Funny, Strange, Random Pics

Wantonsoup95

Wantonsoup95

Ahn'Qiraj Raider
1,244
5,006
FB_IMG_1483745545961.jpg
 
  • 2Like
  • 1Jew
  • 1Worf
Reactions: 4 users
Caepan

Asshat Caepan

Asshat of the Year 2020
6,949
6,771
'....and Mexico will pay us back for the wall later.'

yea right.

dt.jpg
 
  • 3Faggotry
  • 3Like
  • 2Worf
Reactions: 13 users
apraetor

apraetor

<Silver Donator>
902
1,001
langford said:
View attachment 110618
Click to expand...
b30.jpg

They aren't linked. The thesis that neonazi violence would increase post-election is not disproved by the fact pro-civil rights violence (in far smaller amounts, according to SPLC and FBI reporting) also occurs.

EDIT: I'm not sure how a statement pointing out a logical fallacy can be nationalist, since it's not arguing a position but rather pointing out a logical inconsistency.. in a pro-neonazi argument, no less. But since when do facts matter? ;)
 
Last edited:
  • 5Picard
  • 4Nationalist
  • 2Faggotry
Reactions: 16 users
N

Navinod

Trakanon Raider
59
110
apraetor said:
View attachment 110778
They aren't linked. The thesis that neonazi violence would increase post-election is not disproved by the fact pro-civil rights violence (in far smaller amounts, according to SPLC and FBI reporting) also occurs.
Click to expand...
what.jpg


Pro-civil rights violence? Those were thugs who decided they wanted to kidnap, assault and torture someone of a different race. That's an aggravated hate crime, not "pro-civil rights violence". Dont crouch what happened in comfortable terms to make it seem less than it was. And how exactly are you saying there is less violence than if Trump had lost? Where are the stats you are pulling from where Trump lost the election? You are right in the basic premise that one does not disprove the other, but your supporting language and "facts" are confusing, if not completely false.
 
  • 3Solidarity
  • 2Like
  • 1Jew
Reactions: 7 users
You must log in or register to reply here.