Search results

LOL, I don't know if I should laugh or cry but I decided to make deck to combat aggro, especially hunters who were giving some problems...10 games and just 1 aggro and no hunters.

The problem with aggro is made worse by a few things: 1st They are cheap deck to make 2nd They are easy to play 3rd They are very fast...games are short win or lose, so you can play tons of games in a short amount of time 4th They are fairly good decks, not the best but good enough. So...

Some of these look interesting, but they all seem slow and unless they somehow introduce a solid counter to aggro decks...it won't matter. I actually wonder if Blizzard consider aggro to be an issue.

Deadpool teases his own trailer...why the fuck not.

Fuck aggro and hunters, 15 games in a row with either face hunter, zoo, or aggro paladin...9 of which were hunters. This is fucking killing the game for me. It's so fucking boring. There's close to no strategy at all...it's just go face and pretty much ignore everything.

As for the expansion, I guess it will all depends on the inspire mechanic. Most card with inspire seem like they'll be too slow...either get them on the board and use hero power next turn, or wait till you can put them on and use the hero power the same turn...either it feels like it will...

What a weird day, all I got was a bunch of series of 5-6 wins in row followed by 5-6 loses over and over...not a single series of either win or loss that were shorter than 5. Was really weird, and frustrating.

I hate the start of a new season. 10 games, 6 face hunter, 3 zoo and 1 handlock.

LOL, that remind me I had a Webspinner once give me a Webspinner which also gave me a Webspinner. Talk about Deja Vu

I played against a shaman last night and had this happen to me... He plays coins and plays Whirling Zap-o-matic...3/2 with windfury on his turn 1. I can't remove it. His turn 2 is 2 Rockbiter Weapon for 18 damage to my face. I conceded.

Anyone having issue with fullscreen youtube video freezing in edge?

Well, I just finished Words of Radiance. Too much Shallan, especially the flashback which I thought were boring as hell, and so predictable. The contemporary part of the story were passable. The rest though was pretty awesome. I really enjoy the setting and I'm looking forward to the next one.

They are not p2w Tuco, they are pledging toward the development of the game right now. It's a totally different thing.

New hero skins.

The thing is, if things do go bad...it will be like 38 Studio, it blow up and no one will really see it coming. It's not like Chris is gonna come out months before and say, hey guys we're running out of money and it looks like we won't be able to finish the game...and employees you might not get...

My investment in this is small, so I guess this affects my anxiety level about the whole thing. I'm looking for 1 thing at time. And right now that's SQ42...until that ships, everything else is pretty much vaporware. In my opinion, if SQ42 is not a moderate to good success...the rest will...

I brawled against a warlock whose last 3 turns were...Malganis, Nefarian, and another Malganis. I conceded at that point.

Thanks to you and others who replied. I'll be skipping it...or do it later if I ever feel like leveling conjurer. I was planning on Swiftcast, that one seemed like a no-brainer.

You gotta wait for his 3rd article going up today I think after it clears "Legal" for that to happen.

I'm leveling a Scholar now, and I was wondering how "useful" getting Stoneskin from Conjurer is? I'm level 35 Scholar right now, very casual player, only group content is duty roulette and I have no intention of raiding beside what's required for story mode. My conjurer level is just 15.

I watched this last night, I thought the movie was amazing.

Well, I just finished reading Derek Smart new article...can I have those 10 minutes back please. Nothing really new, he's just rewriting the same stuff but much longer. This was a huge disappointment, I expected to learn that Chris was on drugs, and exec producer was sleeping with an...

Patron warrior has full board of damaged creatures and he has lethal...decides to show off before killing me and plays Battle Rage...he only had 2 cards left in his deck....and died to fatigue.

This almost made me spill my drink. On a serious note, my guess is that they'll show some footage from the 3 months of motion capture that they just finish shooting.

Damn that's crazy Apple's smartphone profit is 92% of the entire smartphone industry while being only 20% of sales. It seems most of the other manufacturer are operating at a loss or just breaking even. Apple's Share of Smartphone Industry's Profits Soars to 92% - WSJ

I wasn't expecting much from this, but I must say that look pretty good...I mean the quality of the set, costume, effects, etc... No idea if it will be good, but production value seems pretty high.

Damn, I'm out of popcorn.

You know that when they make a movie about his life and the credits roll on, half the cast is gonna listed as : Rape Victim #1, Rape Victim #2, and so on...they won't actually name them.

ROFLMAO, I have lethal on the board for my next turn if I can get rid of the Taunt the rogue has which I can't at the moment in my hand, I am hoping to draw something that will allow me to kill the taunt...the idiot...stealths all of his minions...including the taunt leaving me the way clear...

A mod on the Star Citizen forums pointed out something I found interesting. There's over 20 links to Derek's own game in his post, and that he's just posting something very controversial in the hopes of getting hits and possibly people buying his game...essentially just marketing plot...

I am not sure how I feel about this game. In some ways I find it simply amazing, the concept, the scope, the tech, etc... In an other way, it looks like to be one of the most boring game I've seen.

He hasn't said or asked anything that people on this forum haven't said or asked, or people on the official forums for that matter. Sounds like his first article didn't create the reaction he expected so he decided to go full retard and go on Facebook and unfriend Chris.

As I said before I have no doubt they have money to get SQ42 out the door, the rest hinge on the success of SQ42 and it's expansion. My guess is that the game will only be available from them as digital devilry where they'll get all the revenue. So 3-4 millions sales(above the free version that...

Since when do hunters play taunts, encounter a deck that had 2 deathlords and 2 sludge beltcher, and another with 1 deathlord and 1 sludge beltcher...leading me to believe he probably had 2 of each. New hunter deck maybe? Took me by surprise for sure.

I hate when someone has lethal and they clear your board before killing you...but then miscalculate and are short 1 life for the kill and you kill them the next turn, then I love it.

Some of the boss fights remind me of Wildstar with all the ground telegraph all over the place.

I'm disappointed with the Tavern Brawl so far, it's just too gimmicky. I was hoping for special rules in deck building which would have made things interesting. Also the lack of reward after the first win makes it fairly pointless.

Hopefully they've learned something from working with a Korean developer with ArcheAge and this will go better for them.

Yeah, right now I have serious doubt about co-op for SQ42, but you never know. It's definitely a feature that can be dropped without any big impact on the game.

Squadron 42 will give us a better idea of what their development schedule is like as it requires most if not all of the PU's modules, like most of the ships, a good flight system, probably a lot of the system like repairs, transport, exploration, the FPS, and planetside stuff. It doesn't...