It would make me quite salty at any company if hiring was like
Interview 1: Talent Acquisition Screens -> Thumbs up
Interview 2: Hiring manager -> Thumbs up
Interview 3: Final interview(s) with Team Lead/Lead Engineer or whatever -> Thumbs up
HR -> Final decision maker despite having nothing...
Maybe I am not being clear here but Tech HR, in my experience, does absolutely nothing beyond the initial budgetary constraints for hires. They don't interview anyone unless its other HR people who will be on their team. Ever.
That seems really really retarded to let the ultimate hiring decision be on someone who not only didn't interview the person but won't be on the team that candidate is on anyway.
Guess that would be a reason why everyone hates HR.
So this is something that may be unique to the Tech Industry.
HR has almost zero control over screening candidates in Tech. It's done by recruiters/talent acquisition. These people are incentivized monetarily to fill seats and not not to screen out people for stupid shit like school name. Which...
When I got a Masters. I was skeptical of the impact it would have on my career.
But my leadership told me it was a major factor in getting the massive promotion I got last year (given, I also did try and quit). So it definitely paid for itself.
Personally I question how far school name gets you. I've never once heard of anyone (in the tech industry) giving a shit about school name. I am sure it happens but seems its a few and far between kind of thing.