Investment/Rental Properties - Megathread

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!

Cad

scientia potentia est
<Bronze Donator>
25,634
49,916
So lets say you buy a $150k house with 20% down in an average neighborhood. What are your costs going to be? PITI + management/upkeep.

PITI is around $904/mo with a 4.5% interest rate (not owner-occupied, rate is a little higher than market), $2300/yr property taxes and $1200/yr homeowners insurance. I'm estimating the homeowners insurance based on my own insurance, it might be a little higher? Not sure on that.

I don't know what expenses for upkeep will be, lets call it $3k/yr for carpets and odd appliance failures and shit like that. Could probably get a better feel for this when we own a lot more properties.

So thats $13,848 a year to own this property. Break-even rent would be $1,154. To make 10%/yr on the 30k invested, we'd have to rent it for $1,404/mo and keep it rented most of the time.

The question is, can we do that? Can we minimize the time we spend on each one to make 10%? If I could make 10% on $30k by investing it this way I'd buy 30 of these properties tomorrow, and I have the cash to do it.

Going to do a test run of 5 properties and let it ride for a year, and see how it goes. Do I only rent to white people? Only females? Have credit requirements that would make Sanders blush? Would make it harder to rent out but probably higher quality tenants. Need to do some testing and figure it out.

This is also discounting appreciation and equity, those are kinda bonuses in my book and shouldn't really be budgeted.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Rangoth

Blackwing Lair Raider
1,761
1,874
I'm no slum lord but I have rented before. Officially speaking, and I'm sure you know this, most states have anti-discrimination laws when it comes to race/religion/etc. However you can do background checks which mostly useless but you make the renter pay anyway so why not. All it will reveal are 18+ official criminal charges. It's not like you are hiring some private eye to dig up dirt. I've also done credit checks on people and I highly recommend doing that.

Overall I did make money, but nothing to brag about. I think when it comes to real estate, and this is where I just am guessing a little based on experience, you either own lots of it or big commercial complexes(malls/office buildings). My experience is that owning just a few properties which make so-so profit is more hassle than it's worth. But consider that I have a different full time job. I suppose if I tripled the units I own and quit my job it might equivalent, but that's just not what I want to do with my life, even if the "sell them all and be rich in retirement" is better than my 401k and private investments now.

Anyway, stories aside, I probably make 15% annually. Obviously what you can charge is completely dependent on where you own.
 

Lendarios

Trump's Staff
<Gold Donor>
19,360
-17,424
I am going to start been a slumlord by putting my small condo to rent.

In terms of tenant, I think couples who both work are the ideal tenants. Lots of single people out there. I did stayed away from single females, as I'm guessing they would call for every single thing to get fixed.
 

Cad

scientia potentia est
<Bronze Donator>
25,634
49,916
I'm no slum lord but I have rented before. Officially speaking, and I'm sure you know this, most states have anti-discrimination laws when it comes to race/religion/etc. However you can do background checks which mostly useless but you make the renter pay anyway so why not. All it will reveal are 18+ official criminal charges. It's not like you are hiring some private eye to dig up dirt. I've also done credit checks on people and I highly recommend doing that.

Overall I did make money, but nothing to brag about. I think when it comes to real estate, and this is where I just am guessing a little based on experience, you either own lots of it or big commercial complexes(malls/office buildings). My experience is that owning just a few properties which make so-so profit is more hassle than it's worth. But consider that I have a different full time job. I suppose if I tripled the units I own and quit my job it might equivalent, but that's just not what I want to do with my life, even if the "sell them all and be rich in retirement" is better than my 401k and private investments now.

Anyway, stories aside, I probably make 15% annually. Obviously what you can charge is completely dependent on where you own.
Wonder how many units I would need, if I did that full time, to make my current income? And how would that offset just investing the principal I'd use to buy the units in VTI and keep working?
 

OU Ariakas

Diet Dr. Pepper Enjoyer
<Silver Donator>
7,380
20,762
Khane, do you have experience with commercial investment properties? What type are you suggesting in place of residential? Warehouse? Strip Mall? Something other than that?
 

