Board members have a legal responsibility to the financial interests of the shareholders. A corporation exists to make money, not good games, good food, happy customers, etc. As long as they are making money with mobile systems, milking whales, etc, then they are doing a 'good job'.
The point of earlier in this thread is that what the consumer thinks of as a 'good job' (good games) and what the shareholders think of as a 'good job' (money) don't always align. Now, there are things called Benefit Corporations which add a new legal requirement to balance their purpose/positive impact alongside profit. This helps, for example, in the case of negative externalities on the environment. I have no idea if you can apply this to something nebulous like making 'good games'. We have already seen from the industry that the best games are not necessarily the biggest financial successes, but they are still successes.
Point being, some people want to make good games and have the money follow. There is room for that. Just be aware if you 'sell your soul' to a corporation or become incorporated, your new job is making money first and games second.
