Search results

I declined to participate because: A. I'm not trained in this. B. The experiment you suggested was uncontrolled and easy for you to lie about. C. The idea of dismissing this based on one experiment is dumb, and you know that.

Easy claims (lazy skepticism) to dismiss. Claim: If this was real they would not have shut down the programs (Project Star Gate). Claim: They (CIA) are not hiding anything. They are just embarrassed that they spend millions for frauds and cannot get over it. Counter-Claim: They (CIA) claimed...

I'm glad to have you. Let me know if you find an error in my logic or reasoning and make sure to throw in personal attacks. Stay classy.

Claim: CIA/Military silence on a subject is no indicator either way as to the existence of this. They indiscriminately classify everything that has to do with secret espionage/weapons research by default. Accepted. Military research and security classification prove nothing one way or the...

I'm more than happy to dig into the methods, numbers, results, and criticism. Skeptics are not skeptical enough. More often they're just lazy.

I read the thread, and there are some very strong arguments made in that thread. High quality skepticism. And yet, again, it's proof of what I've been saying that skeptics are not skeptical enough. Most are contrarians who will make an assertion and then fail to follow up on the assertion...

From the article I linked in the Journal of Statistical Science 1991, vol 6, No. 4, page 363-403 Head of CSICOP tells the researches that their experiments are flawed, lists everything he thinks he'd need in an experiment to satisfy him. Then, he conducts the experiments the way he wanted...

And anyone who does is "crazy" when they report what they find.

I'm saying it literally hasn't. The "real scientists" who study this skeptically are quickly convinced that it's real. They are then ostracized, and lumped in with the "nutjobs". Somehow, after a hundred years of empirical observation, no one will touch this.

That is not my opinion, that is the opinion of statistician Jessica Utts. http://www.ics.uci.edu/~jutts/UttsStatPsi.pdf

Further, the skeptics in this thread are claiming Ingo Swann scammed the government and the military officers he trained, SO WELL, that they continued researching PSI under dozens of new top secret projects while publicly denying it for decades.

My opinion doesn't matter. What matters is the evidence showing this effect is real, and it deserves further study, and no scientist will touch this with a ten foot pole, unless it's under a top secret government CIA, KGB, DIA, alphabet agency program.

The skeptics in this thread are claiming that this new age hippie asshole scammed the government out of millions of dollars over 20 years. The skeptics in this thread are claiming that this limp-wristed Bob Ross wannabe convinced dozens of serious army officers that THEY could scam the...

It's disgusting that we, as a society, have left a new and unexplored branch of physics to a bunch of new age hippie retards and religious nuts. This is a real phenomenon it deserves further study.

That's a good point. I'll ask him if/when he shows up again. Unless the shadow government already killed him for leaking the cure to cancer... Scott Adams @ScottAdamsSays

Calling something (fake) doesn't actually make it fake. I've provided a mountain of extraordinary evidence and the best argument the skeptics have presented so far is "No, that can't be right because I don't like it."

Fixed.

Controlled Remote Viewing is a well documented phenomenon.

Why do you need to use revisionist history to justify the ban? You already have the power to edit and remove posts, at least be honest about what happened. I made two posts in Magimaster's thread. First with a suggestion to do a controlled remote viewing (real) to help, then a second post...

This Vox Populi? Vox Popoli Because he likes Molymeme.

Radio? That depends on how much tinfoil you're looking for. I explore everything. On a scale from 1-5. 1 being no tinfoil, 5 being complete tinfoil... 1. If you're looking for the facts and only the facts: Stefan Molymeme. 2. If you're looking for the facts mixed with a dose of the woo woo...

Well, shit. Guess I need to cure cancer now.

I'm wasn't the shadow government. I got wasted last night and lost my keys.

The lock on my front door is broken. A pair of muddy boot prints lead to my bed. I woke up with intense stomach pain. Nothing was stolen.

8 minutes in, claims Scientology influence controlled remote viewing. Was Tom Cruise right after all?

Do something useful, learn how to tap into your latent PSI powers.

Man, I'm suddenly exhausted. Using my PSI powers to determine pedo from normie is one thing, doing it for a guy who's been dead for 200+ years is another. I'm out.

Fish eyes.

Fish Sticks

Fish Eyes.

This is an old lady who is too lazy to clean with a stoner son who made a pentagram in his basement. Not kiddie fuckers.

Bullshit. This is complete bullshit. I can't believe they wasted millions of dollars pursuing this case. I could have debunked it in 10 minutes.

I'm just posting preliminary results. I haven't come to a conclusion yet. This is my gut reaction, and my gut is almost always right. Best gut in the business.

Dead eyes. vs. I can't believe this shit, are these people serious?

Here's a woman who's hurt children. You can tell by the eyes. Dead as fuck.