OU Ariakas

Diet Dr. Pepper Enjoyer
<Silver Donator>
7,380
20,762
Wonder how many units I would need, if I did that full time, to make my current income? And how would that offset just investing the principal I'd use to buy the units in VTI and keep working?
Every residential rental owner I know says that you should target 1% of purchase price as your monthly rent. Assuming a $100k house is 25k initial investment (25% down) you'd want to rent it for at least $1000 per month. If you make 15% annually that is $1800. Your ROR on initial investment is about 14% year on year but you'd have to have 56 rentals to break $100k in net income per year. You do have the added benefit of building equity free of charge over time but it is hard to calculate that into additional income per year.

This is napkin math so feel free to poke holes.
 

Cad

scientia potentia est
<Bronze Donator>
25,634
49,916
Every residential rental owner I know says that you should target 1% of purchase price as your monthly rent. Assuming a $100k house is 25k initial investment (25% down) you'd want to rent it for at least $1000 per month. If you make 15% annually that is $1800. Your ROR on initial investment is about 14% year on year but you'd have to have 56 rentals to break $100k in net income per year. You do have the added benefit of building equity free of charge over time but it is hard to calculate that into additional income per year.

This is napkin math so feel free to poke holes.
$25k * .14 = $3500/yr ROI

100,000/3500 = 28.57 rentals (lets just say 29?) to hit $100k income. How'd you get 56?

And 29 properties at $25k down each would be $725,000 initial investment. Thats actually not that bad, leveraged 3:1 that'd give you a property value of $2.9M.
 

Eomer

Trakanon Raider
5,472
272
Bro and I have been kicking around the idea of investing in a high rise tower project with a developer that we've done a few projects for. Their institutional investor backed out, because everyone's terrified of Alberta's economy right now with the oil downturn. To make a long story short, the developer is bringing land worth about 5 million in to the deal, and they're looking for investor groups to split another roughly 9 million in cash equity 4 ways equally. Then there's a roughly 50 million dollar first mortgage, and another 10 million mezzanine loan that may or may not insist on getting a cut of the overall deal in return for lower rates. The deal would be structured such that the developer and their partners who brought the land worth roughly 34% of the equity would get 50% of the cashflow and potential return on sale down the road, while the cash investors with 66% of the equity would get the other 50%. I don't know if that sort of a split is within a common range, I'd imagine that each of these deals is custom fit for the development and people involved. We don't necessarily have a huge concern with the split, as they've already done a lot of working in finding that piece of land, getting rezoning approved, and so on. At this point it's very, very turn key.

The main reason that we're even looking at it from an investment side is that we'd also of course like to do the mechanical installation on the building construction. If we jump in to bed together, they've committed to sole source the mechanical. The exact details of how we come to a negotiated price on the mechanical scope is yet to be worked out, as the mechanical design itself is still being completed. If we weren't fucking desperate for work, we'd likely not be considering investing that kind of money in a single project. My cut would be somewhere around half of my current investable assets (not including my own property, and my equity in the business). So it's a very, very big pill to swallow. But having this project on the books for 2017 and 2018 will probably be the difference between breaking even for a couple years without having to do a massive number of layoffs for office staff or potentially losing a few hundred k a year even after laying off half the office.

This isn't some guy that we met on the street putting this together. The project we're looking at investing in is a 30 story, 220 unit, institutional-class apartment project basically directly beside the provincial legislature and in the middle of the government office district. The project itself is a slam dunk. Their projections for rents, vacancies, etc are all pretty realistic from what we can see. And we just met with the construction manager this morning, who we've also had a long relationship with, and they're one of the other investing parties, and by all appearances the construction budget is very doable. At this point they're actually about a million dollars ahead having locked up about 35-40% of the construction costs. The same developer we just finished a 207 unit apartment project for earlier this year that was a forward sale to some German family. They're also building a 30 story, 600,000 square foot, AAA office building that's nearly complete. On that one they partnered with a hedge fund from down East. So these guys know what they're doing. And my family's relationship with one of the partners goes back nearly 20 years through various business associations etc.

