Search results

Done.

Does anyone know if the new bosses are quest state locked? Can you enter a portal for the Searing Exarch if you haven't killed Black Star? I've got 36 challenges done in HC but died doing the Elderslayers. No one in HC will run the fight because there's something wrong with the damage from...

Entire manifesto is pointless. They actually buffed ignite DD, the thing that needed nerfing more than any other.

2 of those 3 things you can buy from a bazaar/auction house type thing called a vendor.

May they find as much success as Edmonton had doing it.

You can't overmeld using the high value ones from each expansion. So the 36 from Endwalker and the 24s were from Shadowbringers.

Zone 3 of Zadnor was the quickest way to level to 90 before the patch. Could do 80-90 in 8-9 hours. Dungeon spamming is the new best way with the xp buff.

It reminded me of ARR up to level 88 or so.

Farmed my extreme trial weapon tonight. I must say the extreme fight is a lot more fun than the normal one.

If you had asked the entire player base where this was going back in ARR, not a single one would have come up with the answer.

Attacking a dummy works too.

The different expectations from different players. A million players want a million different things and companies do their best to cater to the largest crowd possible. Of course even that large crowd is a minority of players so most of the player base quit the game. It then becomes a perception...

Barnes was in close proximity to the case as he was representing other convington kids. He can't come out and say how much Sandman got because of Sandman's NDA but he's still telling us its a lot less than what has been reported in a roundabout way.

First, you need to get to trial in order to get to discovery. Barnes posits that the judge would dismiss the case very early on. He probably wouldn't even make it to discovery. He talks about settlements as well. A settlement is usually a fraction of what the claim is, is it even worth it? The...

Barnes and Viva went into things including potential defamation suits last night. Timestamped for the defamation stuff: tl;dw is that defamation is next to impossible for Kyle. He won't be able to show that damages were related to the reporting rather than the fact he was on a popular...

Are term limits really going to help? Seems like politicians would have a hard time being around long enough to build up a base independant from the party so most of their re-election funding would come from those purely partisan groups.

Every 4 years when the Dems fund them?

They used the high res footage in their closing argument. Thats what made them provide a copy to the defense and the whole thing to come up in court.

So we agree, thank you.

Would it even matter? Its still a statement of opinion. If I were on trial, news agencies would have to call me an alleged pedophile but that standard wouldn't carry over to random celeb A on twitter who reasonable people don't view as a news source.

You calling me a pedophile isn't a statement of fact. You haven't even tried to show its true in any fashion. You haven't even presented it as fact, why would random joe juror consider it one?

I also provided a link to why opinion would be a defense, examples of it being used and an expert who I assume we all respected given his stance on Kyle's case until now. Your turn. I'm very curious in your thinking. Why would a celebrity posting on twitter be considered a statement of fact...

So you can't actually argue why its wrong. Got ya.

Thats not very constructive. How so?

The problem is you'd have to prove they are acting in an official capacity, reporting news rather than opinion, on twitter as opposed to their broadcast where it should be more obvious.

And the networks would be a good target to go after. Some random guy on twitter tweeting the day after however would just be throwing money at lawyers.

Well they did call the verdict today which is more than we can say about you. You should probably pay some attention to what they are saying about their field of expertise.

Stupid enough that even the defamation lawyer on Rakieta says it will be next to impossible. I get it, you want this to go as well as the verdict today. Odds aren't in the kids favor.

Should probably include something relevant to what were talking about then, like: https://www.alllaw.com/articles/nolo/civil-litigation/defenses-defamation-lawsuit.html or examples of cases like when fact checkers were considered opinion pieces in the case of Candace Owens...

It being published doesn't eliminate the opinion defense. Opinion is the go to defense for all these claims for broadcasters and it will be one of the primary defenses to a defamation claim in this case. The only thing it being published changes is whether its a slander or a libel case and it...

Hard to sue for a twitter comment from these guys. It would just be dismissed as opinion.

The Arbery trial.