Well. Covid proved to a lot of employers that they could, in fact, have many of their jobs get done "from anywhere". Which now also means "done cheaper in Costa Rica or India".The constant worry of being laid off appears to be the norm of the tech industry. Seems like since COVID, every day I think is today the day?
Just got laid off! They gave me a 2 week notice + 3 months of severance. I've passed the final interview on several jobs already so I can pocket this cash and move to a new role.
Essentially they pay me $45k to leave, and if I get the new job that I want, I'll get a $20k moving bonus.
So $65k just to switch companies, lmao
I'm very grateful because I hated this job, I had nothing to do for 3 years. Constant worry of layoff.
Well. Covid proved to a lot of employers that they could, in fact, have many of their jobs get done "from anywhere". Which now also means "done cheaper in Costa Rica or India".
Then you add in that all the big companies for the last year and a half have been pushing people into training AI models on how they do their jobs....
More than a few reasons to be concerned. The company always benefits from making you more replaceable. If you've read many of my posts on this topic you'll know I follow Amanda Goodall and she's like the harbinger of doom on this kind of topic. And she has shown the data that shows it's not that it SEEMS to be the new normal, it IS the new normal, and it's getting worse.
A sample of her stuff..
I'd estimate half. Dead internet theory currently has the number that around half of interactions are bots.Anybody else look at the responses and wonder how many were AI generated?
If this was your best employee couldn't you have just sent her home for the day rather than lose your best employee?Someone's job hunting, just not me.
Just had to fire my best employee because she decided to come into work drunk. I guess technically she quit because she refused to get tested.
Real mean drunk too, judging from the ride home.
When you're dealing with PIT equipment that can literally kill somebody, you can't just send them home to "cool down". The tolerance for reasonable suspicion in this industry is basically zero. It isn't just some excel sheet or line of code that can be dealt with tomorrow. You can't put the company at risk like that.If this was your best employee couldn't you have just sent her home for the day rather than lose your best employee?
If this was your best employee couldn't you have just sent her home for the day rather than lose your best employee?
don't bother listing the patent w/o the number, that will probably give a recruiter/hr an eyerollQuestion for you all..
Basically, let's say I found a way to make cars run on water instead of fuel. What my resume says is this:
"Invented an alternative to gasoline powered cars in the automotive industry which substantially reduced costs (patent pending)."
Is that considered a breach of confidentiality to my employer? I listed no details of the design, no patent number, no name for the patent, etc. Wondering if any company I submit my resume to would reach out to my employer trying to figure out what it is, while giving them my name.
You can search for patents by name of the inventor, so...Question for you all..
Basically, let's say I found a way to make cars run on water instead of fuel. What my resume says is this:
"Invented an alternative to gasoline powered cars in the automotive industry which substantially reduced costs (patent pending)."
Is that considered a breach of confidentiality to my employer? I listed no details of the design, no patent number, no name for the patent, etc. Wondering if any company I submit my resume to would reach out to my employer trying to figure out what it is, while giving them my name.
You can search for patents by name of the inventor, so...
Patent Public Search Basic | USPTO
ppubs.uspto.gov
If it really has your name on it they can find it, and if it doesn't they'll know you're a liar. Either way, do not recommend.
Finished the 4th round interview for a job I wasn't even expecting to interview for. I know I absolutely crushed the technical interviews. I felt iffy on one of the two behavioral ones.The coding assignments were take home and I just had to walk them through it and answer questions.
Overall experience was good though. Overall process was as so:
- Contacted by third party recruiter via Linkedin Message
- Call with third party recruiter
- Call with company internal recruiter
- 30 minutes call with hiring manager
- 1 hour with Operations manager -> Technical interview on scalable contact enrichment. Just pretty simple batch jobs via API. Nothing special but it was easy to me.
- 1 hour behavioral with a tangent VP -> This was cool but I didn't really know much about his organization. I've never worked on the ground sales so to speak.
- 1 hour with a marketing leader -> "Technical" but she wasn't the person to really sharpshoot it. She just wanted to see the design. I did well on that part I know.
I am like 85% sure I got the job. But who the fuck knows with these things. I liked the interview process though.
I discussed this in this thread or some other but the pay band for this role is nice. They will need to pay me near the max though.99% of my LinkedIn interactions go like this.
"Hey are you interested in this gig?"
"Is the pay gonna be worth my time?"
"No"
Why are we talking then?
The 18 months is from the earliest date your patent claims priority from, which can end up being earlier than 18 months. It could be published immediately if its a continuation or derivation patent.I forgot to mention, the example I gave of a water powered car is an example; that's not my actual invention. It's just that my resume is worded like that.
Now, from my understanding, patents take 18 months to be published (public). The patent was filed back in January this year so it won't be listed until 18 months from now, minimum.
Why do you not recommend?
The way I see it, it's only an issue if a competitor starts doing R&D to find out another way to invent the same solution and then takes away market share from my (former) company. Then, I can be sued but only if my (former) company can prove that the competitor created their product because of me, which seems unlikely.