IT/Software career thread: Invert binary trees for dollars.

ShakyJake said:

For those of you using AI coding agents for work, what's your typical workflow? Do you mostly stay inside the IDE, or are you primarily using the CLI or desktop tools like Cursor, Codex, and/or Claude Code?

Click to expand...

We use Cursor. Right now I am designing AI Agent standards for the org to use as I've done it the most. Not to say that's a lot but my past year or two of doing this is a lot more than just about anyone in this company. Cursor has a CLI offering like Claude now but for me personally I have used IDEs for over 20 years now. The user experience of just using it within what I know is fine. If Claude is somehow better it is eclipsed by the cost. Cursor is able to economically conserve token burn rate. Google's Antigravity is even better at this supposedly but I have not put much time to it.

The goal is to analyze all of the projects in our organization, design Cursor Rules/Skills/Hooks/etc to facilitate broad standardization. As this company grew immensely and its 10 times larger revenue wise than they were 4 years ago they have a lot of growing pain. Nothing is consistent at all and their primary projects are named around whatever their leadership at the time thought was cool. The primary application that runs the organization is named after a children's movie I shit you not.

This is my life right now:


All that being said token usage rate is going to be a big deal as companies seek to manage AI cost. Right now Claude is looking like the one you keep around if you're willing to really spend money on a few engineers but you do not want the org to use it as a whole. Getting a whole org into a different IDE from their usual one isn't as big a hurdle as you would think. But they are taking some time to understand why to have rules, skills, and what have you. They are all onboard with it though so I suspect we'll have a clean ship running here in like 6 months.

I have kept warning my superiors about this (big push toward Claude here and no one seems to be taking costs into their calculus atm) and keep getting hand waved. Our mostly non-technical leadership seems to think this is a magic wand that will cut staff costs and solve everything, even though some of us have demonstrated the impacts of data poisoning and feedback loops in the LLMs, plus modeled what long term costs will look like. This is the same company that tried to replace everyone below management with Poos at one point and we are still recovering from that fucking disaster. One would think that with the track record of our leadership fucking things up and the massive amount of cash that cloud computing is sucking out of us that someone might think twice about just grabbing ankles for this shit, but nope. No structure and no control, just like everything else out company has done.