Search results

I know you don't any information that contradicts what you want to hear is stuff you ignore, that much has been clear from the start, that's also why you vehemetly oppose investigating anything involving biden and ukraine, a country that clearly had cia action involved in it in the period...

Trump attacked the one party "bipartisan consensus on foreign policy" to the core, the nato people especially freaked out about trump, the nato think tank atlantic council keeps coming up over and over again as a nexus for all the people you keep linking saying "trump is bad". It's funny how you...

svboda party in ukraine, the one that the obama admin backed during the coup, look them up sometime, they liason with miltia groups, look who they revere and honor a literal SS officer

someones getting ahead of themselves, I found a bbc article that quotes nytimes behind their paywall, it's in the "investigating" stage, that literally means nothing

not weird at all, they're all politically motivated to damage trump, that much is obvious, nobody gets the treatment in washington that these marked men do, if they DID then washington wouldn't be nearly as corrupt

no what biden did is worse, he helped cia takeout ukraine government with nazi militia's that enabled the chaos and embolded putin to take advantage of said chaos to take ukraine. biden is a root cause of the problem with ukraine

if he did anything and manhatten DA can prove it, it reflects very poorly on guiliani, given the multitude of boistrous claims and overstepping of bounds by manhatten DA in last several years nobody should hold their breath

headline indicates there was no business done, guiliani was corrupt because he provided to service to one client while doing nothing with another one?

asking you for facts is not evidence of not caring about facts, it's the opposite, i'm asking for more facts, what is the charge I can't figure it out based on information provided, what is the corruption? just cause you throw around a word doesn't mean you justified the use of the word, i'm...

you sure seem to get really mad when people suggest investigating what a public official did who also helped the cia engineer a regime change with nazi militia's nothing irregular about that

what did being paid for a service corrupt again? what did they get in return that made it corrupt?

says the guy who just spent 10 pages sperging out that investigating corruption involving biden is wrong

also hodj: " I don't care if the people that would testify to this effect are barred by democrats from testifying"

if you keep repeating this mantra it must be true!

I have yet to see integrity in you so why should I think you're some kind of expert who knows what you're talking about there?

misleading statement that is not neutral and presumes an answer that also requires mindreading on your part, evidence also suggests legitimate reason to look into corruption in persuit of lost US taxpayer dollars, previous regimes public servants heavily involved in area at time, it's in the...

directly relevent to style of debate you are using right now, witness testimony without physical evidence leads to witch trials like in salem

when they vote for a real impeachment and not a fake one then they can bypass executive privilege and not this kangaroo court we have now.

They just did that this year, I wonder what happened this year that prompted that action. also why where the cases shut down to begin with when shokin was verifiably persuing burisma (and privat bank the real target of corruption) before he was fired

oh but the denied witnesses you don't want to hear from them, just the ones you can potentially trap sophistry grade d+

How many people in history have claimed to see or hear from god? do you listen to them in blind faith without physical evidence?

there was many other witnesses requested that are denied volker also said alot of things that contradict democrats like aide wasn't heldup for investigation and it wasn't a probe into biden as a political stunt but about corruption you can't cherry pick what you want to hear from volker but...

plenty of people do so it's clearly false statement, it's also not evidentiary in any way shape or form, sophistry grade C-

hard to read with a paywall no reason given no identity far as I can tell, correlation and causation sophistry grade b-

he said asserting without evidence, appeal to authority sophistry grade C

all of this is true and documented in public record your sophistry grade is F

paywall, seems to indicate nothing happened by title

US taxpayer money was lost in ukraine, your money, biden was heavily involved in ukraine government at the time when money was lost

let's see if you link more neo cons who are "just asking questions" and are "concerned" in the future

got anymore neo cons you want to "share their thoughts"? you're being manipulated by warmongers who want to perpetuate death and destruction, i'm trying to help you

funny how you reacted so negatively when I said you where just linking neocon talking points then link one of the top neo cons in history

bill kristol? is jennifer rubin next on the spam list after your done with a few more occupy democrats posts?

copious means nothing, when it's literally all selected by dems who won't let any rep witnesses take stand and they're all partisan actors with ulterior motives. "already PROVEN to be completely just" is just blatant lie by meth head your sophistry grade is d+

that's not double speak I was specifically retorting your enfatitic statement previous to mine that meuller had NEVER looked at his statements, I merely pointed out they were a matter of public record so that portion of your statement was clearly false. Your sophistry grade is F

the financial statements are all public, that 100% was looked at, you get more desperate everyday sophistry grade c-

those are not mutually exclusive statements, ukranians came to guliani in dec 2017, years before the phone call, he wasn't directed to do anything. sophisty grade d-

meuller had his tax returns i'm sure he would of acted on anything substantial, "irregularities" is vague language for rubes

IF you're so confident then an election should be 1 sided in your favor and you have nothing to worry about

You possess neither of these qualities and actively make a world with less integrity and honesty.

The information that shokin wasn't working on the case if you track down the quote was provided by shokins rival, in ukraine there's atleast 2 factions fighting eachother so you contradictory information, what's not contradictory is shokin was activley working on the case shortly before he was...