Search results

Is somebody keeping track somewhere of the new rules we're going to have implemented the next time that's an option? Here's one suggestion: Tanoomba, and only Tanoomba, is not allowed to post in his own defense, regardless of what anybody says about him and how detached from reality it is...

Please keep your whiny bullshit about me in this thread. The community wants the GamerGate thread to remain on topic. Also, I like how you have your own personal definition of what constitutes "logic". Do you agree with it? It's logical! Do you disagree? It's illogical! How delightful that you...

You didn't "trigger me, you nitwit, you insulted me for no reason (seriously, there was ZERO connection between me and your shitty point) and I defended myself. Of course, even defending myself HAS TO lead to a dogpile where people keep attacking me personally (because God forbid anybody carry...

No, seriously: Go fuck yourself. The GamerGate thread has become the "bitch and whine about Tanoomba" thread, and everyone is allowed to shitpost and spam garbage to their heart's delight, but I'm not allowed to respond to any of it even though it's explicitly about me. Again: Go fuck yourself.

Zapatta continues to prove he is incapable of understanding clearly-made points.

It really, really is. SURPRISE! Being an asshole has consequences when it comes to getting public support!

Damn straight.

That's right, Zyyz, show them how devout you are.

Why would I be frustrated? Stumping you guys brings me great joy. You can play the "we're just not taking you seriously because you're gonna troll us" card all you want. That in no way changes that my last few stances were logically sound and you had no way to counter them. Again, avoiding...

Thanks to the GG crew for the content-free shitposts. If you're ever capable of actually countering what I say, please feel free to do so. In the meantime, I take pride in the fact that you have nothing.

I take it you don't understand how hypocrisy works?

I'll take "Things Tanoomba has never said nor implied" for 500, Alex. RIGHT? Thank you for actually making a reasonable post, even as everyone else strives to be as unreasonable as possible.

...I'm waiting. This is me actually reaching out for information instead of rejecting it outright. I very much WANT to hear your side so I can understand it. What did the article get wrong?

Oh, no, Cad. I noticed the way you guys acting being parallel to the supposed "new religion" many times over now, this is just the latest time. And fuck you for pretending it isn't 100% apt. You guys don't give a shit about the facts. You don't care about what's true or not. You have zero...

The new religion.

It just doesn't make any sense. Mao makes this post in the GG thread: He's clearly pissed. He's angry that people (apparently his Facebook friends) took that article "as gospel", so I read the article fully expecting it to be full of exaggerations, inaccuracies and outright lies. I could not...

Whatever keeps you coming back.

The post wasn't for him. It was for my fans. one of the benefits of visiting my clubhouse is learning more about what I like. Also... This!

Outstanding post.

As long as it keeps being this fun!

It wasn't subjective. You don't get to disagree. :p

I didn't make a semantics argument. I have already clarified literally three times exactly what my point was. a_skeleton_03 and Khalid attempted to derail it into a semantics argument completely unrelated to my point. Get your shit together.

Dude, "bringing her into it" fundamentally means "making it about her". Obviously, you don't see it that way. I honestly don't care and have zero interest in this semantics argument, especially since my point was that Khalid's condemning of people using "Trump supporter" as justification for...

I disagree.

I mentioned her name as an example of something someone could be perceived as supporting in order for any way they are treated to be considered "earned". The discussion is in no way about her. We are not discussing her. How much clearer can I make it? How many arguments with me devolve into...

Ah! You seem to be under the mistaken impression that criticizing you when you get something wrong = defending her. Don't worry, people get those two mixed up all the time. Glad I could straighten you out!

Addressed already.

Look guys, I got Mario to play the troll after I corrected his false statement! Nope. Have you always been a compulsive liar, or I do I just bring out the worst in you? Is it worse than you ASSUMING someone will key your car? Also, can you back up your claim with statistically significant...

I probably make a fraction of what you make and I wouldn't change places with you or anybody else on this forum in a million years. Awww... I hurt poor widdle Khawid's feewings, so he's twying to get wevenge by lying about me being a conspiwacy theowist again...

I've never supported her. Not financially or otherwise. I've never promoted her work or pushed her views on anyone. That's why I used the word perceived in my post. See above. Also, you're an idiot. "drags her into every conversation you can and defends her against any charge no matter the...

You think that's bad? On FOH, even being perceived as a Trump supporter (regardless of the accuracy of that perception) means you deserve anything that could come to you and all bets are off. ...Oh, wait. Did I say Trump? I meant Sarkeesian.

As much as I appreciate all the work you've done (and I do), I'm not exactly striving to be more like you. I'm OK with unpopularity being the consequence for bearing uncomfortable truths. Thank you for the offer of guidance, though.