Search results

Shh. I'm blogging.

Lets start in on Volker, since Volker and Hill have been referenced as the CORNERSTONE of Hodji's beliefs. First is Volker's exchange in testimony, Hodji only referenced a single response, but here you can see no one had any idea aid was attached to anything! So weird! Ukraine didn't even know...

He's trying to avoid becoming my bitch, so yes. Fortunately I've decided to make this thread my blog thread. Going to be tight.

Well, so much for the cause being a lack of candor or self awareness. You can delude yourself Hodj. I will not let you delude others, especially after @TBT-TheBigToe made such an earnest and genuine post. Its terrible that such an honest admission was met with such disingenuous self rigtheousness.

In fact, I'll sweeten the pot. If I insult you, or don't provide a citation. I'll wear a "Lithose is a faggot" avatar for 6 months. We can appoint a council and I don't concede a fact, I'll wear the avatar--so the choice will not be in my hands.

No, I understand Hodj. I just want to disabuse everyone of the notion that it was some principle keeping you from this. You just don't care enough to get to the truth, and that's fine.

Hodj, I'm not insulting you. I'm telling you that I am willing to treat you with respect and have a formal debate. That's it. You've questioned my dignity and everything as reasons for not doing it. I don't want you to have that excuse, that's all. You can set the rules, and I will take the...

@Amod I think unless the person has an infraction for posting images, like porn in SFW threads--they should be able to post images. There you go Scream.

I'm willing to not speak a single insult, or quesiton Hodj's integrity in anyway. It will be a debate purely of fact. He won't though, and I've offered. He uses this defense because he doesn't want to get into the meat of the debate. Which is fine, but lets not get confused about him putting on...

This is sad, Hodj. You sound like a religious person now. Honestly, no trolling. To think you'd hide from a debate about facts with ad hominems or questions about the personality of someone. As said, I will only use citations from sources you approve. And we can select individual facts/topics...

Fiona Hill never said what Trump did was illegal. She said she disagreed with his policy position (Despite it being her position before he cut her out of the loop). Can you point me to that? Volker also never said that. In fact, he admits, as I quoted, that he agreed with the investigation...

Hodj Says: he does doesn't care; Hodj Does: Spends all day explaining why he cares and why everyone else is a treacherous piece of shit in his eyes. Hodj Says: If you investigate foreign corruption done by political opponent, its for personal interest and illegal! Hodj Does: Supports...

That's a lot of words to try and convince me you haven't been debating while positing about politics for a full day now, slugger. It must be exhausting explaining your double think. :(

Hodj: Believes its backwards people are skeptical of the CIA and State Department which have lied multiple times and resulted in the death of thousands of people. Thinks the right way to do things is to implicitly trust these and burn down Democracy to do what they say. Also doesn't believe he...

I want to debate, but fighting works. I get bored of being agreed with. You learn nothing when someone just agrees with you. I wish Hodj would give me something, some new way of thinking about this but so far he's been disappointing, especially for Hodj. Shit man, I never would have thought I'd...

Hey guys, I only recently began pointing out people hysterical about Trump were in a cult. Hodj has been paying attention. He knows. lol. Clown.

Does she have blue hair instead of orange?...The woman you sold your self respect to.

It is. :( Watching you shit on your own self respect as a skeptic makes me pretty sad, yes.

Can you show me where any declared victory? I'm just illustrating that the moment your point gets refuted, you quickly withdraw. People can make that of what they will, as can you. But it is the truth. You admit it, hell you've bragged about it for multiple pages with a religious like fervor...

No, it was lost to time :(

I offer to get specific, Hodj uses the excuse that its random flak. Double think its an element of...well, you guys know the rest.

Oh shit, I thought you ignored me again. But you couldn't accept your autism.

Who you liked or disliked does not matter. What matters is supporting the institution that gives YOU control over the government, you fucking fool. You can VOTE Trump out. You can't VOTE OUT State Department/CIA drone 01. Which is why they don't fucking set policy. Trump was adhering to a treaty...

Guys, the President won't support a regime crushing Democratic uprisings! SO EVIL! https://www.reuters.com/article/us-lebanon-protests/lebanese-protesters-clash-with-supporters-of-hezbollah-amal-in-beirut-idUSKBN1XZ013 Clown.

Yes. Turn off the bad man challenging your beliefs. :( Wouldn't want to question the double plus good narrative. We've always been at war with Eastasia buddy.

I think its fucking sad, no matter which side your on (And this is why I was against the GOP for a number of years and was a full on Chomsky-manufactured consent liberal), to side with bureaucrats who are not answerable to the electorate and who have been caught lying to pull us until regional...

Repeating mantra to avoid active engagement...check. Keep up your chanting buddy, I'll be here when you're ready. This is my home now.

And here we go, cognitive dissonance is a bitch. Its okay buddy, we can take this slow. As slow and as thoroughly as you want. Again, I'll only use citations your buddies in Academia will accept even. I'm here for you, you don't have to be their bitch anymore...friend.

Nope, just didn't see that post. I will ALWAYS respond to every point you make in depth if you're willing to engage, you can count on that buddy.

“In hindsight, I now understand that others saw the idea of investigating possible corruption involving the Ukrainian company, ‘Burisma,’ as equivalent to investigating former Vice President Biden. I saw them as very different – the former being appropriate and unremarkable, the latter being...

You're the one that has finally come close to admitting the double think, I just saw you were accidentally being honest for a moment and went for it. I knew you'd withdraw immediately once you cognitive dissonance made you uncomfortable, but its okay. This process is NEVER easy. Again...Biden...

Here is Biden confessing to it. Literally. But its a Russian hoax guys. Who is delusional again?

And that, my friends is where the cognitive dissonance grows too loud. Hodj: Believes investigating foreign corruption of a political opponent is de facto abusing your office for personal gain. Also Hodj: Thinks the Democrats investigating their political opponent for foreign corruption is...

Oh I know buddy. Its important to let the evil man who is challenging your beliefs know you're not fraternizing with him and you're a proud member of the good guys. I know.

No, its not. Its the fucking essence of the issue. This is what you said. Any president who uses taxpayer dollars to extort a foreign ally into giving him personal political favors meant only to help him against a potential rival in the next election should be impeached. Period. I totally...

Hit me with what I misrepresented buddy, I'll be happy to get specific with you.

Yes, and it took you MANY pages of active debate to get there. You won't commit to that here. Which is kind of the point.

So you believe investigations into corruption committed by a political opponent can only be seen as personal gain? Is that your stance?

The media said this about Trayvon Martin and "Hands up don't shoot". All you've linked is media interpretation and a single excerpt from Fiona Hill which doesn't claim illegality, it merely lamented the politicization of an ally. But as I showed you, Hill advocated just a couple years before to...