Search results

the entire point of kryptonite is that they made a character that was unhurtable and it made for poor storytelling. except writers don't like to learn from other writers mistakes and LOOOOOOOOOOVE to make their character invincible. "you can't kill me because i figured out your plot 20 minutes...

yeah... i love me some willis as much as the next guy... but it's clear that he was cast as Bruce Willis. i assume the director told him to act more "bruce willis-y"

star wars was original in the sense that it was old ideas and themes repackaged in a new and interesting way. though, more focus goes to the "interesting" part

no. i didn't. if i wanted to, you'd know. why is it that as soon as someone says he's religious, everyone comes out of the woodworks to call him crazy? i didn't say you have to be religious. i didn't say you are wrong if you don't agree with me. i stated an opinion to which i still hold on to. i...

haha +1

this is a movie that polarizes audiences before they even see it. every movie i've seen that had a trailer for this the audience just yawned at. whereas i was like, instant orgasm. with notable exception of seeing the trailer at IMAX 3D. people still said it looked stupid, but it looked pretty...

i'm sure it'll be up again. i've seen it here and there for about 3 weeks

dude. leave it. if you seriously feel the need to have a conversation with me, do it in pm's.

Wait... So I said something in response to the op that was in no way offensive nor malicious... And you tell me I can't come here because what I believe in and then insult me for doing so? I'm seriously sorry that my beliefs have offended you so horrifically that your only recourse is to call me...

seriously though, in the spirit of peace, let's just agree to disagree. i didn't come on here to start a religion flame war.

here's what i quoted in the pm to him... fa?nat?i?cism (f-nt-szm) n. Excessive, irrational zeal. The American Heritage? Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition copyright ?2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2009. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights...

you're missing the point. fanatacism isn't about believing in something that doesn't exist. it's about attacking anyone who doesn't agree with you just on principle. in this context? it's about attacking someone who said they were religious just because he said he was religious and assuming that...

thank you for proving my point better than i ever could.

an existential crisis can be caused by numerous things. while the actual crisis itself revolves around finding meaning in a (perceived) meaningless life, as well as whether or not someone even SHOULD find meaning where there seemingly isn't any. you can have an existential crisis because you are...

ha. that's great

If anyone has an invite available, I'd appreciate it

i think there's definately still room for silent protaganists. it's just a completely different angle on the narrative. if the protaganist is silent, then the viewpoint is that YOU are experiencing the world and the story first person. if the protaganist talks, then you are watching a character...

Marinate some chops in some soy sauce for an hour and you will get the juiciest chops around. Honestly though... Just be patient and don't cook them too quickly too hot and they'll be plenty juicy. People make dry chips because they cook them like beef and you can't do that

Yup. When I go to a nice steak house, they undercook, when I go to a chain they over cook. When I make it myself, I aim for rare/medium rare. I hate raw meat so the center has to be cooked, but it's still gotta be a dark pink without being RED!!!

I wouldn't really advertise that. Plausible deniability and all that.

Yes exactly. I didn't have the time to post that earlier. I was just coming to post it now

My wife has joked around about it... But she's got crazy dry feet so it's always been more of a punishment

I remember reading an article with Viggo Mortenson. He said they asked him to be in the hobbit. His response? "You people know that aragorn wasn't in the hobbit, right? The hobbit happened 60 years before lotr. Aragorn would 20 years old and had absolutely no idea this was even occuring, much...

Same... Logging on right now and would love an invite. Ign is j00t

i tended to enjoy lady in the water... clearly wasn't a great movie but i enjoyed it. i enjoyed signs because i really liked mel gibson's character. 6th sense was clearly a great movie, but unbreakable is the m.night movie that does it for me. 6th sense was a great movie but after the second...

They already HAVE a permanent exp boost if they've paid $200. I've seen some people asking for free characters as well... YOU ALREADY HAVE ALL THE CHARACTERS

I think we are arguing the same point because I clearly stated that this movie wasn't sci fi

i find that to be an arrogant and naive statement. go have a discussion about lotr or a song of ice and fire with someone who grew up reading those books and ask them if they are familiarized with the subject matter or if they simply "turned their brains off" while reading it. in fact, the whole...

You would if you were "The Gangster"

did i just inadvertantly write the exact same point as dumar...? /wrist

right, there was PLENTY of sci-fi in the history of star trek. ds9 had some AMAZING episodes that were very clearly sci-fi... i just think that the only show where the main focus was sci-fi was tng. sure there was plenty of fantasy episodes, but most of them were sci-fi. and maybe my opinion is...

i think the best way to differentiate science fiction and science fantasy is that in science fantasy the technology is the setting. it's the backdrop. it is simply WHERE the story takes place. in science fiction, the technology is integral to the plot. take game of thrones, for example...

while i enjoyed the movie and the nostalgia that went with it, i couldn't help but agree with alot of what you said... "SINCE WHEN CAN SHIPS FIRE WHILE IN WARP!?" and "oh... scotty gets to advance teleporter technology by 400 years because eric bana." and also, my personal favorite... "if khan...

remember though, that the ship itself was rotating and just because the ship is rotating, doesn't mean anything IN the ship would rotate with it if it wasn't nailed down. on top of that, i'm sure there's some psuedo-hollywood science that would prove why the gravity was sometimes pulling towards...

i havn't had much chance to play more than a few hours total since the past reset... what's wrong with the crafting system? i haven't really used it at all this pass as my heroes are only level 5 and under.

in the game as in, npcs. they all have models, though i think bishop is the only one with has anything more than idle animations. the others are basically vendors that stand and wave their arms around when you talk to them. bishop runs in circles for a minute THEN stands still waving his arms...

David Brevik stated on the beta forums that they just simply do not have the much money at all for marketing. it's a tricky balance because they are clearly spending their limited resources on making the game fun and playable... but... well... if no one is playing it then who cares how great it...

Just got back... Lens flare didn't bother me at all EXCEPT in the scene where Marcus and daughter are talking... Its meant to be heart to heart and all I can see is GIANT BLUE LINES ACROSS THE ENTIRE SHOT!! ALL OVER!!

all of them are in the game, but none of them are currently playable characters. David Brevik has said that gambit is one of the most requested characters so it's a forgone conclusion at this point... just an issue of when.

But you can't move and fire at the same time. If you could, it'd still be easier as you could click exactly where you want to go and then attack while you move there. Moving and aiming is going to be a problem no matter what control scheme you use