Nuremberg (2025)

Adebisi

Adebisi

Clump of Cells
<Silver Donator>
28,366
31,343
0.00 star(s) Rating: 0.00/5 1 Votes
Title: Nuremberg (2025)

Tagline: Judgment is coming.

Genre: History, Drama

Director: James Vanderbilt

Cast: Russell Crowe, Rami Malek, Michael Shannon, Leo Woodall, John Slattery, Richard E. Grant, Colin Hanks, Mark O'Brien, Lotte Verbeek, Wrenn Schmidt, Lydia Peckham, Andreas Pietschmann, Steven Pacey, Peter Jordan, Dan Cade, Paul Antony-Barber, Ralph Berkin, Roderick Hill, Wolfgang Cerny, Giuseppe Cederna, Jeremy Wheeler, Donald Sage Mackay, Alex Diehl, Dieter Riesle, Fleur Bremmer, András Korcsmáros, Wayne Brett, Blake Kubena, Tom Keune, Billy Rayner, Gyula Mesterházy, Michael Sheldon, Ben Miles

Release: 2025-11-06

Runtime: 148

Plot: In postwar Germany, an American psychiatrist must determine whether Nazi prisoners are fit to go on trial for war crimes, and finds himself in a complex battle of intellect and ethics with Hermann Göring, Hitler's right-hand man.

 
Adebisi

Adebisi

Clump of Cells
<Silver Donator>
28,366
31,343
I'm 20 minutes into this movies and I'm so fucking annoyed at how lazy the dialog is.

Lead character "I need guy to do the thing"

*5 minutes later guy clearly does the thing*

Lead character "the guy just did the thing"

OR

Lead character "What's going on?"
Extra "something you'll see is obvious in 5 seconds but I'll just tell you what it is anyways in clunky unnatural dialog... Possibly in ADR"
 
  • 2Worf
Reactions: 1 users
Bondurant

Bondurant

Ahn'Qiraj Raider
3,998
5,027
This movie was only about how both Russell Crowe and Rami Malek would perform for Oscar bait. Making a movie about Nuremberg trials and completely eluding people like Kaltenbrunner and Speer is just plain dumb.
 
Gravel

Gravel

Mr. Poopybutthole
46,169
166,556
Adebisi said:
I'm 20 minutes into this movies and I'm so fucking annoyed at how lazy the dialog is.

Lead character "I need guy to do the thing"

*5 minutes later guy clearly does the thing*

Lead character "the guy just did the thing"

OR

Lead character "What's going on?"
Extra "something you'll see is obvious in 5 seconds but I'll just tell you what it is anyways in clunky unnatural dialog... Possibly in ADR"
Click to expand...
You expect blatant propaganda to have good writing?
 
  • 2Worf
Reactions: 1 users
Cynical

Cynical

Canuckistani Terrorist
2,430
5,636
Aww John Goodman got fat again?

Wait it's Russell Crowe, what the fuck lol
 
  • 2Worf
Reactions: 1 users
kroenen

kroenen

Regimen Morum
6,822
32,823
I’d rather watch a Riverdance performance with Michael Flatley than sit thru this.

3inrZ9.gif
 
  • 2Worf
  • 1Like
Reactions: 2 users
jayrebb

jayrebb

Naxxramas 1.0 Raider
15,917
15,921
I've hit my limit with Russell Crowe Award-winning accents.

The Latin priest accent movie just killed it for me. If he has even 1% of a German accent in this it's a no-go.

Just deliver your fucking lines.
 
  • 1Solidarity
Reactions: 1 user
Animosity

Animosity

Silver Baronet of the Realm
7,949
6,892
TBT-TheBigToe said:
What is the propaganda angle here in this movie?
Click to expand...
The ending rant and dialogue felt very on the nose to the Trump and his followers being Nazi's.

That aside, I thought this was a engaging watch and worth the time.
 
  • 1Great Review
Reactions: 1 user
JOESAN21

JOESAN21

<Gold Donor>
1,262
2,893
Thought it was good. Saw it couple days ago. It’s definitely trying to be Oscar bait even though I can’t imagine Hollywood giving an actor playing Herman Goring a award

Crowe does a good job as Goring. I felt like they missed some of his arrogance and temper in the movie as even his fellow Nazis said “that’s the real Goring” during the trial. His opioid addiction is exposed but you don’t see a huge attitude change after he gets off the drugs; at least as much as I have re ad about.

The lead prosecutor seems to waiver back and forth as the movie progresses and seemed to disagree with this initial statements later on

The concentration camp scenes were over done and unnecessary for most people that have not studied ww2 Really threw my wife for a loop (she’d never seen most of those films) and didn’t add to her liking the movie

pros
— Good acting
— Good storyline
— Dialogue matches acting ability
— Historically pretty close ish
— Asks some thought provoking questions
— Actually showed the executions were botched (was really surprised they added that)

cons

—leave out a lot of history…the Soviets especially
—Not propaganda but they did beat the horse a tad
—The Catholic Chirch part was ahistorical but Hollywood loves to beat on the Vatican so there….
—the military bearing was atrocious

The movie is worth a watch, and they did a pretty good job of trying to present the material in less than three hour timeframe. If you like history, I think you will like the movie
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user
Movie information in first post provided by The Movie Database
You must log in or register to reply here.