am running a 660, and an i5. Nearly the same settings, except textures are lowered to high, and shadows are low, get steady 60fps. I also have my GQ set to medium, which seems to keep it from crashing as well as not taking up as many resources. Thing is, GQ changes something(s) that aren't in...

Or you running on Ultra? And if so, what's your vid card?

That's...unfortunate.

I know it uses Forgelight, dumbass. I didn't bother to read up on every detail of the engine, I have better things to do. The simple fact is that Landmark has the same resource hogging problems as EQ2, and I doubt that has anything to do with Forgelight. Sure, it will be further optimized before...

In the future, please assume that most people on this board are familiar with basic industry standard practices.

I don't know the specifics. What I do know is companies will often re-use in house assets to save on dev time when devoloping "new" software. When I say "foundation" I am referring to code that was probably transferred over to provide certain functionality's that they needed, rather then writing...