No pussyshit Politics

Ngruk stop embarrassing yourself nationally and come try and spread your cultural conservatism here.

Curt Schilling Ties Himself In Knots Defending Donald Trump's Lust For A Young Girl

Matt Taibbi layin it down.
Matt Taibbi on the Fury and Failure of Donald Trump
View attachment 92816

RT fucked up and broke the news about the latest batch of hacked emails before Wikileaks had even released them.

RT breaking story on 6th batch of Podesta emails before Wikileaks announcement leads to internet losing their mind, claiming conspiracy -- Sott.net
RT beats internet to break #Podestaemails6 & everybody loses their minds (conspiracy theory warning)

fanaskin said:

It's funny how olscratch can posts pictures of raw objectification of woman in this thread then cry alligator tears about sexual contact.

Click to expand...

Raw as fuck.
It's funny how you can not give a shit your boy is a rapist ruskie but find offense at soft core tit pics.

fanaskin said:

He's German, and you're just as bad as trump with super exaggeration, you literally are trump in style.

Antagonistic and highly energetic with constantly exaggerating and repeating truthiness, you've literally become the caricature of what you mock.

Sad.

Click to expand...

Yeah East German maybe.

You seem to think when I say Trump is a ruskie I mean genetically not ideologically. I'm talking about his country loyalty.

fanaskin said:

Will he transfer a large portion of uranium stocks to Russia which is part of our national security if Russian money is bundled through a Canadian firm which effectively hides and launders it then funnels it into his charity while failing to disclose the foreign nature of the donation which is required by ny state law?

That would be pretty disloyal if he did that.

Click to expand...

Conspiracy theory debunked pages ago.

Olscratch said:

Ok got a link to angrypatriotmovement.com citing their source as this breitbart page. Steve Bannon, the executive chairman of Breitbart is now running the Donald J Trump for president campaign, so this gives me great hesitation that I might not be looking at journalism but propaganda. Wikileaks: Clinton Foundation Chatter with State Dept on Uranium Deal with Russia - Breitbart

Trump's claim that "Hillary Clinton’s State Department "approved the transfer of 20 percent of America’s uranium holdings to Russia, while nine investors in the deal funneled $145 million to the Clinton Foundation." seems somewhat similar to your claim that Hillary PERSONALLY sold ALL of our uranium to them. So I did a little research and what do you know, it nuanced.


"First, the State Department did approve of Russia’s gradual takeover of a company with significant U.S. uranium assets, but it didn’t act unilaterally. State was one of nine government agencies, not to mention independent federal and state nuclear regulators, that had to sign off on the deal.

Second, while nine people related to the company did donate to the Clinton Foundation, it’s unclear whether they were still involved in the company by the time of the Russian deal and stood to benefit from it.

Third, most of their Clinton Foundation donations occurred before and during Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential bid, before she could have known she would become secretary of state.

The bottom line: While the connections between the Clinton Foundation and the Russian deal may appear fishy, there’s simply no proof of any quid pro quo.
No ‘Veto Power’ for Clinton on Uranium Deal
Did Clinton help Russia obtain uranium for donations? Nope
Fact check: Donald Trump’s false claim on Russian uranium deal – Correct The Record

After reading all that I can just as easily dismiss it as conspiracy theory/propaganda/shit that passes for fact unchecked in the other thread.












View attachment 92608

Click to expand...

Trump’s Tax Returns: From Russia With Love
Trump's treatment of intelligence briefing stuns experts

"The former officials, who have served presidents in both parties, say they were bewildered when Trump cast doubt on Russia's role after receiving a classified briefing on the subject and again after an unusually blunt statement from U.S. agencies saying they were "confident" that Moscow had orchestrated the attacks.

"It defies logic," retired Gen. Michael Hayden, former director of the CIA and the National Security Agency, said of Trump's pronouncements.

"He seems to ignore their advice," Hayden said. "Why would you assume this would change when he is in office?"

During the second presidential debate, Trump ignored what a U.S. government official said the candidate learned in a private intelligence briefing: that government officials were certain Russia hacked the DNC. That conclusion was followed by a public and unequivocal announcement by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the Department of Homeland Security that Russia was to blame.

"Maybe there is no hacking," Trump said during that debate."

"I don't recall a previous candidate saying they didn't believe" the information from an intelligence briefing, said John Rizzo, a former CIA lawyer who served under seven presidents and became the agency's acting general counsel. "These are career people. They aren't administration officials. What does that do to their morale and credibility?"