Lol. Mikhail, do you recall saying that the words Marxist Dialectic were gibberish?Yeah bro, copy-pasted text that doesn't actually make your argument = YOU JUST NUKED THEM COMMIES INTO OBLIVION. Got it.
Do you?
Lol. Mikhail, do you recall saying that the words Marxist Dialectic were gibberish?Yeah bro, copy-pasted text that doesn't actually make your argument = YOU JUST NUKED THEM COMMIES INTO OBLIVION. Got it.
From each according to his wallet, to each according to his needWhat I want to know is why Engels was so willing to pay for Marx's ride through life.
They're not more accurate, even within the framework you're appealing to. Not at all.Etymyological fallacy. You're free to redefine terms how you wish, but we're free to continue to use the traditional definitions, particularly since they're more accurate.
No, retard. What I want is for you to constrain your criticisms of socialism to actually socialist societies.What you want is to wall socialism off from criticism by pretending all the negatives of Communism don't exist because they didn't really happen under Communist rule. Its not different from neo Nazis trying to justify Hitler worship, really.
lol What the fuck are you talking about? PLEASE spend some more time reading about what "special pleading means."Still special pleading.
Yeah who cares about what's true and what isn't? I mean if a government that's stripped the working populace of economic power more effectively than the wildest dreams of capitalists wants to call itself socialist, well as long as it got to that point by following what Marx said, then it's socialist! That is fucking idiotic.Right, left, who cares. In the end Franco won. Catalonia didn't. Franco was a right winger.
Yeah, that's what I thought. No substantive refutation because you have no way of dealing with the fact that socialism != (political) marxism. Good job, idiot.This might be the single most idiotic sentence that you've ever typed bro.
I start insulting people's intelligence when I have to read some idiot using a bunch of terms he clearly doesn't understand in the wrong way over and over without ever once making a serious substantive counter-argument. At that point, I'm not talking to someone serious. I'm talking to some dipshit troll.You can tell when Mikhail is mad, and wrong, because he just starts trying to insult everyone's intelligence.
That had to do with someone who isn't a moron acting like one. You're an idiot. This is expected behavior.We went through how asinine and pathetic that was 6 months ago Mikhail. It ended in your disappearing act for half the year.
No retard. I said that the words "...operate from the Marxist dialectic..." were gibberish. Because they are.Lol. Mikhail, do you recall saying that the words Marxist Dialectic were gibberish?
Do you?
The circle jerk had to be invented for a reason, this is true.Maybe Engles was just bored and Marx personally amused him.
The world before television and computers had to have been one seriously fucked up place.
lolMikhail, do you have tourette's syndrome?
It seems like when you're angry, you give off really strong tourettes vibes.
Does calling others retarded when you've lost a debate help you feel better about losing the debate so badly?
I didn't give up. I mocked you for being so mad. I'm right here kiddo.lol
This is how you know when hodj has given up. He stops any attempt actually trying to defend his dipshit "argument" and just starts declaring victory. This is how he deals with the butthurt of not being able to actually defend his position.
lolMikhail,
How much work did you get done today?
Yeah, you're right there not bothering to defend your asinine conviction that political marxism is a necessary outcome of a socialist critique of capitalism (a conviction held in spite of the presence of real-world counter-examples). Good job being there, bro.I didn't give up. I mocked you for being so mad. I'm right here kiddo.
lolI already defended it bro.
Where? Come on dipshit, link the post and quote the segment.Its right up there for all to see bro.
Marx was a Marxist. He had a socialist critique of capitalism combined with a right-wing approach to dealing with it that left in place all the components of capitalism he despised and he (like most right-wingers) did everything in his power to shut down dissent on the matter.I mean we all know you live in a permanent state of denial. Denying that Pol Pot was communist. Denying Mao was communist. Hell you're practically deny Marx was communist.