Search results

The way you describe the 'taunt' and are pretending that Corrente's super obvious hip check wasn't super obvious make it pretty clear that you're lying and that you definitely would have thrown that flag.

He's actually the first Steelers fan I've seen defend the penalty, although I'm sure there are more out there.

everyone point and laugh at @Daezuel

This is going to be shit because despite all our nostalgia, X-Men TAS was mostly shit. Super cheap animation that didn't age well and a lot of mediocre adaptations of comic storylines. If they were going to restart any of the X-Men series it should have been Wolverine and the X-Men which was...

It's comforting to know that no matter what I get wrong, I'll never be the dumbest poster in the thread as long as Lenindoritos is here.

Fuck man I've read that shit at least a dozen times tonight, why would the thirteenth suddenly read differently? I think the intention of the law is the way I've been interpreting it, but you seem to be right about the way it's written and that's what matters. This is why juries are so goddamn...

This is the wrongest possible interpretation.

I mean he's a sagacious fellow but I don't recall him ever saying he was a lawyer. @Lithose chime in with your interpretation of WI 948.60

Get off my fucking dick you obsessed freak.

I'd be more interested in what Cad or the other forum lawyer (name on the tip of my tongue but escaping me atm) had to say since they're the only ones I'd consider to likely be more versed in interpretation of law than the forum cop, who thinks I'm probably right. Although I don't think either...

Not a brony, kinda meh on hentai (and 100% not into any brand of snuff), don't own a single katana, and you will definitely hear about my murders on either unsolved mysteries or c-span. do love me some metal though.

Not one person disputed it until Kyle's lawyer got them whacked out on hopium. And like I said, I hope his lawyer talking in retarded circles works because I'd love to see him walk away completely clean.

You seem to be the only one having trouble.

I agree that @Denamian is a bitch, there was no reason to shaw this while you are still in contention.

Yes, two counts of intentionally giving a dangerous weapon to a minor, causing death, which is a Class H felony. Wow, almost like one of the exceptions in 948.60(3) specifically addresses this. Too bad no part of 948.60(3) applies to Kyle.

I mean you're cute and all but you should have been campaigning in higher traffic sections of the forum. You're a dilettante at best.

948.60(2)(a)(a) Any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor. What part of that very simple sentence isn't crystal clear?

You lost the moment your bracket was seeded bro. You stand even less chance of beating Vanessa than I do of beating Lendarios, and that's if you even make it to the Quarterfinals. The contest will be between Vanessa and Xequecal like it always is. Actually gotten kind of boring.

I'm not the one confused/mis-reading. My entire point is that 948.60(3)(c) is entirely irrelevant to Kyle's situation because he was neither armed with a short-barreled weapon, nor was he hunting which is what 29.304 and 29.593 are referring to. 948.60(2)(a) is crystal clear with zero ambiguity...

from 941.28 (2) No person may sell or offer to sell, transport, purchase, possess or go armed with a short-barreled shotgun or short-barreled rifle. "short-barreled" shotguns and rifles are all illegal in Wisconsin and violation of that law takes precedence over 948.60. It's not a carve-out...

The way I read it short barreled rifles and shotguns are illegal in WI for everyone and that law supersedes 948.60

I believe a misdemeanor conviction would limit his MOS options in the military and cut off law enforcement entirely. I would guess that a fire station would be more concerned about the publicity of hiring him than the conviction. Any felony conviction would pretty much ruin his life.

https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/2015/chapter-948/section-948.60/

the elector system is pretty fun, and a Reikland campaign is a lot more complex than you would think.

He's factually guilty of the crime. He was not on his way to a firing range or to go hunting. He'd still be guilty of the crime even if he hadn't shot anyone, what he did with the weapon has no relevance (except to elevating the severity of the felony being faced by the person who loaned him the...

Keep playing until you don't need to ask that question.

Jokes aside he's factually guilty of violating WI 948.60.

The exemptions for a minor are for hunting and target practice.

Heretic.

It's the animation style/art that doesn't hold up today. It looks like complete shit, there's no need to compare it to Batman.

First one was textbook but that was complete bullshit.

lol dumbass Ravens defender trying to hero-ball instead of following good fundamentals.

honestly one of the best plays of the year

Are you suggesting that Romo isn't legendary?

Where did this defense come from?

I guess Brissett is back up and I heard one of the announcers mention they have a third stringer on the practice squad.

Who is their backbackup when Tua goes down?

you fukin nerd

the first miniseries is uploaded to YT with the nudity cut. I dunno if any subscription service has Children but you can buy it on Amazon or torrent it.