Linux OS stuff Thread

What Linux distribution do you use @ HOME ?

  • Slackware

    Votes: 1 1.3%
  • Ubuntu

    Votes: 34 42.5%
  • Mint

    Votes: 17 21.3%
  • Fedora

    Votes: 13 16.3%
  • Debian

    Votes: 10 12.5%
  • SUSE

    Votes: 6 7.5%
  • Arch

    Votes: 5 6.3%
  • Gentoo

    Votes: 1 1.3%
  • Puppy

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Mandriva

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 25 31.3%

  • Total voters
    80

Kajiimagi

<Aristocrat╭ರ_•́>
3,762
7,110
Oh yeah update on my Linux PC experience. Put the live (Beta) of Bazzite in , it appeared to work. Tried to install it. Starts popping up errors but they are going too fast and the font is too small (on 4K screen) to read. No idea what it said. Then I pulled all the M2 & HDD's out of the PC and used a 16 oz sledge hammer on the rest. It's currently in the roll out ready for the landfill. I'm not a Linux savant by any stretch. Only distro I've ever successfully installed was Ubuntu with is the fisher-price of Linux distros.
 

Kharzette

Watcher of Overs
5,867
5,850
I'm thinking about doing this: Linux From Scratch

I've read through alot of it, mainly trying to understand what to do with the embedded stuff I've been working on, but I think I might try it just to learn.

Seems like it is geared towards making an OS for the machine you are working on. I've got a basic armbian running on my tater, so maybe I can start there and get something going.
 

Kharzette

Watcher of Overs
5,867
5,850
I thought arch for arm was dead ended, but it was just the goofy board company version. There's a generic arm64 that still gets lots of updates. I'm glad I checked before going thru with the above. That would have been a long process.

This time I think I did things a little more properly. I learned a few things about u-boot:

u-boot looks for a boot.cmd script in /boot that sets up alot of env vars and the kernel and init files. The kernel is easy, u-boot knows how to load them, but the init stuff is tricksier.

There's a mkimage utility that both compiles the boot.cmd into a boot.scr and wraps an initramfs into a u-boot friendly ram thing. Right now I'm just going to have to manually remember to run those when my kernel updates, but I think there might be a way to make it happen automagically. I'll figure it out later.

This new Arch arm install has the same problem with my = key that armbian did, so I'm hoping I can make it to having barrier running before I need an = key
 

sleevedraw

Revolver Ocelot
<Bronze Donator>
2,289
6,665
Can anyone recommend me a distro? I used mint a long time ago but I haven't kept up with the linux space. PC will be used as a 2nd screen next to my main PC and it primarily needs to do youtube (with adblock), streaming services and maybe run a 2nd box of EQ if I ever get back into that. It'll be running on a Dell prebuilt with an i5-12500 and the igpu for now.

I see CachyOS is popular but I also see Bazzite mentioned a lot for gaming.

Bazzite is safer for beginners who want things to "just work"; it runs off Fedora's code base, most dev tools natively target Red Hat/Fedora, and as an atomic-style distro, it's easier to roll back if an update breaks your system. IIRC, they also use at least some of Cachy's speed optimizations. However, some people don't like that it's heavily curated/opinionated (the developers have a lot of apps preinstalled to give you "everything you need" for gaming out of the box, including Steam, streaming apps, etc.).

Cachy is an Arch derivative and extremely fast. However, as an Arch derivative, the learning curve is higher, even though it's "easier" Arch. I would only recommend Arch derivatives (even the "easy Arch" ones) to an intermediate user on up (or someone willing to work through the pain) because there is regular system maintenance you are expected to do to avoid "Arch rot".

Like Noodle mentioned, I like OpenSUSE a lot too. Difficulty would be somewhere between Bazzite and Cachy (advanced beginner). While it's a traditional, non-atomic, distro like Cachy, SUSE runs all of their updates through automated QA checks, so it's pretty stable; I would call it "leading edge" instead of "bleeding edge". The predominant early challenges are installing codecs and such because (IIRC) German law prevents them from shipping the distro with them. It won't be quite as fast or optimized as the above two, but it's considered one of the preeminent distros for KDE, has been around forever, and has corporate support like Fedora/Red Hat, so unlike a lot of "currently popular" distros that come and go, you know it'll still be around in 5 years.
 
Last edited: