Search results

Jeeze that's sad, also this from the article.

What if they nerfed the blood drinker card what would that force the deck into using?

Bill Walton, Hakeem Olajuwon

I was talking about obama's kid you self centered dumbo

No that's just confirmation bias in your head, humans are pattern seeking animals they see patterns in all kinds of things, entrails of animals, flights of birds, just superstitious nonsense.

This is actually a good watch, it's extremely meticulous and informative in it's own right.

You could pay to draft and keep what you drafted for constructed. You'd actually use the crap that's not fit for constructed while you drafted though.

Or you know, have a draft format so you can use the cards. That would make the grind so much more tolerable.

How was the bomber using violence to bring about political aims again?

I rest my case

TL;DR summation of what tanoomba said

This is funny, this is where you have to pretend that it's a super serious things she's talking about while also ridiculing it as a nothing. You're being inconsistent and split minded in your white knighting, is what she talks about serious or open to mockery?

wait you claimed that they didn't give them power now you do, whose moving goal posts here?

receiving criticism and abuse doesn't automatically get you a pass into the UN and Google and be adored by the press, you have to push a leftist ideology and know how to milk it for that to happen, if you're a conservative woman, fuck you. doesn't matter how much abuse you pretend "makes...

This is a pervasive ideology that's factory produced and is everywhere, and those ideological warriors wormed their way into tech firms usualy through some SJW shit or HR, then they use that to socially engineer the companies, I did none of that tanoomba, you're just too retarded to notice...

Nobody forced gillibrand to host fake rape mattress girl either, she chose to do that.

I made the SJW cabals that infected google? Or are you just retarded projecting like usual?

LOL no I didn't, they chose to do this

It would be ok if that was just some rando's opinion who didn't use their outsized influence to try and social engineer society, at that point, the cumulative effect of being scientifically ignorant, a moral authority, and a social engineer is intolerable.

She claimed toxic masculinity is why boys will commit crimes at a higher rate than girls don't even though everyone who was even mildly trained in biology understands the biological differences between young men and women and the role testosterone plays in the differences between men and women...

Sure it is, and it's not cause I said it, it's cause it's ignorant not to know those things.

Ignorance + bias + moral authority =?

You think tanoomba's gonna watch that? he prefers his ignorance.

Hey was everyone aware that tanoomba thinks having basic scientific knowledge of the subject your talking about is "having an ideology" LOLOLOLLLOLOLOL

science is not an ideology lol, there's you trying to turn an argument against itself again, science is a set of tools that dispels ignorance, which is why anita's arguments are ignorant (and stupid). not "requiring" biological knowledge of hormones while talking exclusively about differences...

without having even basic familiarization of biology or any science, statistics ect, it's by definition an ignorant argument, and that's being generous.

the whole field is fictional nonsense, gender isn't even a thing really, it's just a ill defined concept, you can't point a microscope at someones gender ffs.

How can you know anything about the differences of men and women and not atleast taken level 100 courses in the science that literally tells you the physical differences between them. If you're never trained in that science how don't you know if your conclusions are bullshit if you never check...

" How can you have any substantive discussion about men and women and you never talk about hormones or biology, not once at all?

every word out of her mouth that isn't science, based, since you seem so confident this exists, you have many examples ready to quote right?

Of course not but you'd have to know about biology, saying sarkeesian isn't a biologist is a giant LOL copout, her curriculum should make her familiar with biology, if it doesn't that's a huge failure of the female studies curriculum.

It's funny cause you add nothing here and act dumb, maybe you should not shit up the thread?

You would think a class dedicated to differences between men and women would have biology in the curriculum, if it doesn't how could it be legit in any way shape or form? How can you claim any scientific basis for what you're doing when you ignore science?

Does the program that anita was accredited with use biology as part of teaching her about gender? go answer that question. of course you won't find any quotes about anita talking about biology at all, why would I have a quote about a subject she doesn't talk about?

I did that a year ago when she did her dumb series, this is a meta arguement that you're too stupid to recognize.

No actually, you go find me where biology is part of the curriculum of the gender program she attended.

This is how dumb you are, I stated feminism has become anti science and we're discussing the origins of that, if you're too retarded to see this is all part of the same conversation there's no helping you, were you dropped on your head as a baby?

This is a very broad and complex discussion, if you're gonna act like a retard here kindly please fuck off.