>> Dude's a dude. An athletic, muscular dude.
Actually, she isn't. She's got two X chromosomes. She looks like a dude because of hyperandrogenism; she's got a lot more testosterone than typical women. In order for hyperandrogenism to have detectable effects it requires a genetically-female body in which the testosterone can suppress female sex characteristics.
>> Even married a woman. Like dude's do.
Lesbians do that, too.
>> But 'identifies' as a broad when he competes in sports.
She's always identified as a woman, both on and off the field.
>> So he wears woman's oufits on the field and competes as a woman in women's events, and subsequently wins all the races.
Men and women in track races wear similar outfits. Calling her a "he" doesn't change the fact she's a she.
>> Then re-dresses as a man after the race and goes home to his wife.
>> The IAAF has no problem with this.
>> Generation wuss embraces the diversity.
What's the matter, snowflake? Afraid a woman has more testosterone than you? She has a genetic mutation which gives her a competitive advantage; we don't punish men who have high levels of natural testosterone, and we don't punish people of either gender for having high natural HGH levels, or high hemoglobin, etc. If the point is to find someone who is the best, then you can't complain when someone has a genetic advantage over other competitors. Instead of wussing out the sports to your level, how about we just skip to giving you the participation trophy now?
