Jysin
Bronze Baronet of the Realm
- 6,852
- 5,035
Joeboo's advice in his last few posts has been exactly spot on. I have been building rigs for myself and friends for ~15 years now and agree 100% with what he has said. Build a system now and enjoy it for a couple of years. Upgrade the video card at that point and continue on. The CPU market hasnt really made any significant pushes aside from lowered power use in the last few years. Make sure your new motherboard has USB 3.0 and to a lesser extent PCIe 3.0 and you should be golden.
Overall, technology has been FAR ahead of the software (games) for quite some time. You don't exactly have a lot to worry about.
Also, like he said, the next-gen consoles are already years behind in PC tech.
Overall, technology has been FAR ahead of the software (games) for quite some time. You don't exactly have a lot to worry about.
Also, like he said, the next-gen consoles are already years behind in PC tech.
http://www.pcworld.com/article/20291...-compete-.htmlFirst, there's the matter of the CPU cores. Without getting into technicalities, AMD's Jaguar architecture is the impending successor to the "Bobcat" architecture found in the company's current low-power APUs, and it is not especially beefy. While the idea of an octa-core console sounds dreamy on the surface, the illusion is shattered when you realize that on the PC side of things, Jaguar APUs will be modest processors targeted at tablets, high-end netbooks (ha!), and entry-level laptops.
In other words, the PlayStation 4's CPU performance isn't likely to rock your socks compared to a PC sporting an AMD Piledriver- or Bulldozer-based processor. It might not even trump a lowly Intel Core i3 processor, especially if Eurogamer's early PlayStation 4 leaks continue to prove accurate and those eight cores are clocked at 1.6GHz.
Then there's the GPU. The specs don't line up with any of AMD's Radeon HD 7000-series graphics cards, and we can't be sure just how custom the semi-custom GPU actually is. Nonetheless, 1.84 teraflops of performance puts the GPU just ahead of the Radeon HD 7850 and well under the Radeon 7870. That also holds true if you assume the PlayStation 4 GPU's 18 compute units sport a build similar to the GCN architecture used to build AMD's Radeon HD 7000-series graphics cards.
The Radeon HD 7850 is nothing to sneeze at. Indeed, if you're looking for a midrange video card, it's a stellar option. But it's still just a midrange card, not a graphical trail blazer-and yet it will form the backbone of the PlayStation 4's gaming chops for years to come.
Overall, if you compare its hardware to what's available in today's PC landscape, the PlayStation 4 is basically powered by a low-end CPU and a midrange GPU. It even packs a mechanical hard drive in an age when many PC gamers have moved on to lightning-quick solid-state drives.