Search results

Annnnnd Lith has gone full snark again. Guess that means you're out of ammo. I don't blame you. It's hard to continually try to equate racist hate speech with a leaked sex tape.

Irrelevant.

Dr. Mario: "Guys I want to talk about whether or not Anita was talking about hitman. It's been so long since I've slammed my dick in a drawer." Oh, come on. I'll bet it's been less than a week since you slammed your dick in a drawer.

Quaid: "I dunno. You didn't seem to have a problem with Anita Sarkeesian doing it with Hitman." Doing what? Hitman was a valid example of a game containing the trope she was describing. Anyway, it seems like you're getting closer to agreeing that the "quitting Reddit" article is about racist...

I didn't ask if he was defending free speech, I asked if he was defending racist hate speech. Defending gun ownership is not the same as defending gun murders, you tool. Quaid: "to demonize both the creators who make products, and those who consume them." ...Seriously? *face palm*

Iannis: "There comes a point where you actually can start to believe your own bullshit. It's why it's important to stay grounded and social, and why the echo chambers are dangerous." Absolutely! Iannis: "Take Tanoomba. That motherfucker is criminally god damn retarted, but he's not...

Cad: "I'm not saying white supremacists are right, I'm just criticizing black people! There is a difference! I'm not saying wife beaters are right, I'm just criticizing the wifes behavior in this domestic abuse case. There is a difference! I'm not saying the cop was right, I'm just...

"The practical reality is that Reddit seems to have overtaken Stormfront as the world?s largest White Supremacy community. And thus, every page view turns into some fraction of a dollar that powers a server that hosts hate." "Hate for me and my children. Hate for my great-grandparents coming...

Quaid: "Whether or not that sexual violence is a hate crime is irrelevant." It's relevant when the claim being made is that it is hypocritical for a Gawker author to take issue with Reddit profiting off of hate speech. While Lithose has since muddied the waters by using increasingly nebulous...

Soygen: "Defending Gawker is truly a low point for you, Tanoomba. May God have mercy on your soul." For the second but almost certainly not last time, I am not defending Gawker. I am criticizing Lithose. There is a difference and one does not necessitate the other.

Ridas: "You are the only one, who thinks that reasoning is ridiculous, Tan." No doubt. I'm also the only one not succumbing to confirmation bias in order to stick it to Gawker.

Cad: "Reddit was a free-for-all. When you give people free reign to say whatever they want anonymously and consequence-free, you're going to get some disgusting and hateful behavior. So?" So that's what the article Lith claims is hypocritical had a problem with. The author didn't approve...

Intrinsic: "That and he's already fallen back to the 'no no it has nothing to do with what I believe! We're talking about something else!' defense. Usually takes a few pages to get that desperate." "Already"? Bitch, I am contractually obliged to OPEN with that statement, otherwise I have to...

Lith, as I already said, the author of that article comes off a little heavy handed with the "sexual violence" metaphor. I don't believe it is meant to be taken as literally as you seem to think. Having said that, it is an article about sexual violation, not about hate. You seem to think the two...

Lith: "Hate and hate speech were use interchangeably in the article. This really comes down to whether you consider sexual violence and gang rape to be "hate". If so, Gawker hosted hate...it's pretty clear." Why would what I consider even be relevant in determining hypocrisy on Gawker's part...

Lith: "So, Tan...Lets just be clear, Violence against women does not equal hate? (The author in the original article referred to it as "hosting hate", not just hate speech). I'm just curious buddy, is attacking and violating women, to you, not a hateful act?" Looking at naked celebrities is...

Cad: "His point was about gawkers hypocrisy not whether or not either the Fappening or Hulkster was hate speech. Either they both were hate speech or neither of them were, because they were both the same fucking thing. Gawker just bandwagon hates on one because it involves females and thinks...

Radditsu: "Holy crap dude. Seeing nudes of J-law and the hulksters Wang is the same fucking thing. One article they are laughing it up (hulk) the other they are shaming humanity for daring to look at one of the hottest(personal opinion) woman alives cooter. There is no amount of mental...

