Investing General Discussion

Sanrith Descartes

Its all the Joos' fault. Am I doing this right?
<Gold Donor>
48,599
130,691
Yeah, Roth will be max’d each year from here on out. Next goal is to try and max 401k. My rollover is pretty substantial, I had a bunch of mag7 that did well for me but I can’t really contribute more to my rollover which is why I added the income funds to maybe try and increase my positions within the rollover. Additionally, my rsus are going to a taxable account after maxing Roth to drum up some additional income through some SPYI/ULTY/BTCI. My rsus are basically dead money and I don’t want to be entirely concentrated in my company. So the income will help me add to my 401k even if I have some NAV erosion. It’s not a huge position and it’s a bit robbing Peter to pay Paul but I think it can work and I’ll keep making RSUs every year so I have a steady vesting schedule from here on out to sell and pump my taxable brokerage.
Why max Roth before the 401k? 401k directly lowers your taxable income. The usual plan is to max that first.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Synj

Dystopian Dreamer
<Gold Donor>
8,509
37,855
Why max Roth before the 401k? 401k directly lowers your taxable income. The usual plan is to max that first.
Because I have some catch up to do on the Roth and most of that funding is coming from the sale of my RSUs which can’t be directly put into my 401k. I suppose I could up my deduction from my paycheck and then live off some RSU cash. I’m just a little tighter on cash flow than I would like and some of it is just circumstance. I bought a house in 2023 at 5.675 and although I make good money, my percent of income for my house is probably 40% which is tough on a single income.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Furry

Email Loading Please Wait
<Gold Donor>
25,575
36,064
Why max Roth before the 401k? 401k directly lowers your taxable income. The usual plan is to max that first.
I can’t sit down and do the math right now, but when I did at 30 maxing 401k first did not make sense. I’d have to do it again, but my paper math mind is telling me it’s probably better to max Roth first at his age unless he made over 191k, and at that point you can’t do a Roth. The gains in 9 years are almost certain to exceed the 12% cut he’d save from the gov when retiring. State taxes could, but probably won’t change that.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Furry

Email Loading Please Wait
<Gold Donor>
25,575
36,064
There's some really good analysis on Roth v. Traditional in the personalfinance wiki on Reddit.

That take aligns to the math I’ve done in the past.I think the biggest point they didn’t cover that was relevant to my thinking was that a Roth allows you to be very flexible with how much disburse which would otherwise blast you into the 32% bracket, especially since I was going to SEPP my 401k and could likely encounter the need for something like that in the 50-60 age range.

But it really just tells the importance of doing the math on your personal situation and retirement expectations. I still think my generalization for priority is true for most people and situations, it’s definitely not true for all situations.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Sanrith Descartes

Its all the Joos' fault. Am I doing this right?
<Gold Donor>
48,599
130,691
I can’t sit down and do the math right now, but when I did at 30 maxing 401k first did not make sense. I’d have to do it again, but my paper math mind is telling me it’s probably better to max Roth first at his age unless he made over 191k, and at that point you can’t do a Roth. The gains in 9 years are almost certain to exceed the 12% cut he’d save from the gov when retiring. State taxes could, but probably won’t change that.
As Cad alluded to, there is a general thinking on it but it can always change for individual circumstances.
 

Gravel

Mr. Poopybutthole
44,332
157,226
Stupid fucking market keeps climbing! This having my money transferring thing really sucks balls. I'm not sure if it was sold Wednesday or Thursday, but I'm probably out at least 1% so far. Still probably 7-10 days too (they said they were issuing the check today).
 
  • 1Solidarity
Reactions: 1 user

Jysin

Bronze Baronet of the Realm
7,020
5,367
It is a few mega caps carrying everything today. Quite the mixed market and Bitcoin has been the leading indicator to markets and it is down over 2% and given up the 100D MA once again. This doesnt look like healthy market action today. Of course this is just a daily snapshot, but nothing about today screams broader strength.

1758560732835.png
 
  • 1Like
  • 1Truth!
Reactions: 1 users

Jysin

Bronze Baronet of the Realm
7,020
5,367
In today's AI circle-jerk news:

NVIDIA announces $100B of its own money to give to another company, so that other company can buy NVIDIA stuff.
Market adds $200B market cap to NVIDIA on the headline.
Can't make this stuff up.

1758562037911.png
 
  • 1Repost
  • 1Tendies
  • 1Mother of God
Reactions: 3 users

Sanrith Descartes

Its all the Joos' fault. Am I doing this right?
<Gold Donor>
48,599
130,691
Porsche drops 8% (biggest on record) as it gets booted from the DAX. Apparently that whole building EV thing isnt as easy as people thought.




 

Gravel

Mr. Poopybutthole
44,332
157,226
People into performance cars don't want soulless EVs that weigh a fuckload? Odd.
I feel like many, many years ago when Top Gear was still on the air, the first EV supercars came out and they kind of loved them (despite hating EV's), because it's immediate torque.
 

Kirun

Buzzfeed Editor
20,655
17,386
I feel like many, many years ago when Top Gear was still on the air, the first EV supercars came out and they kind of loved them (despite hating EV's), because it's immediate torque.
Sure, but the higher curb weight, no engine noise, no gears, etc. just feels so off-putting when you're into "performance" cars.

The 0-60 is no doubt impressive (due to the immediately available torque, like you said). But the rest of it is so bland.
 

Haus

I am Big Balls!
<Gold Donor>
17,087
69,427
Ive been in uranium stocks since 2014.

There are some nuclear and uranium plays that are doing very well, many of these I am well up 10x, electricity will be the bottleneck to AI, China is leaps ahead with how much electricity they have available and are adding, the power grid in the USA is going to be under major strain going forward large part due to AI and Crypto. Big tech is moving in with capital to secure nuclear power generation, trump signed 3 exec orders to speed up its development.

CCJ, UEC, DNN, UUUU - my top uranium plays

OKLO, SMR, BWXT - reactor developers

LEU, LBTR, ASPI - fuel services/enrichment

Made this post about it in 2017.



View attachment 598264
Might I also add, that if you want a broad play, URNM has treated me pretty well...
1758578970563.png


Before the AI boom I held that the real technology that will provide sustained power moving forward will be nuclear before wind/solar.
 

Furry

Email Loading Please Wait
<Gold Donor>
25,575
36,064
Markets seem to have shrugged their shoulders at H1B change. Little surprise to me when virtually all of these people were unqualified slave labor.
 

Strifen

Molten Core Raider
312
1,590
Might I also add, that if you want a broad play, URNM has treated me pretty well...
View attachment 603026

Before the AI boom I held that the real technology that will provide sustained power moving forward will be nuclear before wind/solar.

URNM, URA, or NLR are all doing great this year.

URNM is pure play Uranium miners, URA holds uranium miners as well as OKLO/SMR, NLR has all of the above as well us utilities, CEG, PEG etc.

OKLO was $8 a share 1 year ago now trading at $140.