This is dead on. He lucked out on stumbling across a million dollar idea, but he could have hired someone to code it for him for very little money or learned to code himself. AI just reduced the friction a bit.
They already had a path. All they had to do was hire a coder to work for them for a few days. AI makes it cheaper and easier, but the idea was the important part all along.
Yes they are often depending on the older model to police the newer "smarter" one. I'm sure you can see the issue with this.How do you test this feature? AI is difficult enough to test as is, dynamically generating a UI seems too far in that direction.
I have a friend that works in AI research and to test the output of their AI, they use other AIs as baselines.
This will never work. AI will have to be forever neutered and prevented from getting too smart.
I don't think we are capable of controlling the level of AI they want. Either we stick with simple AI, or we hope we get lucky with a benevolent AI Overlord.
Oh, I don’t mean smart like that, I’m talking about socioeconomic intelligence.