Quaid: "Complains a poster is arguing semantics. Argues semantics. That's our Tanoomba!" Say Quaid, do you think Gawker would consider either the Fappening OR the Hulk sex tape "hate speech"? (I'm sorry, I know I present you with these not-really-ultimatums once in a while, but it's...

OK, so I read the article, and noted: a) It did NOT claim revenge porn is hate speech. b) It did NOT explicitly refer to the fappening as "revenge porn". It DID refer to "revenge porn" twice, both times quoted by you. The first has a clear "or hacking", implying that while the Fappening...

Dick Van Dyke is more vaudevillian humor/physical comedy. The only thing absurd about him was his cockney accent in Mary Poppins. Lithose: "I mean, some people might argue Hogan's tape is not hate speech--but according to Gawker, "revenge" porn is a kind of hate speech. (And they...

Damn straight it is.

AngryGerbil: "If Carlin saw the shit you post on here he would laugh his ass off." So... At least I'm funny?

"My penis! It burns!" -AngryGerbil

Aladain: "You know full well I was not talking about a blanket of "online behavior" as you tried to "catch" me on such a broad and simplistic term. I said then and I'm saying now that I am talking about something very specific. I'm talking about Harper for example, who are consistently...

Iannis: "Look at Tanoomba. That's the footsoldier, basically." My schtick has pretty much been pointing out ignorance, hypocrisy and outright idiocy in the anti-SJW crowd (specifically, here on Rerolled). Believe it or not, that doesn't actually make me an SJW. Aladain: "I think it's...

We all like zingers, even SJWs. I just think it's ignorant to criticize your perceived opponents for behavior that is just as prevalent within your allies.

Prodigal: "Hell, I'll bet a significant percentage of these McIntosh clones grew up in a household where they had a stay at home mom who watched Geraldo, Montel, Ricky Lake and their young minds picked up debating tactics early on - shout really loud, insult those you disagree with, and throw in...

Maester Chuk is rape culture.

Dunno who Excelsior is. Why don't you ask him? Gavinmad: "I mean, I get that you're just a half-assed troll most of the time, but I'm attacking the author and the content of the article, I'm not defending Cosby." Hmmm... Very interesting.

As I have already explained, Mire and Marmac are RL friends of mine. I've known Mire since high school and Marmac since birth. I often post from Mire's house where I hang out regularly. The three of us have entirely different posting habits that reflect the entirely different interests of...

Edit: Randi. Sorry, never heard of her until Rerolled.

How about that Randy Harper, huh? She sure is unattractive! What a large and unattractive woman, amirite?

No matter how many times the mods confirm that my suspected alts are not, in fact, my alts, morons keep insisting on believing that shit. I hate even addressing this. Why the fuck do I have to defend myself because some random people I haze zero control over arbitrarily remind you of me in...

Nice, Lurkingdirk! That's creative thinking! I'll give you points for that. See, the thing is the public has already decided I should not interact with the commoners. I originally took issue with this but have since found out it works out better for both sides. This is the one legit thing I...

Quaid: "The mods here are far more patient that I would be. If you spammed my phone with bullshit during work hours I would ban you without hesitation." I might, too. Wasn't bullshit, though. The actual spamming was in the GG thread.

Santa: "'I abused a function that caused actual RL annoyance (likely at work) to people who volunteer mod this forum, but isn't it really their fault for not addressing my petty grievance immediately?' Such self-serving delusion. Ban this limpdick and all of his alts. Set a precedent for...

Cad: "Calling you a Tanoomba alt is just our way of making up a new dismissive label so we never have to do any critical thinking, ever." Cad gonna Cad.

Don't mass shitposts deserve mass reportings? Skanda: "SJWs drive someone to suicide" Ahhh, SJWs... They're whoever you want them to be! Do you think rape is a problem? That's fine, but if you don't join in on the false rape accusation witch hunt du jour (even if there's no evidence...

I get it. The warning was justified and, had it been noticed, would have stopped further reports. I do find it strange, however, that while several mods' phones were ringing left and right, causing no small annoyance, not a single one thought to address the actual shitposting problem. There...