Search results

Too many pixels for this case. That's more like it.

Goddamn that's an ugly suit on Nu-Morpheus.

Ronald "Chad Chaddington" Goldman

The day's affairs are over and we're stretching in to day three. As a tangent OJ Simpson was found not guilty after three hours in a trial that went on for over eight months and ARKyle is moving on to day three. Video of the results -

Next season you'll get a light to moderate balance pass. The season after that you'll get all kinds of crazy shit.

This kid is going to end up eating some lesser charges on a piece of video that showed up out of nowhere in the final days of the trial so the prosecution itself could argue that some of these pixels we magnified show Kyle pointed his weapon at a dude we're not calling to the stand thus allowing...

If I had a nickel for every direct lie told by the prosecution this trial I'd have a shit load of nickels.

"It's unfortunate that I sent you the shitty footage your expert should have realized that it's not the state's responsibility to send proper evidence."

"The detective did it." Well we've still got the creation date as per the file's metadata so try again also you just said that everything that wrong was the defense's fault and now everything is the detective's fault?

I want to see Fatlock get sworn in and answer the question "why did you send the defense a 4mb file you created that day instead of the actual footage requested."

"Your honor, I'd like to address one piece of the defense's motion if I could" -Fatlock

The metadata on the file the defense got has its creation date and that date does not match up with the file of the proper high quality footage.

The best I can do is this - Fatlock was going through that footage he had back and forth over and over, fucking around with it a bit, didn't know what the fuck he was doing and thought one file was just as good as another. Yeah, those are all the same files. Oh wait, they're not? Fuck. It...

I've got the email he sent. It's 4 mb. It has a different title. edit - and they tried giving the defense that same 4mb file three times.

That's going to be such a silver bullet. You attached a 4 megabyte file and that is not disputable and you told the judge you only had one file which is not true.

This lady is killing it at least. She's still got the emails with the files attached of the wrong size.

Remember when he accused the defense of taking advantage of the judge's poor understanding of technology? He's doing the same thing now in reverse. Judge! We don't know how this compression wizardry works! My god man, I'd have a better job if I did!

"we don't know to compress files" Shoot me now.

We don't even know the rules for how a jury can review video footage.

The commentary from these lawyers is enough to turn your shit white. Here's some anonymous drone footage. Was it tampered with? Don't know. How did you get it? It was given to me. I'm not saying it happened here but the FBI could use their massive resources to fiddle with a piece of footage in...

It's also gaslighting. This case has some real fucking problems now and what we're going to here is "well so what I heard this was biased towards Kyle and he still lost."

Yeah, it's the silver lining.

No one even knows how to do this by the numbers. The judge doesn't know. The prosecution and defense? They don't know. How is this uncharted territory? The jury wants to watch footage and they're arguing about - 1. Where can they watch it 2. Who is in the room while they watch it 3. How many...

I really wonder if this case is a little microcosm of how digital footage gets used in criminal trials all around the country. The software says it's for investigations only, we're claiming magnification algorithms that add and color pixels don't add detail, the defense gets some footage by...

Fatlock said something along the lines of "our video is better than that" in regards to the footage the defense was using so I think the prosecution's stuff was all the higher res footage. They showed a bunch of snipets and I'm not sure anyone knows if every single thing they showed was from the...

I'm still flabbergasted he got up there and told the jury to their faces that you wave the right to self defense if you're the one that brought a gun.

The jury comes back, it's some guilty charges, the judge then sets aside the verdict and we're off to the races. Honestly this is the first time I've thought we were really in for some retarded fucking shit out here. There are outcomes on the table that I was not prepared for.

The prosecution got hit really fucking hard over the "why did you plead the fifth if you were going to tell your story now huh" bullshit. It doesn't seem impossible that the withholding of video evidence is going to tip the scales. What a fucking shit outcome that is though. It's good for Kyle...

Exp bonus all day every day. Aside from faster = good you're never going to have that spot where your quest like is desolate but moving to a new area feels wrong. Instead of not enough quests you'll have a surplus and can basically go where you want.

Anyone get an action bar addon going? I'm looking for a version of bartender4 that is compatible but will accept dominos if anyone knows

Look. A mistrial is going to enrage the same cowards that threatened you. You can do the right thing or you can try and capitulate to the people that came in to our city to burn it down.

If you had a 10/2 split and there was just no agreeing about the facts of the case and it drug on and on than that is one thing but if you've got two jurors saying they fear for their safety if they don't convict that has to be a different animal.

It's not the best news but it's second cousins to the best news.

https://www.wicourts.gov/services/juror/glossary.htm

You are a bad person also

This one really caught in my craw. The expert the prosecution put on the stand said he used this software all the time. Fatlock argued it was common and the usage peer reviewed. It says in the training material it's not suitable as evidence? How many fucking people had this shit used against...

Honestly that's better than anything I came up with for trying to convince Karen, something along those lines. Going to be a lot of "no one told us the dude thirsting after Kyle was a child rapist wtf" when this is all finished and the jurors go home.

I was thinking about how you would try and convince someone with a "he shouldn't even have been there" opinion and I couldn't come up with anything that I thought would work.