So long story short, these aren't guys who are going to set out to fuck us. But! They are smart guys, who are professionals at negotiating deals like this, and they're going to do as well for themselves as they reasonably can. My brother and I have only ever gone in for a few hundred K on a couple other, much smaller projects where the deals were a lot more simple. Our dad in his day did get involved in some development as well, but never anything nearly this big. We're meeting with him this afternoon to see if he's interested in participating, and to pick his brain a bit. But otherwise, where should we turn to for advice? Would our accountant or lawyer be worthwhile talking to? A business broker or financial advisor?

I have a pretty good feeling about the investment, overall. If they were just asking for a couple hundred k from each of my brother and I and doing the project wasn't a consideration, we'd probably invest. Best case scenario is a 10-15 year investment with a 12-15% IRR, maybe higher depending on the real estate market and timing. A realistic worst case is that we get all or most of our original investment back 10 years later, but no return other than doing the job and keeping people employed. Obviously the absolute worst case is that we lose our entire investment and the mortgage company comes after our other assets, but that just isn't going to happen.

Fuck I wish I had some finance and business education!
 

Cad

scientia potentia est
<Bronze Donator>
25,634
49,916
Bro and I have been kicking around
This seems like a lot more of a sophisticated real estate developer type project, I wouldn't even know how to evaluate that project, or whether the terms they are giving you are fair. And if you don't know if what they are doing is fair, it probably isn't.
 

Eomer

Trakanon Raider
5,472
272
The presentation package we were given to review the project, financials and that kind of thing was drawn up with an institutional investor in mind (pension or hedge fund), they admitted as much when we met with them the other day. They've changed their strategy to pursue private investors instead because of the fear of Alberta's economy with the oil downturn. As far as fairness goes, that's all in the eye of the beholder I guess. There's no cut and dried way to value the risk that they took on buying the land, rezoning and so on. They've definitely put more work in to this point and assumed said risk, but with the way the deal is structured they don't have to put any more skin in the game and are nearly risk-free from here on out.

Oh and at this point there are no terms. No legal agreements or anything like that have been drawn up. That won't happen till they've got their 4 cash investors lined up, at which point they'll start setting the official agreements up.
 

Cad

scientia potentia est
<Bronze Donator>
25,634
49,916
The presentation package we were given to review the project, financials and that kind of thing was drawn up with an institutional investor in mind (pension or hedge fund), they admitted as much when we met with them the other day. They've changed their strategy to pursue private investors instead because of the fear of Alberta's economy with the oil downturn. As far as fairness goes, that's all in the eye of the beholder I guess. There's no cut and dried way to value the risk that they took on buying the land, rezoning and so on. They've definitely put more work in to this point and assumed said risk, but with the way the deal is structured they don't have to put any more skin in the game and are nearly risk-free from here on out.

Oh and at this point there are no terms. No legal agreements or anything like that have been drawn up. That won't happen till they've got their 4 cash investors lined up, at which point they'll start setting the official agreements up.
That kind of thing really needs someone who knows what they are doing and what questions to ask. What happens when they take your money, shut down the project and fuck off? Etc. Lots of legal protections need to be in place. Completion guarantees, debt structure, etc. I know you're saying they have a professional presentation, and thats great, but that doesn't mean anything in terms of how your investment is protected.
 

Eomer

Trakanon Raider
5,472
272
Oh yeah, that side of things we'll simply have to let our lawyers worry about when the time comes. Not a fucking chance that either my brother or I can evaluate any of the fine print. We're more concerned with how the rough structure of the deal stacks up. We're with Denton's, not Saul, so I have every confidence that they'll cover our asses. And that we'll pay through the nose for it.
 

Shonuff

Mr. Poopybutthole
5,538
791
Going to do a test run of 5 properties and let it ride for a year, and see how it goes. Do I only rent to white people?
Really? Every white person I've interviewed in the last month had a history of drugs, or was on them at the time of the interview. One guy we called for a follow up interview, and his old lady said he was in rehab. One guy emailed us stating that he was in drug court, but needed a break.

