Search results

Very vague question. In-geom is useful for my speedfarming charge-hammer barb, but it's useless for my grift WoTW barb.

Coincidentally, I just finished phone interviewing someone who would basically be my peer. But they(my higher ups) let me see how much salary he was requesting. This was probably a big mistake because now all I want to do is disqualify him even though he seemed competent and a good fit.

What do you like to do in your free time? Do you like working alone or in teams? How do you approach a problem? That's what I think when I read "behavioral interview". I've never heard it called that, usually that get lumped into technical questions and it's just called "an interview"...

Stop it.

Can't poop blood if you can't poop.

Did you have a ton of rare bows saved or were you crafting those as well?

I usually go 1.5:1 inf:art so that reserve regiments of infantry replace casualties during the battle and keep the artillery always protected. Combat width, terrain type, and supply limit almost never line up in this game, it's infuriating. Exercising your full combat width at any time is...

Same. My wishlist has been growing with very little coming off it recently. I know Steam has to get the publisher's permission for a sale price, but it seems a lot of games aren't budging on lowering the price years after release. I'm looking at you, Kerbal.

Was it a mirror match?

Sorry, I was thinking of a different scenario. I guess I was just thinking working as a contractor is not all roses. Especially if they know what they were paying you beforehand.

That's very typical at bigger corporations. Fire employee -> hire as contractor for less or reduced liability(or both) -> fire contractor. Sometimes I wish for a programming union, or something.

You're probably thinking of the other yellow mat. DB's, idk, rare->legendary wasn't turning up ancient weapons as much as I wanted, so that seems like a waste.

Definitely agree in theory, maybe harder in practice. Let's take my scenario. I'm getting 4-5% raises per year, 7% bonuses, 10 minute commute, never work more than 40 hours a week. I like pretty much all aspects of my job except that maybe some days/weeks I go home thinking I didn't really...

Easier, MUCH easier, said than done, Celestien. There's likely a heavy dose of confirmation bias going on too. I almost feel like posting the Romney 'buy money' meme. Why don't you fuckers just get taken advantage of less?

Depends on the class and build, honestly. For WoTW, you can now do a ORoTZ build without sacrificing a ring slot. The other two cube slots are basically stat buffs. However, for the same class, cubing enabled a hammer charge build by using 5 pieces of IK and 3 pieces of Raekors and cubing...

I tell myself the same thing, then the house needs repairs, or you could pay a loan off early, or put more money away for retirement or the kid's college fund. I'm happy and relatively comfortable/safe with the amount of money I make now, but I could easily double it and find non-frivolous...

Shields and offhands count as weapons for cubing. Standard build for WoTW6 is going to be Unity/CoTE/ORoTZ.

Skullgrasp is additive, it should never be used. High proc chance, even higher ICD. At least 20s, and I want to say maybe even 30s. There aren't a whole lot of strong amulets, rings are going to be the cubing choice.

You should test on both platforms. Unless I misunderstood and the server farm is just hosting VMs. Gotta job hop to consistently get above that. 5% yty at the same job as pretty good.

Hammer barbs might be competitive, someone did a GR69 on the PTR after IK6 was buffed to 250%. WoTW6 + BK2 will likely(and I think did) clear higher since it has a shit-ton more healing. I do like hammer/raekors for speedfarming though.

That's not criteria I would use for "OP". Grift clear level or T10 rift chain clear speed is probably the only objective measures of OP that remain. If "this is easy" is your only criteria, pretty much any class will meet that, even up to T10. I guess you could use group play, but that's...

Still? When were they ever?

Is it not enough to hate uplay on intent alone? Steam was serving Ubisoft games just fine and uplay offers nothing over it. It's an obvious cash grab and divides the market(where having all your gaming content on one service is a big bonus). Yes, battle.net fits that description too...

For reasons other than staying rich, yes.

Time-saving solutions is, though.

Cad's already recording minutes to bill him.

Because they're tough to find or you don't have any other use for them?

Why would current hunter decks play (just)Dreadscale?

Pointless and arbitrary is still just that, even if it is within the realm of only somewhat inconvenient. How's the engine? That was only other thing that prevented me from getting into PoE. I've heard they have fixed the netcode and rubber banding, but the fluidity of the gameplay itself...

Game would be pretty boring if the PTR drop rate went live. Also, this is the wrong game to play if you want to be "unique". Play a WW barb if you find it fun. PoE doesn't allow skill rerolls, right? Major step backwards for the genre imo.

And if you didn't do that? Note, I'm not endorsing avoiding your personal activities to prevent a spousal rampage.

What spices usually have salt in them? Something like a spice blend? Those are pretty easy to assemble yourself.

That's simple: he spent time with this stuff instead of me. I'm sure you've mentioned your wife complaining about your video game habit in this very thread.

Are you still going to mow her grass?

It's not a niche, it's a substantial market. There's quite a few people that want to play games, but they don't have the time to commit to a long play session. I keep coming back to Hearthstone because it's a great, quick game, despite my desire to play this game not exactly being in line with...

Why did they sell off that product? And what makes you think they won't do the same with the other one as a roundabout way for management to 'cash out'?

Well, if you consider arena a format, then we agree. Though, probably not on implementation. I think limited formats will just lead to stale metas again. Card disparity is not the only reason I dislike constructed. Actually, now is a *great* time to play constructed as a newb because many of...

This game needs arena, constructed's scope is far too narrow. It's a shame how poorly they've treated arena.

That's like sloppy 53rds.