Car ?'s

ShakyJake

<Donor>
7,627
19,253
Here's a (probably dumb) question for any engineers out there:

Say you wanted to create a performance electric vehicle. Instead of using batteries couldn't you have a gasoline engine be the generator for the electric motor? Or would the gasoline engine + fuel end up weighing more than a battery negating any advantage? I suppose the question is how powerful of a gasoline engine would you need?

Again, this would be a performance oriented automobile and not something trying to be fuel efficient.
 

Frenzied Wombat

Potato del Grande
14,730
31,802
Here's a (probably dumb) question for any engineers out there:

Say you wanted to create a performance electric vehicle. Instead of using batteries couldn't you have a gasoline engine be the generator for the electric motor? Or would the gasoline engine + fuel end up weighing more than a battery negating any advantage? I suppose the question is how powerful of a gasoline engine would you need?

Again, this would be a performance oriented automobile and not something trying to be fuel efficient.

That's already done in hybrid vehicles. The engine charges the battery to extend running time.
 

Cad

<Bronze Donator>
24,487
45,378
Here's a (probably dumb) question for any engineers out there:

Say you wanted to create a performance electric vehicle. Instead of using batteries couldn't you have a gasoline engine be the generator for the electric motor? Or would the gasoline engine + fuel end up weighing more than a battery negating any advantage? I suppose the question is how powerful of a gasoline engine would you need?

Again, this would be a performance oriented automobile and not something trying to be fuel efficient.

Only the i3 does this that I know of, and its shitty. The problem is to have a generator that would make enough power for a performance vehicle, you’d end up with a relatively loud and obnoxious engine... why not just have the engine power the wheels? We are good at building those. You’d also end up with a battery anyway since you’d need some short-term storage for .. “high throttle events”. So you’d end up with both and both drivetrains would end up compromised. See: the i3, volt, etc.

Frenzied Wombat Frenzied Wombat I don’t think any of the current hybrids use the motor to charge the battery besides the i3 REX. If I’m wrong feel free to point out the ones that do.
 

Frenzied Wombat

Potato del Grande
14,730
31,802
Only the i3 does this that I know of, and its shitty. The problem is to have a generator that would make enough power for a performance vehicle, you’d end up with a relatively loud and obnoxious engine... why not just have the engine power the wheels? We are good at building those. You’d also end up with a battery anyway since you’d need some short-term storage for .. “high throttle events”. So you’d end up with both and both drivetrains would end up compromised. See: the i3, volt, etc.

Frenzied Wombat Frenzied Wombat I don’t think any of the current hybrids use the motor to charge the battery besides the i3 REX. If I’m wrong feel free to point out the ones that do.

I’m pretty sure all the combo motor/battery (hybrid) vehicles do this. I mean it makes logical sense, if you are using your motor rather than your battery (say hitting the gas hard on your Prius) it would make sense that some of that energy be used to charge the battery.
 

Cad

<Bronze Donator>
24,487
45,378
I’m pretty sure all the combo motor/battery (hybrid) vehicles do this. I mean it makes logical sense, if you are using your motor rather than your battery (say hitting the gas hard on your Prius) it would make sense that some of that energy be used to charge the battery.

Ya I mean the gas engine is not connected to the wheels at all and just serves as an electrical generator. In the hybrids the electric motor does run in regen mode at low-load and charge the battery somewhat, but the gas engine is driving the wheels. I think what he’s referring to is where the engine ONLY charges the battery and the propulsion is fully electric. Sorry to seem like splitting hairs..
 

Frenzied Wombat

Potato del Grande
14,730
31,802
Ya I mean the gas engine is not connected to the wheels at all and just serves as an electrical generator. In the hybrids the electric motor does run in regen mode at low-load and charge the battery somewhat, but the gas engine is driving the wheels. I think what he’s referring to is where the engine ONLY charges the battery and the propulsion is fully electric. Sorry to seem like splitting hairs..


If that's the case he's presenting, then It would be totally retarded to have a gas engine dedicated to charging the battery. At that point why bother having a battery at all, because you're going to get far better MPG on just direct combustion to the wheels rather than the reduced MPG you're going to get via energy loss when converting from gasoline to electric.

