Mikhail and Hodj's Political Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

Loser Araysar

Log Wizard
<Gold Donor>
85,216
172,433
Then maybe you should refrain from inventing whatever narrative best suits your purposes.
How am I inventing anything?

My all the looks of it, the UFT is the farthest thing from a stable, prosperous communist state.

By every account, its a slab of land, going through anarchy, defended by an army of locals (Makhno's forces), being pinballed between the White Army and the Red Army, that collapses after 3 years. There wasn't even a government from what I can tell. Just people banding together like its 7,000 BC and trying to survive a civil war.
 

Loser Araysar

Log Wizard
<Gold Donor>
85,216
172,433
Guys, I lived in a Communist state from 1980-1991.

Anyone else here lived in a Communist state?
 
2,199
1
Oh god mik.
And now we've reached the part of the game where you pretend that every argument I make can be turned back around on me no matter how much evidence I can provide. This goes back to what I said earlier. You're not intellectually honest. You're trying to score technical rather than substantive points. This is boring. You're boring.
 
2,199
1
How am I inventing anything?

My all the looks of it, the UFT is the farthest thing from a stable, prosperous communist state.

By every account, its a slab of land, going through anarchy, defended by an army of locals (Makhno's forces), being pinballed between the White Army and the Red Army, that collapses after 3 years. There wasn't even a government from what I can tell. Just people banding together like its 7,000 BC and trying to survive a civil war.
Are you under the impression that anarchy is mutually incompatible with communism? Also..."by every account?" Are you serious, bro?
 

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
How is the UTF economy and society ethicaly superior?

To me minimizing human suffering is the most ethical thing. Sure sounds like they didn't do that
 
2,199
1
How is the UTF economy and society ethicaly superior?

To me minimizing human suffering is the most ethical thing. Sure sounds like they didn't do that
Yeah I'm sure it sounds that way to you after a sober and balancing reading of all the evidence and consideration of the wartime conditions around them. You're an idiot.
 

mkopec

<Gold Donor>
27,102
41,539
It does not matter what economic system you institute. Socialism, communism, anarchism... It all fails eventually because men are greedy bastards. They always will be, even if its not wealth, they will still be greedy for power.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
Best social experiment in the world proved communism is a failure and continues to do so today.

North Korea versus South Korea.

Prove me wrong without resorting to trying to blame America for not trading with a nation who declared they wanted the USA wiped off the face of the planet and sided with its most die hard enemies after the US tried to liberate it after WW2.

You can't do it.

North Korea had it all. It had open trade with the USSR and China. It was given more financial aid from both those entities than you can possibly imagine. Long before the USSR broke up and stopped giving it cash, and long long long before China gave up on it (China still gives it food and money aid hand over fist year over year in fact) the North Korean economy, structured on Juche ideology founded on Marxist and Maoist principles, had ground to a halt.

The worst part is that North Korea was economically, educationally and militarily stronger than South Korea but within 15 years those roles had reversed and now North Korea is hell on Earth, and South Korea exports this to the world every day



Now, the typical response will be to blame America or the West for North Korea's failings. This is a false argument, North Korea declared war on the United States, regularly calls for its destruction, allied itself with our greatest enemies post WW2 and basically brought every single thing that's happened to it since entirely upon itself. We had no responsibility to make sure North Korea was successful, yet here we are, 50 years later, still sending them food aid and even arming them with nukes, anything to make them just stop being idiots and start fixing their nation.

Also, Mikhail, the argument for Catalonia is a case of special pleading fallacy. You can't point to an ocean of failed experiments and say "This one experiment, which also failed, but which failed because of a confounding factor, would have certainly been the one case to succeed where all others failed, if only it hadn't been confounded mis process!" That's some goddamn Lumie levels of special pleading.

Now, was it the Yugoslavs or the Czechs that had an independent Communist state run by a benevolent dictator, Tito Ortiz? Or are the same thing in this time period? I can't even remember. Fucking balkanization. Anyway. That's a better example of a semi successful Communist state.

Still a pretty shitty one, though, because that communist state was overthrown in 1989, so it failed too. Just on a much longer time frame. But really, most examples are going to suck when the people who think you're wrong can point to the USSR, Mao, Cambodia, North Korea, Cuba and Venezuela all as examples of the outright devastation that die hard communist ideology causes. Its kinda like being a Nazi. Yeah you can point to how great Hitler ran the country economically before the war, and claim that justifies National Socialism, but then the people who disagree are just going to point to the concentration camps, the total destruction of Europe, the racist ideologies, etc. and say "Yeah, you know. Running a decent economy for a few years doesn't really make up for all that."

Mixed economies are the real success story, if any experiment on economics can be see in this light.

Mixed economies that embrace capitalism and embrace socialism as necessary based on events as they transpire are where all the successes are, really. Pure laissez faire capitalism doesn't work any better than Communism or Fascism.

Worse, in many cases.
 
2,199
1
It does not matter what economic system you institute. Socialism, communism, anarchism... It all fails eventually because men are greedy bastards. They always will be, even if its not wealth, they will still be greedy for power.
"Instituting" socialism is merely a matter of not having and enforcing laws to protect people's greed. Capitalism is not some natural state of affairs. It's absolutely an inflicted system.
 

mkopec

<Gold Donor>
27,102
41,539
Does not matter if you enforce them or not. There are wolves and there are sheep. It has always been this way and it will always continue to be so.
 

TrollfaceDeux

Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
<Bronze Donator>
19,577
3,743
Also how would an economic system like that survive the moment it needed raw materials or other goods not available to them on their land?

Hey China, have 10 goats, can I have some rare earth minerals please?
actually, that's what they did. Stalin took over the land and basically told the peasant to give shit or die. And to meet fucked up quotas, millions died. What did he do with all the grain that he confiscated? Sell it and buy raw material to build industry. oh, and to feed his city.
 
2,199
1
actually, that's what they did. Stalin took over the land and basically told the peasant to give shit or die. And to meet fucked up quotas, millions died. What did he do with all the grain that he confiscated? Sell it and buy raw material to build industry. oh, and to feed his city.
You're not talking about a communist system.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
Your examples of communism aren't communist.
This is a typical response from die hard communists. No communism is communism except their brand of communism, which is entirely their own, and predicated solely on their definitions of communism.

Yes, North Korea is a communist state. Yes, Juche Ideology is a Communist ideology. Yes China was a Communist state under Mao. Mao was one of the most prolific communist authors in history. Denials of these facts are proof of your dishonesty to yourself because it damages your ideology. They were absolutely communist. Cambodia was absolutely communist. The killing fields were predicated entirely upon Marxist concepts of going back to a primitive state and rebuilding society on communist concepts.

Denial is a river in Egypt Mikhail, leave it there.
 
2,199
1
This is a typical response from die hard communists. No communism is communism except their brand of communism, which is entirely their own, and predicated solely on their definitions of communism.
This is where you'll accuse me of succumbing to a no-true-Scotsman fallacy and I'll try to explain to you how necessary conditions work but I'll fail because you're too stupid.

I've danced this dance a million times before.
So now we get to do the next part of the dance: any economic system where workers aren't in control over the means of their work isn't socialist in character. At all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.