Search results

The anti-science bias on this board is strong.

Hah, look at this fucking dumbass being convinced by reason and evidence. DOESN'T HE KNOW JAMES RANDI ALREADY DEBUNKED THIS 30 YEARS AGO AND NO ONE HAS DONE ANY RESEARCH SINCE.

BAN THE HERETIC

I'm not trained in this, which means I'd have a 20% success rate. A real test would be, you know, a mass controlled remote viewing to help find someone's missing brother. Even if most of the people on the board are untrained, if enough people got together we could compare notes and nail the...

"What does Himeo have against proper tire PSI?" This isn't really about PSI, because if people actually looked at the evidence it's overwhelming that the effect exists. As with everything, this is really about the implication. What does PSI imply? Aliens exist and have made contact...

"It is fringe woo science of the type that Deepak Chopra regularly throws around. Convincing only to people that see the word "quantum" and turn off their critical faculties." I missed this earlier. So that's it. You don't want to investigate this because you don't want Deepak Chopra to be...

Again, argument to popularity fallacy. Come at the subject without bias and the evidence speaks for itself. Sorry this challenges your materialistic world view. I'm happy to debunk that for you as well.

"They failed to convince people, is why I don't take them seriously." If dolphin fucker is any indication, most scientists dismiss PSI without investigation because of the stigma. Why such stigma? That's the real question. If the last year has demonstrated anything, it's the fact that the...

Since Khalid apparently only reads information he can get from Amazon books, here's one for you. https://www.amazon.com/Evidence-Psi-Thirteen-Empirical-Research-ebook/dp/B00R3D6YWU/ref=mt_kindle?_encoding=UTF8&me=

"Those articles failed to convince the mainstream scientific community." You know, this is why you rely on data and not logical fallacies like Argumentum ad populum - Wikipedia Being such a logical person, I'm surprised you'd make an obvious mistake like that.

Khalid, the resident atheist, refuses to accept the results of decades of scientific research because it makes him feel bad.

Pro-tip: The list of Peer-Reviewed articles I posted have Randi-fag papers making your same tired argument, which are then countered by further papers adjusting the results and still showing the effect exists.

Are you going to read any of the journal articles I'm posting, or are you going to continue to stick your head in the sand praying to James Randi to save you froom spoopy science you don't want to accept?

And they needed to dismiss it to continue research under new secret project names.

The documents I've been posting were FOIA requests that were released last week, showing that the CIA had conclusive proof PSI was real and were continuing their reasearch after the 1995 (disclosure). The reason being, the inherited all of the Defense Intelligence Agencies programs in 1992...

A book written in 1982 before most of the research into PSI was conducted or publicly available. And A BBC documentary on the 1995 Star Gate release, where the CIA said "Oh yeah, we've been studying this shit and it doesn't work. LOL. What a load of shit no one should investigate this stuff...

http://deanradin.com/evidence/Schmidt1987.pdf

http://deanradin.com/evidence/Radin2006reexaminingPK.pdf http://deanradin.com/evidence/Radin2006RNG.pdf http://deanradin.com/evidence/Radin2006MarkovRNG.pdf http://deanradin.com/evidence/Radin2008MichelsonInt.pdf

Unable to edit, annoying. The pictures are from LN 190-91 CHINESE JOURNAL OF SOMATIC SCIENCE VOL 1, ISSUE 1 You can read the full document there.

Challenge accepted. 125 Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles http://deanradin.com/evidence/evidence.htm CIA records STARGATE | CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov) https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00789R002600360002-3.pdf UFO SPACEMAN CONVERSED WITHOUT WORDS | CIA FOIA...

And when a mountain of extraordinary evidence is presented, PSI continues to be discounted. I'll repost the shit if needed. I'm not bullshitting you fine gentlemen, the evidence is in.

Gonna need more than eye witness testimony. I do have standards, after all.

There was a research project back in 2014 that took hair, feces, and other "Bigfoot" samples from anyone that had them. DNA results came back negative. No Bigfoot. Bunch of bear, raccoon, deer, etc. samples. Sorry Dolphin fucker, there's just no evidence for Bigfoot other than plaster foot...

The problem with this board, and people in general, is no one keeps an open mind. That's my super power. I love fringe topics, especially taboo subjects, and I can entertain convincing (but wrong) ideas without being brainwashed. The trick is to always follow the evidence no matter where it...

Personally, I'm going with coincidence. I'm sure Khalid is a good boy who would never use his mod powers to silence dissent. It's endlessly amusing how my interaction on this board goes. I jump down rabbit holes, bring back interesting topics, no one believes me. A few years pass. I check out...

Less than 24 hours after criticizing the state of Israel and Mossad, I'm stuck in the RR. Coincidence? OR CONSPIRACY!?

Just stunned by the sad realization that an "award winning hero" scientist is as anti-science as everyone else on this board. Also, the number of zoophiles in your field is probably 10x higher than the average population. Which is why you aren't denying the sex with dolphins shit and it's...

What, two dolphins at the same time? Impressive.

He should study up on my psi videos. He can win an award for pleasuring dolphins telepathically. He'll be a hero in his field!

That's a fancy way of saying you guys fuck dolphins.

So what do the real marine biologists do while you're fucking around wasting research dollars?

Great, so you're getting paid to masturbate to coral. Can't fuck anything up anything serious.

What's your specialty, Kiroy, and how many years of shit work are real scientists going to have to clean up when they discover you're a fraud?

Funny thing about that. Fish aren't real, atoms and molecules aren't real. Materialism has been debunked by physicists. The fish aren't real. The spoon isn't real. Reality is an illusion.

It's amusing to me that a "Marine Biologist" is so anti-science.

125 peer reviewed journal articles. Backed by statistical meta-analysis. 50 years of research and application by the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Central Intelligence Agency, and the KGB. Controlled Remote Viewing is real, has worked in the past, can work now with the help of people on the...

Condolences to @Magimaster and his family for their loss. Check the Amod thread to see why I was banned for trying to help.

The animosity from the normies in this thread is delicious. You come here expecting an easy target and all I give you is taboo subjects backed by evidence and reasoning. Rather than go to the trouble of picking apart the theories, IE discussing ideas, the normies attack me, discussing people...

When I find solid proof I'll let you know. For now, it's just a missing puzzle piece that can't be anything else.

That's what :emoji_nose:they:emoji_nose: want you to think.