Best analogy of this setup I can think of is adding a whole-home electrical generator to your house that runs on natural gas, you were paying $200/month to TXU, and now you're all proud that your TXU bill is $0 but you have a $250 Atmos bill instead.
 

Cad

<Bronze Donator>
24,487
45,378
If that's the case he's presenting, then It would be totally retarded to have a gas engine dedicated to charging the battery. At that point why bother having a battery at all, because you're going to get far better MPG on just direct combustion to the wheels rather than the reduced MPG you're going to get via energy loss when converting from gasoline to electric.

Best analogy of this setup I can think of is adding a whole-home electrical generator to your house that runs on natural gas, you were paying $200/month to TXU, and now you're all proud that your TXU bill is $0 but you have a $250 Atmos bill instead.

Well there’s a precedent for it though, Diesel locomotives and most ships have the engines not connected to the propellers at all. The electricity generated is used to power electric motors connected to the propellers.

I just don’t think it works in cars because you’d have such small spaces and people wouldn’t put up with the noise/vibration/etc.
 

Frenzied Wombat

Potato del Grande
14,730
31,802
Well there’s a precedent for it though, Diesel locomotives and most ships have the engines not connected to the propellers at all. The electricity generated is used to power electric motors connected to the propellers.

I just don’t think it works in cars because you’d have such small spaces and people wouldn’t put up with the noise/vibration/etc.

I'd be curious as to the reason that is done in boats/trains-- there must be some sort of safety or engineering reason, because you always lose some energy efficiency (typically in the form of heat) when converting from one energy type to another.
 

Cad

<Bronze Donator>
24,487
45,378
I'd be curious as to the reason that is done in boats/trains-- there must be some sort of safety or engineering reason, because you always lose some energy efficiency (typically in the form of heat) when converting from one energy type to another.

I think it's considerably more efficient since they can run the motors at peak RPM without concern for transmission/load/etc. The main failing of the gas engines in cars is that they suck shit efficiency at part load, so your 400hp motor making 40hp to sustain 60mph sucks. The 100hp motor sustaining 40hp is a lot more efficient.

In the ship/train they can just keep the motor running at peak efficiency wide open charging with no usability concerns.

Also for trains specifically having the startup torque to get the train moving, as I understand it, is a HUGE advantage of electrics.
 

ShakyJake

<Donor>
7,627
19,253
If that's the case he's presenting, then It would be totally retarded to have a gas engine dedicated to charging the battery. At that point why bother having a battery at all
Doing a tiny bit of research it seems what I'm suggesting is called a "series hybrid" BUT without the battery. The gasoline engine, basically a generator, powers the electric motor directly. Again, don't care about fuel efficiency or range. Just pure, raw performance that an electric motor can deliver.

I brought this up because I watched the Netflix series "The Fastest Car". One of the vehicles was a home brew electric which was stuffed with batteries. So my thought was ditch the batteries and just use a gas engine to power the motor instead. I mean, I would assume that a gasoline generator could pump out more voltage than batteries..?
 

BrutulTM

Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun.
<Silver Donator>
14,433
2,219
I'm guessing it's an advantage in ships just for distribution. Those things are huge and I'd think it would be a benefit to just have your power plant at one point in the ship and then just run electrical cables to everywhere you need power. Obviously you need electricity for many things in the ship besides powering the motors so you're going to have a generator anyway. Makes sense to just have one huge generator that provides power to everything on the ship rather than having multiple smaller internal combustion engines scattered around for various purposes.

The diesel engines in some of those ships are incredible.

18nb9qaluwviojpg.jpg


 
Last edited:

BrutulTM

Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun.
<Silver Donator>
14,433
2,219
I mean, I would assume that a gasoline generator could pump out more voltage than batteries..?

Not necessarily. I mean obviously a big enough generator could, but it would weigh a lot. For a short period of time you might get more current per pound out of dumping a bunch of charged batteries.
 

