Search results

did he respond to that post?

i've had literally 24/7 free time since my cancer treatment started. every once in awhile i would go in there so i could say to myself "i might have cancer, but at least i'm not as retarded as these guys. life isn't so bad."

Too many people in this thread are responding to hodj while I have him on ignore. RRP hodj plz.

in a way i sympathize / can relate to tanoomba. anyone on this board that doesn't follow the Atheism thread is probably pretty confused about why there's a lot of people here that dislike me. a difference might be that i feel a little ashamed for some of the stupid last-wordism arguments i've...

"you can't make all the people happy all the time"

yeah, any time i hear anyone complaining about tanoomba, its because of things in that thread. i almost never pay attention to that thread, because every time i do poke my head in there all i see is stupid bickering and shitposting (and tanoomba didn't seem to be the only culprit). the only...

yeah, noomba really should have just logged off for a few days instead of shitposting up a storm in the 'shaw. i even told him so. its his prerogative if he doesn't log off, tho... but it would have been nice if he had been able to keep it contained to his personal thread. nah don't bother...

to an extent, even Velious destroyed the danger of being an iksar. they started out non-KoS in Thurgadin just like everyone else, and their tanks were able to get the same armor as everyone else.

but they can only quote posts that were already in the shaw, right? and yeah, i'm aware tagging is a separate issue there.

now that the RRP usergroup was fixed, are quote alerts still an issue?

what sorts of things in your opinion would require punishment by banning? i'm okay with permabans for people doing illegal shit on the boards. i don't follow the gamergate thread, but i find it hard to believe that anything Tanoomba did in there was worthy of a permaban over an RRP.

hm, which alerts? @ tagging? there might be a way to turn that off in just the RR.

way ahead of you.

i don't see how keeping them quarantined to the shaw isn't effective. if you're worried about whether or not they change their behavior in a long term sense, well, they don't need to -- if they never change, then keep them permanently on RRP.

it doesn't have to be anything for them, as long as it keeps them quarantined. forum still gets a net gain from RRPing shitposters, even if the shitposter is okay with the RRP.

No, but maybe it should. Unless the doctor starts up the rehabilitation program again.

I saw no mountain, no temper tantrum just a reasonably stated suggestion...

Yeah, I saw no warpath...

A lot of them also ran on the platform of banning Tanoomba, tho, to be fair.

Tanoomba's actions are what triggered this line of events, pretending it isn't about Tanoomba at all doesn't make it true...

I definitely didn't bring anything to this conversation that wasn't directly relevant to this conversation. You are shitting up this thread and bringing off topic shit into it. And now me responding to you is making myself look bad. But fine, I will direct it to the group as a whole, rather...

I wasn't whining. I asked why it matters to you if you have him on ignore. Which is a legitimate question, since for weeks on end during the forum transition you explained over and over how the new ignore function was going to help us have less rules. You still have not answered the question...

That EXP bonus was supposed to go to humans, but they fucked up the coding and never fixed it.

I was trying to talk about the issue at hand. You are the one that abandoned actual discourse and switched to personal insults.

Never said I only post on RR to troll. One time during one of our extended arguments in one thread, I said that I had switched from trying to have a rational discussion to just trolling you. One time. Anyway, this is the ask a mod thread. If you want to write me extended letters about how...

Just because you're telling yourself that you're the voice of the people doesn't make it true. My notifications are blowing up with likes, does that mean that I'm expressing vox populi? No. Neither of us is. We are expressing personal beliefs and that's it.

Well... Picasso did try making a poll...

...you put that there. Circular logic. "Of course I need to be the people's champion, I said I would be!" Look at what it says under my name. Just because it's there doesn't mean it's true.

Who gives a fuck if he has his own whack shack in the Shaw? If you don't want to see him beating his meat, then don't go in there. Fucking simple.

Let them keep him off ignore then. You don't need to take it upon yourself to fight battles for others.

Shawing someone has two purposes -- the main purpose is to remove them from discussions on the rest of the site. "Punishment" is the secondary function, but it doesn't need to be viewed as punishment by the one who got shawed. Once they've been removed, as adults that should be enough for us...

Just humor me and answer the question. If you already have him on ignore, then why does any of this matter to you?

When all you have are insults, are we done here?

What was his solution?

So if you have him on ignore already... Why does any of this matter to you?

^^^ When I was younger I did three weeks in the county jail for being a drunk idiot. One og my cell mates intentionally got himself locked up, because he preferred county jail over the group home he was forced to live in on the outside. No one tried making up new rules just because the guy...

Do you personally have him on ignore?

But then we gave to go back to one of the things hodj and the other rere- proselytizers were touting as one of the best things about xenforo software--that the new ignore function worked so well that we would never HAVE to ban someone...

I would be okay with everyone having their own Shaw thread.