Search results

Maybe she didn't, or at least didn't think it would be this strong of a reaction. And I don't disagree with it being crazy that you have to cover your ass to such a degree. Whole thing is pretty absurd.

Not claiming it's a good situation or that she should have chosen to do things differently or that I disagree with anything she said. My point is just that she had to know that there was a good chance there was going to be fallout from it.

Yeah. If you know your employers are going to react a certain way if you do a certain thing, then either you don't do that thing or you deal with the fallout.

again that list was supposed to be about last season/now. not what players were doing 10 years ago. anyone that thinks alex smith/dalton are better than Jimmy right now should get tested to see if they have an extra chromosome.

That list is about right now, not 10 years ago. Well last season anyways.

ok as a 49ers fan if someone straight up offered to swap you andy dalton or alex smith for him on equal contracts you're saying yes?

i mean i get preferring young unproven but high potential dudes ahead of him. but even with that he's clearly not 30th. that's just stupid. that probably puts him 15-20 range, which is like i said good enough to win with a good team around him.

that list has alex smith and andy dalton ahead of him. lol.

That's an availability thing and not his actual skill level, there's no way there's 29 better QBs. But again, the health thing is a real issue.

having such an injury history as a mid tier dude is definitely a pretty big red flag.

Not sure about not top 20, but he's not top tier. He's one of those dudes that can do some work if he has a real good team around him, but he's unlikely to be the main reason why you're winning.

knowing that once Adam Viniatari turns in his retirement papers that you're older than every single player in the NFL.

Or maybe he just retires real early like Willis did

Boston fans now have to reconcile that the Sox are at least partially owned by a Laker.

Well he decided to become an enemy of the people I see.

it's like half of dalton's contract. he'll be tua's backup or watson's if that ends up happening.

Yeah, I mean it's still kind of dumb, but there's plenty of shit about superheros that is all just dumb as fuck to begin with.

sounds like he was willing to void his guaranteed money for release.

I mean all of that is the same regardless of when they trade him this offseason.

so are you going to explain how 21.6M is magically 67M?

Yeah. it's 21.6M regardless if they trade him, it just juggles where the 2022-2024 portions of the SB gets counted.

right, but that's all they're eating whenever they trade him. just that if they do it after 6/1 the prorated signing bonus shit gets shifted to the 2022 cap.

Right. You were saying that they save 10.5M this season if they wait till 6/1 to trade him. my point was that they'll have to take that 16.2m cap hit the following season.

that's for this season, that 10M would be a hit on the 2022 cap

It's only 67M if they cut him. IF they trade him it's 21.6M. Did you even look at your own link? If they trade him they're only on the hook for the prorated remainder of his signing bonus. All that other shit is from guaranteed money built into his contract which goes with him to the other team.

Honestly the Dalton thing isn't really that bad as a 1 season stopgap. It's not an actual solution though.

it's 3/16, which last time i checked is pre 6/1. do you not understand how dates work?

Reading is hard. It's pre 6/1 now. The numbers are different if it's past 6/1 and they save even more this year since a chunk of that would be deferred to 2022.

this offseason is wild.

I mean it's impossible to trade Watson so clearly he's the backup.

from your own link: So all that shit you were talking about 67M is only if they cut him. It costs them 5.66M to trade him over what his cap hit is if they keep him. They have 5.112M in cap space right now. So they'd need to free up 550K. not 67M. it's not very complicated. Again, this has...

They take a 5.66M bigger cap hit trading him than keeping him. They have 5.112M in cap space right now. They'd only need to free up about 550K to be fine.

So you're saying it's literally impossible for them to free up 550k more to trade him?

They'd only be eating 21.6M if they trade him. You don't seem to understand your own links. they'd only be eating that full dead cap hit if they cut him.

They have over 5M in cap space and it only costs them 6M more in cap space if they trade him, so like they'd have to free up like 5-600k only to make it work. Not even saying that they should trade him, but he's suggesting that it's literally impossible

So you don't think they can clear up the 500k or whatever the difference is if they trade him before 6/1? like if they really wanted to trade him, they can't because of 500k? that's preposterous.

i've been on the draft the best TE everytime I reasonably can in most fantasy drafts, the dropoff after the 2nd or 3rd one most seasons is just dramatic. even if kelce is a point or 2 less per game than whatever WR you can get in that slot, the WR you get 4 rounds later is going to be a lot...

damn that's a lot

the concaveness of the fez is disappointing even if fez in general are the best hats.

Pats going wild.