Investing General Discussion

Sanrith Descartes said:

Im old enough to remember when I was told BTC and crypto were decentralized and totally detached from fiat currency and stock markets.

Click to expand...

USD price for BTC is obviously connected to USD. That doesn't fundamentally effect how Bitcoin works though, just exchange rate

Sanrith Descartes said:

Im old enough to remember when I was told BTC and crypto were decentralized and totally detached from fiat currency and stock markets.

Click to expand...

Ive never seen anyone outside Twitter crypto bot accounts say anything that stupid.

Sanrith Descartes said:

Saylor announced another MSTR $15b in stock dilution to buy more BTC. The math just doesn't work on this model unless BTC price never goes down. Investors lose value on every dilution. It's basically the best investment ever as long as BTC only goes up. If it goes sideways (or God forbid down) investors take it in the ass. I keep thinking about writing some puts but then I keep looking at his investment "model" and think... no fucking way.

Click to expand...

I have absolutely bought and sold PUTs against MSTR many times. I didn't do it during this recently downward trend and I really should have considering hindsight You are correct that he seems to be biting off a bit more than he can chew with all of these preferred shares, dilutions, etc. There is a bit of resistance around this level but then a massive gap to the 140$ range from almost 2 years ago if it keeps falling through. I was waiting for a buy signal but I have obviously but missing the bigger fall here so reconsidering a PUT play.

Sanrith Descartes said:

Well, then I guess you ain't old enough.

Grok, was some of the big pros of BTC was the it was decentralized and detached from fiat currency and the stock market?

"Yes — that was exactly one of the core selling points of Bitcoin during its early mainstream momentum (roughly 2013–2021), and it was widely and loudly proclaimed by advocates, including:

• Satoshi Nakamoto (in the whitepaper and forum posts)
• Early cypherpunks (Hal Finney, Nick Szabo)
• Libertarian and Austrian economics influencers
• Michael Saylor (pre-2020, before he went all-in with MSTR)
• Maximalists on forums like BitcoinTalk, Reddit, and early Twitter"

Click to expand...

Think youre missing the point.

It *is* decentralized.

As far as being detached from fiat currency and the stockmarket, the selling point for BTC is that it seeks to be so. I don't think Satoshi ever suggested it had achieved that goal.

Like I said, im sure you could come up with some random crack pots that argued something like that, but no one serious.

Redo your search and ask if Satoshi or Saylor has ever claimed that it actually had detached from the broader market, or if that was just something it had the potential to do.


Edit- Here's a better search using your precise terminology:

Arden said:

Think youre missing the point.

It *is* decentralized.

As far as being detached from fiat currency and the stockmarket, the selling point for BTC is that it seeks to be so. I don't think Satoshi ever suggested it had achieved that goal.

Like I said, im sure you could come up with some random crack pots that argued something like that, but no one serious.

Redo your search and ask if Satoshi or Saylor has ever claimed that it actually had detached from the broader market, or if that was just something it had the potential to do.


Edit- Here's a better search using your precise terminology:

View attachment 608088

Click to expand...

I feel like this has come up so many times over the last decade.

If it's not detached from the US economy, what's the point? I still contend that the only people still touting Bitcoin are doing it because they see it as an investment, and convincing more people about how amazing it is means their investment goes up. There's a built in hypocrisy, because if it's a stable currency and not an investment, they're just holding it as a store of value, but I doubt many of them would see that as a good outcome.

Gravel said:

I feel like this has come up so many times over the last decade.

If it's not detached from the US economy, what's the point? I still contend that the only people still touting Bitcoin are doing it because they see it as an investment, and convincing more people about how amazing it is means their investment goes up. There's a built in hypocrisy, because if it's a stable currency and not an investment, they're just holding it as a store of value, but I doubt many of them would see that as a good outcome.

Click to expand...

This is a fundamental misunderstanding of what "stable" is. If you're dividing the value of something by United States Dollars then its obviously going to be affected by that denominator. We live in a world where everything is priced in USD, coincidentally is going up in value against that denominator. If you measure the world with Bitcoin as the denominator it is getting cheaper.

You CAN'T separate the value of something from the dollar if you measuring it by its value in dollars. That should be obvious.

Bitcoin is detached from the dollar and traditional market in the sense that it will continue to function with or without them and individuals, in a vacuum, who traded goods and services for only BTC could continue to do so. Now obviously thats not real life and the economy at large WILL affect everything around Bitcoin, but the actual fundamental functioning of Bitcoin is not affected.

If all you can think of is USD price you're never going to understand this. No shame in that, you're just trying to measure the system from inside the system. That won't work. Bitcoin is so far outside of the overton window for most people its just not going to stick for most.

People will adopt it the same way they do any other new technology, once it goes from "I don't understand this, so I won't use it" to "Well, I don't understand it but xyz (person, company, w/e) understands it and says its valuable, so I'll trust them". For better or worse they're going to digitize the entire economy including the money, whether you understand it or not.

TLDR - its not Bitcoin thats unstable, its the Dollar. Don't believe me? Look at the valuations of literally everything

Big Phoenix said:

How do you make something as useful as gold without any of the usefulness of gold?

Click to expand...

Gold isn't valuable because it can be used for things. The monetary use of Gold is collateral.

Because bitcoin is decentralized, it is largely beyond the reach of government manipulation.

Because there is a hard-coded finite supply of bitcoin, it can't be inflated.

Because bitcoin exists in the electronic medium, it is much easier to move and store than gold.

Because of all those things, bitcoin is a superior store of value.

THAT (scarcity, portability, censorship resistance) is the point of bitcoin.

That's the theory anyway, and I personally have come to believe it to be true.