Every businessperson that I know that is doing well at rental property looks for college educated as a renter, as well as credit rating and occupation.

edit: Actually, there was one white guy that had his head together. But he wanted to make more money a day that I pay myself.
 

Khane

Got something right about marriage
20,449
14,142
Khane, do you have experience with commercial investment properties? What type are you suggesting in place of residential? Warehouse? Strip Mall? Something other than that?
I have no personal experience with commercial real estate. The only knowledge I have comes from a few guys I golf with that are big players in the commercial real estate business. They all prefer warehouses when it's a good building with a good lease because there is just way less maintenance and overhead on a warehouse but typically storefront properties are more lucrative even with the extra headaches (HVAC seems to be the biggest issue they have with buildings, in most bigger building it's nonstop maintenance on the systems apparently). Two of them only deal with major retail chains. They buy property, then shop it out to major chains like CVS, Walgreens, Dunkin Donuts, etc. The types of business that very rarely fail in any location and pay good money. They do entirely new builds. In fact the fuckers have been doing one right next to my damn house for the past 6 months. Nothing like constant noise from a lot being cleared then a building going up starting at 7AM every damn day.
 

OU Ariakas

Diet Dr. Pepper Enjoyer
<Silver Donator>
7,380
20,762
$25k * .14 = $3500/yr ROI

100,000/3500 = 28.57 rentals (lets just say 29?) to hit $100k income. How'd you get 56?

And 29 properties at $25k down each would be $725,000 initial investment. Thats actually not that bad, leveraged 3:1 that'd give you a property value of $2.9M.
Sorry, I was preparing for a VP meeting when I was doing the math.

$1000 per month x 12 months is $12,000 gross. If you net 15% after all expenses then you would make $1800 per year per house. That is where I got 56 houses to make $100,000/year net. I messed up ROI but you're looking at $1800 a year per $25,000 invested which is actually only 7.2% a year. I believe that still beats most stocks and mutual funds.
 

OU Ariakas

Diet Dr. Pepper Enjoyer
<Silver Donator>
7,380
20,762
Really? Every white person I've interviewed in the last month had a history of drugs, or was on them at the time of the interview. One guy we called for a follow up interview, and his old lady said he was in rehab. One guy emailed us stating that he was in drug court, but needed a break.

Every businessperson that I know that is doing well at rental property looks for college educated as a renter, as well as credit rating and occupation.

edit: Actually, there was one white guy that had his head together. But he wanted to make more money a day that I pay myself.
We have rented to every race, gender, and education level with no discernible pattern of behavior. Our two best rental families were both black, one was military (top notch) the other had two parents with jobs. My worst rentals were both single white guys who would get drunk/high and break stuff. We had to go through the entire eviction process with one of them. Most families fall in between those ranges but my default is to screen for stable work history and two parent families. TLDR; Lyrical is right and there are no magic bullets when looking for renters.
 

OU Ariakas

Diet Dr. Pepper Enjoyer
<Silver Donator>
7,380
20,762
I have no personal experience with commercial real estate. The only knowledge I have comes from a few guys I golf with that are big players in the commercial real estate business. They all prefer warehouses when it's a good building with a good lease because there is just way less maintenance and overhead on a warehouse but typically storefront properties are more lucrative even with the extra headaches (HVAC seems to be the biggest issue they have with buildings, in most bigger building it's nonstop maintenance on the systems apparently). Two of them only deal with major retail chains. They buy property, then shop it out to major chains like CVS, Walgreens, Dunkin Donuts, etc. The types of business that very rarely fail in any location and pay good money. They do entirely new builds. In fact the fuckers have been doing one right next to my damn house for the past 6 months. Nothing like constant noise from a lot being cleared then a building going up starting at 7AM every damn day.
We don't have enough liquid cash to jump right into storefronts; especially ground up new builds. There was someone in another thread that owned a warehouse and made great money off of it but I wouldn't even know how to evaluate warehouse property to see if I was in a desirable location.