Search results

Sorry for the spike in volume.

I don't think of the Westboro Baptist Church. Those are the "God hates fags" idiots, right?

Ignorance is bliss, I guess.

Doc: "I thought about reading this but then I didn't." I find it odd how proud you are of being ignorant. "Didn't read! WHEEEEEEEEE! I have no idea what you're talking about but you're wrong! WHEEEEEEE!"

Khalid: "Good to remember that Tanoomba, even from his very first post and disagreement, has had his arguments thoroughly rebutted. Yet continues to claim..." What's been rebutted? I guess you haven't been paying attention. Here was Lithose's claim: "meanwhile, you can find 2-3 dozen...

Lith: "Oh, Tan. I feel so bad for you, I thought you had forgotten about that embarrassment. But here you've been dwelling on it for a while haven't you? Even after all these months though you still haven't been able to convince yourself of your own argument? How sad. As for me, I feel no need...

Ah, good, I was hoping you would drop in to defend you dishonesty, Lithose. Anything, ANYTHING but admit you were exaggerating, right? Up is down, black is white, whatever you need to do to make sure you don't have to admit to being wrong about something. "meanwhile, you can find 2-3 dozen...

Thanks for dropping by, Drins.

Lurkingdirk: "And yet everyone but you think's you're bat shit crazy." Appeal to majority. Try logic and reason instead. It's good to be open to new experiences.

Since you're a lazy fuck, Doc, I'll do a little digging myself... OK, so my first contribution to the GG thread was actually a continuation of an argument with Lithose that started in the Butthurt thread. Lithose was talking about how the mainstream media portrayed Sarkeesian's work. His...

Lots of talk, zero facts to back any of that shit up. Par for course. What did I get wrong in my rebuttal to the article? I gave credit where credit was due and acknowledged what the author got right. I explained rationally, using nothing but logic and reason, what he got wrong. So what's the...

Doc: "I can't think of a single good reason why I would waste my time doing that. You are the only person that doesn't realize you're wrong." ANNNNND the cycle continues. ... Coward.

Doc: "Literally backed up by over a year's worth of posts from at least 15-20 different people." Then it should be easy to find an example of a statement I made being proven wrong. Go ahead and choose one, I'll wait.

AngryGerbil: "Snivelry." You know what? I think I've been polite and giving the benefit of the doubt for far too long. I'm going to start taking baseless, content-free posts like this for what they are: Admissions of defeat. Better luck next time, Gerb.

Doc: "I actually read your post. It was shit. If you'd like to know why, feel free to reread the gg thread where you've already made all those arguments and had them refuted, and then proceed to never post about Anita again. Thank you for your cooperation." More baseless statements backed up...

That was a good read, Soy, thank you. Adrian makes a few good points, but he still gets quite a few things wrong. All right, you knew this was coming: The good: - He acknowledges that Thunderf00t is wrong about some of his bullshit. - He agrees that many people "focus on minute details...

I know, I know... "Didn't read."

Will the circle be unbroken?

As a person who eats, that annoys the fuck out of me too. It may not be art, but it's tasty as fuck and you leave satisfied.

Shit sorry,I was beat to it.

Well played.

Now I loved Metal Gear Solid, LOVED it. On a whim, since part 5 is coming out soon, I decided to check out Ground Zeroes. Only ten minutes into it and I'm already getting frustrated. Dealing with every button on an already complex controller having multiple functions may be the standard for...

Khalid: "I'm not making baseless statements. You haven't been able to engage anyone on this topic without driving them away or them dismissing you for the last 2 years on this forum. This is a fact, as at least partly evidenced by you hiding in the shaw." You bet your ass you're making...

Khalid: "You haven't engaged in good faith on this topic in 2 years. If so, you wouldn't be "the only one willing to engage in a conversation" on the topic." Stop just making baseless statements. Back your shit up or shut the fuck up. It's not complicated. I've made my case and have proven...

Sure, but could they back it up? That's the part you keep ignoring.

Khalid: "See, this is what I'm talking about. You want us to repeat the same arguments that you have repeated for 2 fucking years now. You are like a crack addict with Anita. You keep needing your fix of defending her. I'm not going to feed into it bro. Take a step back, its not too late."...

That's what I thought. ...Bitch.

Doc: "An out and out lie and anybody that participated in these threads knows it. You are a liar Tanoomba." Prove it, bitch. You love to talk the talk, but that's all you do.

Khalid: "Sorry bro, your arguments are absurd because they have been torn apart countless times. I am not going to repeat them here, you are deaf to them. I'm done trying to convince you on this topic, I just want you to realize you need to move on. Christ, when people start busting out cheese...

Bisi: "-Anita, talking directly out of her asshole. Maybe it's impossible to quantify because it's shit pouring out of your anus? "Hey guys, I don't have any data on this, but let me talk as if I do"" So Sarkeesian says something and thousands of men chime in with "See? She's just...

Games are an interactive medium where the entire experience is based on how you interact with them. The line between what you are "allowed" to do and what you are "encouraged" to do is not as clear-cut as it is in other situations. When you play Super Mario 1, are you "encouraged" to press right...

Khalid: "No no no, YOU look at them and think they hold no weight, yet everyone on this forum outside of Itzena, you, Heckler and Delicateflower found the Hitman examble a clear misrepresentation." They've been proven to hold no weight. I have shown that many times over. Not my fault people...

In before "Didn't read".

Sorry, Soy, you're objectively wrong here, as has been shown. We can put every phrase where Sarkeesian uses the words "encouraged" or "invited" and, AT BEST, all you can say is "I disagree". Has nothing to do with her misunderstanding anything and everything to do with you deciding a point...

Soy: ">Implying that the Hitman subjected hasn't been discussed to death on this forum already." Yeah, and how many times did people bring up that it was wrong to say the game ENCOURAGES you to take out NPCs when it EXPLICITLY DISCOURAGES YOU!?!?!?!? Meanwhile, the game both implicitly...