Siliconemelons

Avatar of War Slayer
10,795
15,149
Only the i3 does this that I know of, and its shitty. The problem is to have a generator that would make enough power for a performance vehicle, you’d end up with a relatively loud and obnoxious engine... why not just have the engine power the wheels? We are good at building those. You’d also end up with a battery anyway since you’d need some short-term storage for .. “high throttle events”. So you’d end up with both and both drivetrains would end up compromised. See: the i3, volt, etc.

Frenzied Wombat Frenzied Wombat I don’t think any of the current hybrids use the motor to charge the battery besides the i3 REX. If I’m wrong feel free to point out the ones that do.


A normal "Hybrid" i.e. Prius = Small Battery + Small Electric Motor + Gas Motor. The Electric offsets and works "with" the gas - regenerative breaking and the gas motor charge the battery during breaking (reversing the electric motor spin is all regenerative breaking is.) and during stops or idle the gas charges the battery. - Both motors together can propel the car - the electronic alone cannot, yet the gas can.

Plug-In-Hybrid = Medium Size Battery + Mid Size Electronic Motor + Gas Motor. The electric motor can fully propel the car alone OR in conjunction with the gas motor. You must plug in to charge the battery.

Pure EV = Large Battery and Large Electric Motor. The Electronic Motor does all the work as does the battery and you must plug in to charge.

EV + "Range extender" - i.e. the BMW i3 = A normal and complete Pure EV with, what is essentially a gas generator that turns on to suppliment power drain / charge the battery - the gas motor has no direct locomotion capability- so if you run out of battery, the gas generator cannot propel your car... I have had a few people that have this, and the range extender is always causing issues and in the shop... I also do not know if you do run out of battery if you have gas/fill up the RE if it then can charge your battery and get you going again.
 

Lanx

<Prior Amod>
60,672
132,822
Everytime i made a "hard" turn i'd kick on the ABS light in the impreza, some searching pointed me to worn/wobbly rotor might be the issue. the current rotors "look" fine 30k on em, but whatever didn't seem that hard to change, ended up brake cleaning the brakes while at it.

wow it was wobbly rotors, and the car drives "quieter" too. (took it to chicago and back 1k miles)

so is there a reason to keep these heavy rotors around?
 

Lanx

<Prior Amod>
60,672
132,822
having got an amazon echo auto, wife will probably play music more, so i'll be upgrading the speakers, looks easy enough. I should really upgrade the horrible head unit first, but before i do that i'd want to do it to my civic for the purposes of it being the car i can test shit on, and i still have the factory headunit... cassette player!
 

BrutulTM

Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun.
<Silver Donator>
14,433
2,219
I have replaced quite a few head units recently and I find the kits from Crutchfield to be worth the money.
 

Denamian

Night Janitor
<Nazi Janitors>
7,184
18,962
Bought a head unit from Crutchfield a few years ago and the wiring harness and dash kit were either free or heavily discounted.
 

Burren

Ahn'Qiraj Raider
4,047
5,334
I think it's considerably more efficient since they can run the motors at peak RPM without concern for transmission/load/etc. The main failing of the gas engines in cars is that they suck shit efficiency at part load, so your 400hp motor making 40hp to sustain 60mph sucks. The 100hp motor sustaining 40hp is a lot more efficient.

In the ship/train they can just keep the motor running at peak efficiency wide open charging with no usability concerns.

Also for trains specifically having the startup torque to get the train moving, as I understand it, is a HUGE advantage of electrics.

Wrong, actually. Petrol is much more efficient at cruise that electric. Electric is superiour in stop-and-go.
 

Cad

<Bronze Donator>
24,487
45,378
Wrong, actually. Petrol is much more efficient at cruise that electric. Electric is superiour in stop-and-go.

My 120mpge 675hp electric car disagrees with you, sir. I'll continue paying 2 cents per mile while you wonder if electric cars are more efficient.
 
  • 1Barf
Reactions: 1 user

Burren

Ahn'Qiraj Raider
4,047
5,334
My 120mpge 675hp electric car disagrees with you, sir. I'll continue paying 2 cents per mile while you wonder if electric cars are more efficient.

I'm not a scientist. Just quoting dozens and dozens who are.